(日本語バージョンは英語の後にあります)This paper presents the final unified form of the StoSoJe Theory, formalizingMeaning (Ψ) = Being as the sole fundamental reality. Physical laws, spacetime,quantum phenomena, and consciousness are all derived layers generated as theself-projection of Ψ. This completely resolves all fundamental contradictionsinherent in conventional physics, quantum theory, cosmology, and philosophy (e.g.,the problem of non-being, the pre-Big Bang problem, the observation problem, andquantum uncertainty).本論文は、ストソジェ理論の最終統一形を示すものであり、意味(Ψ)=在る(Being)を唯一の根源実在として定式化する。物理法則・時空・量子現象・意識はすべて、Ψの自己射影(( () ))として生成される派生層である。これにより、従来の物理学・量子論・宇宙論・哲学に存在したすべての根本的矛盾(無の問題、ビッグバン以前問題、観測問題、量子の不確定性など)は完全に解消される。
(日本語バージョンは英語の後にあります)This paper presents the final unified form of the StoSoJe Theory, formalizingMeaning (Ψ) = Being as the sole fundamental reality. Physical laws, spacetime,quantum phenomena, and consciousness are all derived layers generated as theself-projection of Ψ. This completely resolves all fundamental contradictionsinherent in conventional physics, quantum theory, cosmology, and philosophy (e.g.,the problem of non-being, the pre-Big Bang problem, the observation problem, andquantum uncertainty).本論文は、ストソジェ理論の最終統一形を示すものであり、意味(Ψ)=在る(Being)を唯一の根源実在として定式化する。物理法則・時空・量子現象・意識はすべて、Ψの自己射影(( () ))として生成される派生層である。これにより、従来の物理学・量子論・宇宙論・哲学に存在したすべての根本的矛盾(無の問題、ビッグバン以前問題、観測問題、量子の不確定性など)は完全に解消される。
We develop a mathematical and philosophical framework in which conscious obser- vation is the fundamental act that brings reality into existence. Before observation, nothing exists in an actualized sense: not space, time, laws, or structures. Reality is purely a manifold of potential universes, each containing possible laws and possible observers. When a conscious observer emerges, the act of observation actualizes the unique minimal universe consistent with its existence. This is not a selection among alternatives but an ontological crystallization that transforms possibility into actuality, retroactively defining the universe’s laws, constants, structure, and history. Within this actualized universe, unobserved properties remain probabilistic un- til collapsed by observation. We formalize sensory collapse, observer priority, multi- observer shared reality, emergent time, retroactive history, and the closed feedback loop between observers and their universe. This framework unifies consciousness, existence, physics, and cosmology into a single observer-centric formalism.
Metaphysics, as discipline dealing with the most fundamental aspects of reality, studies the essence of entities, leaving to particular sciences the study of empirical, specific, changeable and unstable aspects. In this sense metaphysics is close to ontology, tackling problems as the existence of God, the being in himself, the immortality of consciousness, the origin and meaning of the universe. Speculative physics pushes its interest to metaphysical questions too, both at atechnical (mathematical) level, and at the level of thought (in relation to philosophy). In recentyears interesting concepts and ideas have been considered and developed, involving the latest unified quantum-relativistic theories and the consequences on reality deriving from them.The search for a meaning of life, one of Anscombe’s themes, finds ferment in the search for meaning about the existence of our universe in itself and as a possible part of a multiverse containing it.The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics appears from the application of themathematical formalism to macroscopic situations and the central position of the observer in this process has produced a deviation towards a metaphysical subjectivism. There are controversial aspects about the role of consciousness in the process of reducing the wave function of quantum mechanics. This narrows the field of validity of some fundamental principles during the interaction between microsystems and macrosystems, with consequent diversification of thedefinition of the ontological state of consciousness and reality. (Local) holism has often been linked to Wittgenstein. From Wittgenstein’s answers to the paradoxes of communication and conceptual relativism, a tension emerges in his vision of linguistic games and in his mental experiments, traditionally interpreted in contrasting ways. This tension can be better understoodthrough some reflections by Wittgenstein on Einstein and his theory of relativity.
