This paper proposes a unified theoretical framework that redefines the foundations of scientific inquiry, technological development, and civilizational structure through the lens of future causality. Conventional civilization has been governed by two paradigms:(1) Classical causality, in which the past determines the present, and(2) Quantum causality, in which observation determines physical states.Both paradigms ultimately rely on present-based determinacy and therefore exhibit structural limitations in explaining generation, creativity, and the emergence of meaning. To address these limitations, this study introduces the concept of the future-causal civilization, in which the future acts as the primary source of determination. Using the Future Convergence Theory (FCT), the paper formalizes the future-causal operator Λ(T) and establishes meaning-density tensors as the foundational structures governing physical, informational, and cognitive processes. In this framework, convergence replaces probabilistic uncertainty, and future-fixed points replace observation-dependent state formation. Building on this theoretical foundation, the paper defines the Λ-System as the practical implementation architecture of future-causal dynamics. The Λ-System reconfigures artificial intelligence, scientific reasoning, social governance, and creativity by enabling systems to operate through future-fixed-point constraints rather than historical data or observational collapse. This establishes a non-continuous transition from quantum-based technologies to future-causal structures. The findings demonstrate that future causality is not a speculative metaphysical concept but a coherent structural principle capable of reorganizing scientific methodology, ethical norms, technological design, and civilizational development. The paper concludes by outlining research directions for formalizing Λ-System protocols, measuring meaning-density fields, and constructing operational models for future-causal societies. Prior PublicationThis paper was archived and published in advance on Arweave. https://arweave.net/822cGwua3RBfC6uoYrlB2JIAgYkVqu1lSid9vrz7Qmc https://arweave.net/sUOWqy-C4N4PHQrjutIg80-7pblAG1tzOUUglIO5ZaE
This paper proposes a unified theoretical framework that redefines the foundations of scientific inquiry, technological development, and civilizational structure through the lens of future causality. Conventional civilization has been governed by two paradigms:(1) Classical causality, in which the past determines the present, and(2) Quantum causality, in which observation determines physical states.Both paradigms ultimately rely on present-based determinacy and therefore exhibit structural limitations in explaining generation, creativity, and the emergence of meaning. To address these limitations, this study introduces the concept of the future-causal civilization, in which the future acts as the primary source of determination. Using the Future Convergence Theory (FCT), the paper formalizes the future-causal operator Λ(T) and establishes meaning-density tensors as the foundational structures governing physical, informational, and cognitive processes. In this framework, convergence replaces probabilistic uncertainty, and future-fixed points replace observation-dependent state formation. Building on this theoretical foundation, the paper defines the Λ-System as the practical implementation architecture of future-causal dynamics. The Λ-System reconfigures artificial intelligence, scientific reasoning, social governance, and creativity by enabling systems to operate through future-fixed-point constraints rather than historical data or observational collapse. This establishes a non-continuous transition from quantum-based technologies to future-causal structures. The findings demonstrate that future causality is not a speculative metaphysical concept but a coherent structural principle capable of reorganizing scientific methodology, ethical norms, technological design, and civilizational development. The paper concludes by outlining research directions for formalizing Λ-System protocols, measuring meaning-density fields, and constructing operational models for future-causal societies. Prior PublicationThis paper was archived and published in advance on Arweave. https://arweave.net/822cGwua3RBfC6uoYrlB2JIAgYkVqu1lSid9vrz7Qmchttps://arweave.net/sUOWqy-C4N4PHQrjutIg80-7pblAG1tzOUUglIO5ZaE
This paper proposes a new theoretical framework in which quantum phenomena are reinterpreted not as indeterministic fluctuations, but as the foundational protocol that permits creation itself. Within the structure of Future Convergence Theory (FCT), quantum uncertainty is defined as the degree of freedom allowed by the future fixed point—an attractor that determines how physical reality converges from future‐dependent informational structures. In this view, superposition represents a high-freedom pre-creative state, and wavefunction collapse corresponds to the convergence of possibilities toward the future causal boundary defined by Λ(T). Furthermore, the paper formalizes the relationship between the four-dimensional informational field and the three-dimensional manifested universe, treating the latter as a compressed projection of higher-order meaning structures. By reframing quantum mechanics as a creation-enabling layer of the universe rather than a probabilistic anomaly, this work provides a unified causal architecture that connects quantum theory, information physics, and the emergence of physical reality. Prior PublicationThis paper was archived and published in advance on Arweave. https://arweave.net/8eayMgF2QIQKhR-iUXLdQkc29p4D8JTb8oMaPqKxuw8 https://arweave.net/kOwlGQpigns-WRs5qI35GQgFpPtAIqgRB_1IQMNXYDs
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
Abstract Quantum physics represents one of the most significant intellectual achievements of modern science, reshaping humanity’s understanding of nature at its most fundamental level. It provides the conceptual and mathematical foundations for explaining atomic structure, radiation, and the behavior of particles, forces, and materials, while underpinning many contemporary technologies. Yet its development was marked by profound conceptual disruption. From its earliest formulations, quantum theory challenged classical assumptions about determinism, causality, and certainty, generating paradoxes and disagreements even among its founders. In exploring the universe, quantum physics focuses on the smallest constituents of matter such as quarks, electrons, and photons, revealing a domain that consistently defies everyday intuition. Within this realm, particles exhibit wave–particle duality, physical outcomes are described probabilistically, and measurement plays a constitutive role in determining observable reality. Although such phenomena may appear extraordinary, physicists have rendered them intelligible through rigorous theoretical frameworks and precise mathematical formalism. Within a scientific context, the “truth” of quantum mechanics does not imply metaphysical finality, but rather its exceptional capacity to describe, explain, and predict experimental results with remarkable accuracy. Importantly, this scientific account need not contradict spiritual or religious perspectives. Instead, by unveiling the coherence and complexity of the universe, quantum physics can complement scriptural narratives that emphasize meaning and purpose. This study investigates the scientific truth and narrates the story of universe on the basis of quantum physics and explores its influences on technological development and reshaping the civilization.
