Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

GPV Preimage Sampling with Weak Smoothness and Its Applications to Lattice Signatures

Shiduo Zhang, Huiwen Jia, Delong Ran, Yang Yu, Yu Yu, Xiaoyun Wang

Published Dec 7, 2025• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-95-5099-9_8

Related papers

New Trapdoor and Preimage Sampling on NTRU Lattice

Chengrong Liu, Chunming Tang, Huiwen Jia

Communications in computer and information science•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Exact Lattice Sampling from Non-Gaussian Distributions

Maxime Plançon, Thomas Prest

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2021•3 citations

Tight Lattice-Based Signatures without Trapdoors from Search LWE

Nico Döttling, Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Julian Loss +2 more

The study of digital signatures with tight reductions has attracted considerable attention over the past two decades, as such schemes inherit essentially the same quantitative hardness as the underlying computational problem. In the context of lattice-based cryptography, the GPV approach (Gentry, Peikert, and Vaikuntanathan, STOC ’08) admits a simple tight reduction from the SIS problem, but relies on preimage sampling via trapdoors, which often leads to complex and brittle implementations. By contrast, tight proofs for trapdoor-free constructions, following the Fiat–Shamir paradigm, necessarily rely on decisional assumptions, most notably the decisional LWE assumption. From the perspective of concrete security, however, reliance on a search assumption is preferable, as known search-to-decision reductions for LWE provide only weak quantitative guarantees. \ind This paper presents the first efficient lattice-based signature scheme with a tight reduction to a search assumption (namely, the hardness of the search LWE problem) that does not require any trapdoor in the scheme itself (but merely uses, instead, a trapdoor in the proof). Our construction follows the Fiat-Shamir paradigm and can be viewed as a lattice analogue of Chevallier–Mames signatures (CRYPTO ’05). Establishing security in the lattice setting, however, requires overcoming significant technical obstacles: in particular, our proof develops several new techniques to cope with the inherently weak soundness guarantees of lattice-based interactive proofs.

•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for lattice systems: A first look

Karl Jansen, Hernan Leövey, A. Ammon +2 more

arXiv:1302.6419•Computer Physics Communications•Oct 24, 2013•15 citations

Analysis of the Falcon signature compared to other signatures. GPV and Rabin frameworks

D.V. Harmash

The article discusses the analysis of the essence and protection possibilities of the Falcon post-quantum signature. The main properties of the Falcon signature are considered. An estimate of what resources and computing power is required to use successfully the Falcon signature. A structural analysis of the Falcon signature is performed. The GPV and Rabina frameworks are analyzed. Detailed conclusions are made regarding the conducted analyses. The stability and complexity of the GPV and Rabin frameworks are evaluated, the main structures and protocols of these frameworks are considered. A detailed analysis of the main properties of NTRU lattices is carried out, the main rules of factorization of the GPV and Rabin frameworks are considered. Fast Fourier sampling is investigated. Conclusions are made regarding each conducted study.

Radiotekhnika•Dec 30, 2022•0 citations

Simple Lattice Trapdoor Sampling from a Broad Class of Distributions

Vadim Lyubashevsky, Daniel Wichs

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•50 citations
The study of digital signatures with tight reductions has attracted considerable attention over the past two decades, as such schemes inherit essentially the same quantitative hardness as the underlying computational problem. In the context of lattice-based cryptography, the GPV approach (Gentry, Peikert, and Vaikuntanathan, STOC ’08) admits a simple tight reduction from the SIS problem, but relies on preimage sampling via trapdoors, which often leads to complex and brittle implementations. By contrast, tight proofs for trapdoor-free constructions, following the Fiat–Shamir paradigm, necessarily rely on decisional assumptions, most notably the decisional LWE assumption. From the perspective of concrete security, however, reliance on a search assumption is preferable, as known search-to-decision reductions for LWE provide only weak quantitative guarantees. \ind This paper presents the first efficient lattice-based signature scheme with a tight reduction to a search assumption (namely, the hardness of the search LWE problem) that does not require any trapdoor in the scheme itself (but merely uses, instead, a trapdoor in the proof). Our construction follows the Fiat-Shamir paradigm and can be viewed as a lattice analogue of Chevallier–Mames signatures (CRYPTO ’05). Establishing security in the lattice setting, however, requires overcoming significant technical obstacles: in particular, our proof develops several new techniques to cope with the inherently weak soundness guarantees of lattice-based interactive proofs.
The article discusses the analysis of the essence and protection possibilities of the Falcon post-quantum signature. The main properties of the Falcon signature are considered. An estimate of what resources and computing power is required to use successfully the Falcon signature. A structural analysis of the Falcon signature is performed. The GPV and Rabina frameworks are analyzed. Detailed conclusions are made regarding the conducted analyses. The stability and complexity of the GPV and Rabin frameworks are evaluated, the main structures and protocols of these frameworks are considered. A detailed analysis of the main properties of NTRU lattices is carried out, the main rules of factorization of the GPV and Rabin frameworks are considered. Fast Fourier sampling is investigated. Conclusions are made regarding each conducted study.