Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ERFT and the Deterministic Energy--Information Substrate:Foundations, Emergent Quantum Phenomena, and Implications for Scalable Quantum Computing

Mora Arias, R.

Published Nov 17, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Energetic Resonance Field Theory (ERFT), combined with the deterministic energy--information substrate that underlies the theory, provides a physical mechanism from which quantum-like behavior emerges. In this framework, superposition, quantization and entanglement arise as resonant, phase-coherent modes of the substrate rather than as intrinsically probabilistic axioms. If ERFT is experimentally verified, the consequences for quantum technologies are profound: by controlling the substrate modes directly, one may achieve robust coherence, tunable entanglement, deterministic multi-qubit interactions, and quantum processors of arbitrary scale. This paper formalizes these implications, establishes the theoretical basis for emergent quantum behavior in ERFT, and proposes the architecture for next-generation quantum computers unconstrained by the decoherence limits of standard quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.17634887

Related papers

Emergent Entanglement in Energy Resonance Field Theory (ERFT): Numerical Evidence From Covariance-Coupled Substrate Modes

Mora Arias, R.

We present the first numerical evidence that the Energy Resonance Field Theory (ERFT) supports emergent entanglement-like correlations through deterministic substrate field dynamics.Simulations of a discretized ERFT field reveal structured long-range covariance, fractal mode grouping, spectral coherence, and a robust entanglement proxy across spatial blocks.This demonstrates that entanglement need not be a fundamental postulate but can instead be an emergent collective effect of a deeper relativistic substrate.We derive the theoretical conditions for mode-locking, present the numerical pipeline used to obtain the results, compare the findings with standard quantum mechanics and Bell-theorem constraints, and discuss the implications for scalable quantum computation.

•Nov 17, 2025•0 citations

Completing Quantum Theory: A Proposal for a Deterministic Substrate Field, Hidden Variables, and the Limits of Scalable Quantum Computation

Mora Arias, R

We propose a novel conceptual framework — the Deterministic Substrate Field (DSF) theory — aimed at completing quantum mechanics via locally deterministic hidden variables defined on a substrate field $\Phi(\mathbf{x},t)$. The DSF reconstructs quantum states as effective statistical descriptions emergent from coarse-graining of substrate trajectories. We derive formal relations linking DSF variables to observed quantum amplitudes, show how entanglement and superposition arise from substrate correlations, and analyze how the substrate dynamics place fundamental constraints on multi-qubit coherence and resource scaling. We propose falsifiable experimental protocols (weak tomography divergences, non-equilibrium signatures, scaling anomalies in GHZ and cluster states, decoherence reversibility tests and hidden-parameter inference) that would either reveal the substrate variables or demonstrate their practical inaccessibility. We discuss why the DSF may render large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computation physically infeasible, and outline possible new theoretical frameworks to replace or extend quantum mechanics if the substrate hypothesis is confirmed or shown untestable.

•Nov 19, 2025•0 citations

Paper 14 — Quantum Emergence from Coherence Fluctuations

A L DeVilliers

This paper is part of the Aetherium Foundations Phase, which develops the formal field equations, emergent geometry, and theoretical structure underlying the Aetherium substrate. This paper develops the quantum‑mechanical side of the Aetherium framework, deriving quantum behavior from coherence fluctuations, resonance structure, and substrate‑level phase dynamics. It complements Paper 13’s derivation of emergent geometry and prepares the ground for numerical simulations in Paper 15. Quantum Emergence from Coherence Fluctuations develops the quantum‑mechanical side of the Aetherium framework, complementing Paper 13’s derivation of emergent geometry. In this work, quantum behavior arises from fluctuations, resonance structure, and phase dynamics of the underlying coherence substrate. Coherence amplitude and substrate phase give rise to quantum‑like complex amplitudes; resonance‑compatible trajectories generate a path‑integral‑like transition structure; and resonance locking produces discrete, stable modes corresponding to quantized energy levels. Shared resonance structure explains entanglement, while measurement corresponds to coherence reconfiguration into the nearest stable resonance mode. Classical behavior emerges from rapid phase scrambling in large systems. This paper establishes quantum mechanics as an emergent, resonance‑driven phenomenon within the Aetherium substrate and prepares the ground for Paper 15, which develops numerical simulations of coherence dynamics. Revision 1 adds a papragraph about recent ultrafast measurements of bright squeezed vacuum (BSV) pulses.