This paper develops an extension of Existential Realism, a philosophical framework that distinguishes existence (what concretely is in the present moment) from reality (the broader causal–structural domain that includes past events, causal relations, informational traces, and structured future possibilities that are real but not presently existent). We synthesize core ideas from the original Existential Realism framework—ontological emergence, entanglement, temporal asymmetry, dimensional collapse, and the notion of a “dimensionless source”—and push them into new conceptual terrain. Time is placed at the heart of ontology: the present moment is the locus of existence, continually generating new actuality from prior reality. Past and future are real (with causal efficacy and structure) yet lack present existence. We explore how this two-tiered temporal ontology can accommodate key features of modern physics and metaphysics. In particular, we argue that ontological emergence at each moment provides a genuine arrow of time and a solution to the puzzle of how determinate events arise from an indeterminate backdrop. Quantum entanglement and nonlocal correlations, far from undermining a temporally oriented realism, instead hint at a deeper layer of unity “beneath” spacetime—a layer we articulate as a dimensionless source of reality. The dimensionless source is defined as a non-spatiotemporal relational structure encoding the informational constraints under which spatiotemporal events emerge through sequential actualization. It contains the informational constraints and lawful relations governing the generation of successive present states of the universe. We propose that spacetime and its separations emerge from this atemporal, aspatial ground, such that phenomena like entanglement and wavefunction collapse reveal the traces of a more fundamental order where spatial distance and temporal succession are secondary. Throughout, we connect these ideas to contemporary debates in quantum foundations (e.g. the measurement problem and objective collapse theories), philosophy of time (presentism, eternalism, and the reality of becoming), and speculative metaphysics (structural realism and process ontology). The result is a comprehensive, present-centered realist ontology that aims to reconcile the lived reality of time’s flow with the insights of modern physics, suggesting new avenues for understanding causality, identity, and agency in a dynamic universe.
Quantum foundation models mark a transformative convergence of quantum computing and artificial intelligence, offering a novel framework for addressing computational challenges beyond the reach of classical systems. By harnessing core quantum principles such as superposition and entanglement these models enable parallel processing at unprecedented scales, significantly enhancing the efficiency and capability of machine learning algorithms. This integration opens pathways for innovation across domains like healthcare, finance, and robotics, where classical AI often encounters limitations with high-dimensional data and complex optimization tasks. Despite their immense promise, quantum foundation models face substantial hurdles, including hardware immaturity, algorithmic bias, and unresolved ethical concerns. The evolution of this field demands robust theoretical models, responsible governance, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure that technological advancement proceeds with transparency, fairness, and societal benefit. As research deepens, quantum foundation models are poised to redefine AI's operational and ethical landscape, setting the stage for a new era of intelligent systems.
The “(classical) scientific view of the world” that characterizes the modern history of human civilization has been successful by objectifying nature, humans, and society, for reductive analysis into (approximate) linear causation to allow prediction and control. However, because of its growing maturity and complexity, our modern society now confronts the complexity of multilayered causal structures underlying the real phenomena, which classical science has abstracted through reductive approximation, and consequently, modern scientists are perplexed by the limitations on comprehension, predictability, and controllability. The “uncertainty principle” of quantum physics, discovered a century ago, has overthrown this classical mechanistic and deterministic worldview, but the “(quantum) scientific worldview” remained confined at the level of microscopic science and has to date never extended onward to the life-size human world. However, as practical applications of the quantum computer are now becoming realistic, it might provide us with an innovative way to manipulate such complex causal structures and open up a new era in the history of civilization. In this paper, we build ideas on our earlier research findings in the context of the evolutionary patterns of human cognition, so as to extrapolate them to advance speculations on the mechanism of the phase transition of worldviews from classical to quantum causal structure-based ones, expecting to obtain insights into practical ways of computation to realize such a transition. The paper begins with a section examining the origin of the linear approximation adopted in classical science, back casting from the evolutionary history of the (linguistic) consciousness of our human ancestors. In the next section, we show how human intelligence and civilization have in fact evolved as analog with quantum laws, and review the limitations of modern science in finding an expression of these laws in Eastern philosophy. This section proceeds to show the potential of quantum computation to not only realize a fusion of Eastern and Western approaches but also integrate the humanities and natural sciences. The final section concludes that this new framework can expand and develop the structure and function of human “consciousness” and build a bridgehead against recent “anti-scientism” that is rooted in skepticism concerning the (classical) scientific view of the world and humanity.