Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bell's Theorem Re-examined in Stein Theory

I. Pearson

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.26158.16962

Related papers

Comments on the Significance of Bell's Theorem

Arthur I. Fine

Physical Review Letters•Nov 15, 1982•8 citations

A Local Hidden Variable Model Using Phenomenological Velocity and Its Implications for Bell’s Theorem

Parker Emmerson

Bell’s theorem presents a fundamental limit on the correlations achievable by any local hidden variable theory, seemingly precluding such models from reproducing quantum mechanical predictions. In this paper, we introduce a local hidden variable model based on phenomenological velocity and curvature operator techniques. By constructing a mathematical framework that maintains locality and realism, we demonstrate that it is possible to reproduce the quantum mechanical correlation functions that violate Bell’s inequalities. This challenges the conventional understanding imposed by Bell’s theorem and suggests the need for a re-examination of the foundational assumptions in quantum mechanics.

•Mar 18, 2025•0 citations

On Some Reinforcements of Bell's Theorem

Tomasz Bigaj

Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

AGAINST MANY-WORLDS INTERPRETATIONS

Adrian Kent

This is a critical review of the literature on many-worlds interpretations, MWI, with arguments drawn partly from earlier critiques by Bell and Stein. The essential postulates involved in various MWI are extracted, and their consistency with the evident physical world is examined. Arguments are presented against MWI proposed by Everett, Graham and DeWitt. The relevance of frequency operators to MWI is examined; it is argued that frequency operator theorems of Hartle and Farhi-Goldstone-Gutmann do not in themselves provide a probability interpretation for quantum mechanics, and thus neither support existing MWI nor would be useful in constructing new MWI. Comments are made on papers by Geroch and Deutsch that advocate MWI. It is concluded that no plausible set of axioms exists for an MWI that describes known physics.

arXiv:gr-qc/9703089•International Journal of Modern Physics A•May 10, 1990•167 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms

Gordon Watson

•Jul 1, 2018•0 citations

Mathematical and Physical Examination of the Locality Condition Bell's Theorem.

H. Razmi

Using the Clauser-Horne model of Bell's theorem, the locality condition is examined and it is shown the corresponding formulation is equivalent to a factorization process consisting of three stages. The first stage is introduced based on the conditional probability definition in classical theory of probability and the other two stages are based on previously-known relations named as outcome and parameter independence conditions.

Physics Essays•Dec 1, 2006•1 citation
Bell’s theorem presents a fundamental limit on the correlations achievable by any local hidden variable theory, seemingly precluding such models from reproducing quantum mechanical predictions. In this paper, we introduce a local hidden variable model based on phenomenological velocity and curvature operator techniques. By constructing a mathematical framework that maintains locality and realism, we demonstrate that it is possible to reproduce the quantum mechanical correlation functions that violate Bell’s inequalities. This challenges the conventional understanding imposed by Bell’s theorem and suggests the need for a re-examination of the foundational assumptions in quantum mechanics.
This is a critical review of the literature on many-worlds interpretations, MWI, with arguments drawn partly from earlier critiques by Bell and Stein. The essential postulates involved in various MWI are extracted, and their consistency with the evident physical world is examined. Arguments are presented against MWI proposed by Everett, Graham and DeWitt. The relevance of frequency operators to MWI is examined; it is argued that frequency operator theorems of Hartle and Farhi-Goldstone-Gutmann do not in themselves provide a probability interpretation for quantum mechanics, and thus neither support existing MWI nor would be useful in constructing new MWI. Comments are made on papers by Geroch and Deutsch that advocate MWI. It is concluded that no plausible set of axioms exists for an MWI that describes known physics.