•Mar 30, 2026•0 citations

Paper IV: The Substrate Field as the Origin of Microscopic Phenomena: A Foundation Without Quantum Postulates

Jiacheng Yang

The substrate field theory, developed in the first three papers of this series, posits a universal physical medium whose rigidity K and effective density ρ₀ determine the speed of light and whose dissipation governs cosmological redshift and orbital decay. In this paper, we show that the same substrate field naturally gives rise to all quantum phenomena as emergent properties of its microscopic structure. The substrate is assumed to possess a discrete granularity at a fundamental scale l₀, leading to quantization of energy and momentum. Linear excitations of the substrate—wave packets—exhibit wave–particle duality. The linearity of the wave equation allows coherent superpositions, giving rise to superposition and entanglement. The substrate's inherent dissipation provides a physical mechanism for decoherence, resolving the measurement problem without invoking a conscious observer. The Heisenberg uncertainty relation emerges as a Fourier property of wave packets in the substrate. Thus quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory but an effective description of substrate dynamics at microscopic scales. This framework unifies quantum phenomena with classical physics, cosmology, and thermodynamics, eliminating the need for quantum postulates and explaining the apparent "weirdness" of the quantum world as natural consequences of a physical medium.Part IV of the Substrate Field Theory series

•Mar 26, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Field Architecture - Substrate Geometry and the Mechanics of Reality

Dustin Lee

The universe operates as a dynamic geometric substrate, a continuous, tension-bearing field whose stable and metastable configurations produce every particle, force, and interaction catalogued by modern physics. All quantum phenomena historically labeled "weird," "probabilistic," or "fundamentally inexplicable" are, without exception, deterministic mechanical outputs of substrate geometry modes. This paper maps ten core quantum behaviors, superposition, wavefunction collapse, entanglement, tunneling, zero-point energy, particle identity, fundamental forces, measurement, quantum stability, and decoherence, to their precise substrate geometry counterparts and develops a unified mechanical picture of reality from the ground up. The Unified Substrate Theory (UST) and its applied framework, Quantum Field Architecture (QFA), do not supplement existing quantum interpretations: they replace them with a physically grounded, mechanistically explicit, testable geometric model. No mysticism required. No dice-rolling God required. Just geometry, all the way down. I learned all of this from my favorite scientist and then kept pushing his ideas.

•Sep 16, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Measurement as Coherence Reconfiguration in Aetherium

A L DeVilliers

This paper is part of the Aetherium Foundations Phase, which develops the formal field equations, emergent geometry, and theoretical structure underlying the Aetherium substrate. The quantum measurement problem arises from the tension between the linear, deterministic evolution of quantum states and the emergence of single, definite outcomes in measurement. Standard formulations introduce collapse postulates or interpretive overlays but provide no physically grounded mechanism for outcome selection within a single world. The Aetherium framework resolves this tension by introducing a pre‑geometric substrate whose intrinsic property is coherence, constrained by the resonant structure of the substrate. Quantum states are coarse‑grained descriptions of coherence patterns, and measurement corresponds to a coherence‑reconfiguration event in which the combined system–apparatus coherence aligns with a resonance‑compatible configuration. Decoherence stabilizes this configuration by redistributing coherence across many degrees of freedom, while probabilities arise from the relative stability of resonant attractor states, yielding the Born rule as a structural consequence of the substrate’s resonance architecture. This coherence‑first ontology provides a single‑world, realist, and local account of measurement that preserves the empirical success of quantum theory while eliminating collapse, branching, and observer‑dependence. The result is a unified and physically meaningful foundation for understanding the quantum‑to‑classical transition.