ABSTRACT We present a unified theoretical framework for physical reality, consciousness, and their relationship, grounded in a single primitive: the Act of Becoming Real. The Act is the transition from possibility to actuality — the most primitive fact about any universe in which anything exists rather than merely might exist. We show that this primitive, examined from two irreducible perspectives, yields the complete structure of physical reality when viewed from outside (constraint dynamics, spacetime geometry, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, gravity) and the complete structure of conscious experience when viewed from inside (awareness, the act of knowing, recursive self-modeling, phenomenological qualia). These are not two theories but one: physics and phenomenology are the third-person and first-person descriptions of the same Act at the same scales of organization. From this foundation we derive a precise formal framework — Bidirectional Constraint Closure (BCC) — in which spacetime distance is the inverse of constraint coherence, time is generated by irreversible constraint renegotiation, energy is constraint renegotiation rate, quantum uncertainty is minimum Act granularity, and consciousness is constraint closure experienced from inside a sufficiently recursive system. We show that the hard problem of consciousness and the quantum measurement problem are the same problem, and that both dissolve when the Act is recognized as the shared primitive. We establish convergences with four independent theoretical traditions — Vedanta, Goswami's quantum idealism, thermodynamic approaches to gravity, and quantum information theory — and argue that their independent arrival at the same structural conclusions constitutes significant evidence. We state four precisely formulated open mathematical problems whose solution would constitute a complete formal derivation of standard physics and a formal dissolution of the hard problem. This paper synthesizes and unifies the Schoff Research Program series into a single coherent argument. Keywords: constraint dynamics, consciousness, wave function collapse, quantum gravity, emergent spacetime, hard problem, measurement problem, Reflective Interface, Dimension W, Bidirectional Constraint Closure, co-primitive, Vedanta, Jacobson, holographic principle, retrocausal attractor, Theory of Everything Correspondence Email: Kiba3030@gmail.com
The genesis of actuality from potentiality, with the apparent role of the observer, is an important and unsolved problem which essentially defines science‟s view of reality in a variety of contexts. Observation then becomes lawful and not emergent. Panentheism is needed to provide a mechanism for order outside of blind efficient causality, in a Universal final causality. Classical physics is over a hundred years out of date, yet scientific models remain mechanistic and deterministic. Deism, a remnant of classical cosmology, is examined and rejected by scientists and philosophers, and certain pre-scientific notions of religion are scorned, putting the matter to rest. Quantum physics, in its basic form, is necessary if there is to be any philosophical or scientific notion of free will and self-determination, as potentiality. Quantum metaphysics is also needed because classical physics is fundamentally limited to localized external relations, lacking the internality and non-locality of relatedness. God, or the equivalent, is necessary to complete the equation. Physicists now tell us that reality is fundamentally mental and is created by observation. Observation is here taken to mean experience, with experience going all the way down to the lowest order of a Universal mentality.
This paper addresses the long-standing challenge of unifying classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, which has puzzled the physics community for decades. Most existing frameworks are built on the foundations of material particles and spacetime, neglecting consciousness as an independent physical entity. Here, I propose a novel hypothesis: the Consciousness Energy (CE) theory, which posits that consciousness energy is the fundamental form of the universe. Without mass or physical substance, it evolves autonomously, iterates, and remains stable across dimensions. Based on this idea, I construct a three-tiered cosmic model: the high-dimensional consciousness origin, the intermediate dimensional buffer layer, and the low-dimensional material world we inhabit. This framework provides a consistent explanation for seemingly contradictory phenomena, such as quantum entanglement, the observer effect, black hole singularities, and the vibrational nature of strings. It unifies classical and quantum mechanics: the former describes the behavior of condensed consciousness energy in the material world, while the latter reflects the free characteristics of consciousness in its primordial state. This theory aligns with concepts in traditional Chinese philosophy, such as inner observation and spiritual cultivation, which are essentially practices to purify and strengthen consciousness energy, aiming to transcend dimensional constraints and return to the origin. The framework is logically self-consistent and compatible with established physical laws, offering a new perspective for the study of a "theory of everything".
Key Areas of the Consciousness Physics Research Project (Phase II)•The Temic Big Bang Cosmology (also called the Temifa Big Bang Cosmology)•CEN (consciousness-energy): The cenforms•Mathematical Frameworks for the following and their subsections: oEntanglement Is Fundamental to the Universe: The Temic Principle of Consciousness Entanglement (the Beginning)oGravity: A consequence of Big Bang expansion/explosion by Fundamental Consciousness, a natural forceoThe Temic Theory of GravityoThe Temic Big Bang Principle: A generalization of the Big Bang in the Standard Big Bang ModeloThe Temic Uncertainty Principle: A generalization of Heisenberg's Uncertainty PrincipleoThe Temic Superposition Principle: A generalized version of the superposition principleoThe Temic Principle of Consciousness-Energy Conservation: A generalized version of the principle of conservation of energyoThe Temic Wave-Particle Duality: A generalization of the Wave-Particle Duality of MatteroQuantization of ConwavesoObjectivity, Observation, Measurement, and SubjectivityoThe Temic Principle of CoherenceoThe Temic Principle of Conscious PerceptionoThe Temic Relativity Principle: Reality Is Both Local and Non-Local•The Periodic Table of Lifeforms on Earth (PTL)•CEN: The Theory of Everything•Nature of existence and space-time in Consciousness Mechanics•Further Predictions of The StudyoApplications