Generalized Dyson Series, The Feynman Integral And Feynman’s Operational Calculus

Gerald W Johnson, Michel L Lapidus

Published Mar 16, 2000• 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The reader will recall that the first part of Section 14.5 introduced some of the ideas of this chapter. The present section continues this introduction but with an emphasis on the role played by the discrete part of the measures η that are involved.

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198535744.003.0015

Related papers

The Feynman Integral and Feynman’s Operational Calculus

Gerald W Johnson, Michel L Lapidus

Abstract The aim of this book is to make accessible to mathematicians, physicists and other scientists interested in qunatum theory, the beautiful but mathematically difficult subjects of the Feynman integral and Feynman's operational calculus. Some advantages of the approaches to the Feynman integral which are treated in detail in this book are the following: the existence of the Feynman integral is established for very general potentials in all four cases; under more restrictive but still broad conditions, three of these Feynman integrals agree with one another and with the unitary group from the usual approach to quantum dynamics; these same three Feynman integrals possess pleasant stability properties. Much of the material covered here was previously available only in the research literature, and the book also contains some new results. The background material in mathematics and physics that motivates the study of the Feynman integral and Feynman's operational calculus is discussed, and detailed proofs are provided for the central results.

Mar 16, 20004 citations

The Feynman integral and Feynman's operational calculus : a heuristic and mathematical introduction

Michel L. Lapidus

Annales mathématiques Blaise PascalJan 1, 19960 citations

Series expansions and their summation

R. J. Rivers

Let us recapitulate. Although the form (4.32) for the path integral was motivated by analogy with finite-dimensional integrals, in no way is it a definition. Rather, as we have stressed repeatedly, it is an algorithm for handling the Feynman perturbation series. Strong coupling apart, all the manipulations of the path integral that we have performed (integration by parts, the introduction of auxiliary fields, the inclusion of background fields) stand in one-to-one correspondence to rearrangements of the perturbation series. In fact, path integrals are unnecessary in the derivation of expressions like (4.50). See Fried (1972), for example. The path integrals are as rigorous – or non-rigorous – as the series, irrespective of whether they can be given proper mathematical definition or not. At the same time, the analogy with finite-dimensional integrals suggests approaches that go beyond this purely operational stance. In particular, because of the dominant role played by the classical action in the path integral formalism we would like to use it to establish the relation of quantum dynamics to classical dynamics. This is the most compelling reason for introducing the path integral formalism, requiring a distinct relaxation in our treatment of it. By formal analogy with finite-dimensional saddle-point and stationary-phase methods, elevating the classical action to the phase of the integrand promotes series expansions in ħ as the natural way to proceed.

Cambridge University Press eBooksNov 12, 19870 citations

Mathematics of the Feynman path integral

Vassili Nikitich Kolokoltsov

(and its generalisations that include magnetic fields) can be roughly divided into two classes. In the aproaches of the first class that we shall not discuss here in detail the Feynman integral is not supposed to be a genuine integral, but is specified as some generalised functional on an appropriate space of functions, which can be defined, for example, as the limit of certain discrete approximations (see e.g. [16], [44] and more recent papers [24], [25], [34]), by means of analytical continuation (see e.g. [26], [23] and references therein), by extensions of Parceval’s identity and by related axiomatic definitions (see [2], [5], [30], [11], [42] and references therein) or by means of the white noise analysis (see [22]), see also [46] for the discussion of path integral applied to the Dirac equation. These approaches still cover only a very restrictive class of potentials, for example, singular potentials were considered only by white noise analysis approach but only in one-dimensional case (see e.g. [6] and references therein). In the approaches of the second class, one tries to define the infinite-dimensional Feynmann integral as a genuine integral over a bona fide σ-additive measure on an appropriate space of trajectories. The first attempt made in [19] to construct such a measure was erronious and led to understanding that there is no direct generalisation of Wiener measure that can give an analog of FeynmanKac formula for the case of Schrodinger operators. A correct construction of the Feynman integral in terms of the Wiener measure was proposed in [15] and was based on the idea of the rotation of the classical trajectories in complex

Jan 1, 20012 citations

Operator functionals and path integrals

C. Kourkoumelis, Stephen J. Nettel

In a paper entitled ’’An Operator Calculus Having Applications in Quantum Electrodynamics’’ [Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951)], Feynman gives techniques and theorems for working with ordered operators. We believe that the entire development, because of its direct involvement in the transition from the Heisenberg–Schrödinger to Feynman’s path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics, is of general interest. We aim to make these less appreciated early techniques of Feynman more accessible to the general physicist.

American Journal of PhysicsJan 1, 19772 citations

Renormalization

James Jeffrey Binney, N J Dowrick, Andrew J. Fisher +1 more

Abstract In Chapter 7 we introduced the Landau-Ginzburg ‘metamoder of phase transitions. The model’s partition function takes the form of a functional integral which cannot be done exactly. So in the last chapter we expressed this integral as an infinite series of functional integrals that can be reduced to ordinary multi-dimensional integrals. To keep track of these integrals we associated with each a Feynman diagram and used these diagrams to classify the integrals by the number of integrations or ‘loops’ each involves.

Jun 11, 19920 citations