•Feb 10, 2026•0 citations
Energetic Resonance Field Theory (ERFT), combined with the deterministic energy--information substrate that underlies the theory, provides a physical mechanism from which quantum-like behavior emerges. In this framework, superposition, quantization and entanglement arise as resonant, phase-coherent modes of the substrate rather than as intrinsically probabilistic axioms. If ERFT is experimentally verified, the consequences for quantum technologies are profound: by controlling the substrate modes directly, one may achieve robust coherence, tunable entanglement, deterministic multi-qubit interactions, and quantum processors of arbitrary scale. This paper formalizes these implications, establishes the theoretical basis for emergent quantum behavior in ERFT, and proposes the architecture for next-generation quantum computers unconstrained by the decoherence limits of standard quantum mechanics.
We present the first numerical evidence that the Energy Resonance Field Theory (ERFT) supports emergent entanglement-like correlations through deterministic substrate field dynamics.Simulations of a discretized ERFT field reveal structured long-range covariance, fractal mode grouping, spectral coherence, and a robust entanglement proxy across spatial blocks.This demonstrates that entanglement need not be a fundamental postulate but can instead be an emergent collective effect of a deeper relativistic substrate.We derive the theoretical conditions for mode-locking, present the numerical pipeline used to obtain the results, compare the findings with standard quantum mechanics and Bell-theorem constraints, and discuss the implications for scalable quantum computation.
We propose a novel conceptual framework — the Deterministic Substrate Field (DSF) theory — aimed at completing quantum mechanics via locally deterministic hidden variables defined on a substrate field Φ(x,t)\Phi(\mathbf{x},t)Φ(x,t). The DSF reconstructs quantum states as effective statistical descriptions emergent from coarse-graining of substrate trajectories. We derive formal relations linking DSF variables to observed quantum amplitudes, show how entanglement and superposition arise from substrate correlations, and analyze how the substrate dynamics place fundamental constraints on multi-qubit coherence and resource scaling. We propose falsifiable experimental protocols (weak tomography divergences, non-equilibrium signatures, scaling anomalies in GHZ and cluster states, decoherence reversibility tests and hidden-parameter inference) that would either reveal the substrate variables or demonstrate their practical inaccessibility. We discuss why the DSF may render large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computation physically infeasible, and outline possible new theoretical frameworks to replace or extend quantum mechanics if the substrate hypothesis is confirmed or shown untestable.
This paper is part of the Aetherium Foundations Phase, which develops the formal field equations, emergent geometry, and theoretical structure underlying the Aetherium substrate. This paper develops the quantum‑mechanical side of the Aetherium framework, deriving quantum behavior from coherence fluctuations, resonance structure, and substrate‑level phase dynamics. It complements Paper 13’s derivation of emergent geometry and prepares the ground for numerical simulations in Paper 15. Quantum Emergence from Coherence Fluctuations develops the quantum‑mechanical side of the Aetherium framework, complementing Paper 13’s derivation of emergent geometry. In this work, quantum behavior arises from fluctuations, resonance structure, and phase dynamics of the underlying coherence substrate. Coherence amplitude and substrate phase give rise to quantum‑like complex amplitudes; resonance‑compatible trajectories generate a path‑integral‑like transition structure; and resonance locking produces discrete, stable modes corresponding to quantized energy levels. Shared resonance structure explains entanglement, while measurement corresponds to coherence reconfiguration into the nearest stable resonance mode. Classical behavior emerges from rapid phase scrambling in large systems. This paper establishes quantum mechanics as an emergent, resonance‑driven phenomenon within the Aetherium substrate and prepares the ground for Paper 15, which develops numerical simulations of coherence dynamics. Revision 1 adds a papragraph about recent ultrafast measurements of bright squeezed vacuum (BSV) pulses.
The substrate field theory, developed in the first three papers of this series, posits a universal physical medium whose rigidity K and effective density ρ₀ determine the speed of light and whose dissipation governs cosmological redshift and orbital decay. In this paper, we show that the same substrate field naturally gives rise to all quantum phenomena as emergent properties of its microscopic structure. The substrate is assumed to possess a discrete granularity at a fundamental scale l₀, leading to quantization of energy and momentum. Linear excitations of the substrate—wave packets—exhibit wave–particle duality. The linearity of the wave equation allows coherent superpositions, giving rise to superposition and entanglement. The substrate's inherent dissipation provides a physical mechanism for decoherence, resolving the measurement problem without invoking a conscious observer. The Heisenberg uncertainty relation emerges as a Fourier property of wave packets in the substrate. Thus quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory but an effective description of substrate dynamics at microscopic scales. This framework unifies quantum phenomena with classical physics, cosmology, and thermodynamics, eliminating the need for quantum postulates and explaining the apparent "weirdness" of the quantum world as natural consequences of a physical medium.Part IV of the Substrate Field Theory series
The universe operates as a dynamic geometric substrate, a continuous, tension-bearing field whose stable and metastable configurations produce every particle, force, and interaction catalogued by modern physics. All quantum phenomena historically labeled "weird," "probabilistic," or "fundamentally inexplicable" are, without exception, deterministic mechanical outputs of substrate geometry modes. This paper maps ten core quantum behaviors, superposition, wavefunction collapse, entanglement, tunneling, zero-point energy, particle identity, fundamental forces, measurement, quantum stability, and decoherence, to their precise substrate geometry counterparts and develops a unified mechanical picture of reality from the ground up. The Unified Substrate Theory (UST) and its applied framework, Quantum Field Architecture (QFA), do not supplement existing quantum interpretations: they replace them with a physically grounded, mechanistically explicit, testable geometric model. No mysticism required. No dice-rolling God required. Just geometry, all the way down. I learned all of this from my favorite scientist and then kept pushing his ideas.
This paper is part of the Aetherium Foundations Phase, which develops the formal field equations, emergent geometry, and theoretical structure underlying the Aetherium substrate. The quantum measurement problem arises from the tension between the linear, deterministic evolution of quantum states and the emergence of single, definite outcomes in measurement. Standard formulations introduce collapse postulates or interpretive overlays but provide no physically grounded mechanism for outcome selection within a single world. The Aetherium framework resolves this tension by introducing a pre‑geometric substrate whose intrinsic property is coherence, constrained by the resonant structure of the substrate. Quantum states are coarse‑grained descriptions of coherence patterns, and measurement corresponds to a coherence‑reconfiguration event in which the combined system–apparatus coherence aligns with a resonance‑compatible configuration. Decoherence stabilizes this configuration by redistributing coherence across many degrees of freedom, while probabilities arise from the relative stability of resonant attractor states, yielding the Born rule as a structural consequence of the substrate’s resonance architecture. This coherence‑first ontology provides a single‑world, realist, and local account of measurement that preserves the empirical success of quantum theory while eliminating collapse, branching, and observer‑dependence. The result is a unified and physically meaningful foundation for understanding the quantum‑to‑classical transition.