Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the frontiers of physics : philosophical bases for a logical interpretation of modern physics

Fernando Goñi Arregui

Published Jan 1, 1989• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Philosophical Frontiers of Physics.

Vincent Edward Smith

•Jan 1, 1947•1 citation

Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics

Peter Mittelstaedt

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1976•57 citations

Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics

P. T. Landsberg, Peter Mittelstaedt, W. Reimer

Leonardo•Jan 1, 1979•5 citations

Philosophical problems of modern physics

H. S. Plendl

Reidel eBooks•Jan 1, 1982•3 citations

The philosophical basis of physics

Gerd Buchdahl

Contemporary Physics•Jun 1, 1962•2 citations

Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory

Henry Margenau

Recent discussions in the physical literature, designed to clarify the logical position of modern physical theory, have brought to light an amazing divergence of fundamental attitudes which may well bewilder the careful student of physics as well as philosophy. Quantum mechanics, representing an abstract formalism, should be capable of having its logical structure analyzed with great precision like any other mathematical discipline. Its consequences in all problems to which its method can be applied are so unambiguous, consistent, and successful in predicting physical experience as to disperse immediately all thoughts of possible discrepancies in its fundamental texture. Yet it must be said that even the founders of quantum theory are not in harmony in their various expositions of the bases of that theory. However, while this situation seems disquieting on the face of it, there is no cause for serious brow raising, for it is a fact that there exists agreement with regard to the central axioms of the theory, and that the ambiguities affect only their philosophical interpretation, a field in which differences of opinion may at present be honestly entertained.

Philosophy of Science•Jul 1, 1937•58 citations
Recent discussions in the physical literature, designed to clarify the logical position of modern physical theory, have brought to light an amazing divergence of fundamental attitudes which may well bewilder the careful student of physics as well as philosophy. Quantum mechanics, representing an abstract formalism, should be capable of having its logical structure analyzed with great precision like any other mathematical discipline. Its consequences in all problems to which its method can be applied are so unambiguous, consistent, and successful in predicting physical experience as to disperse immediately all thoughts of possible discrepancies in its fundamental texture. Yet it must be said that even the founders of quantum theory are not in harmony in their various expositions of the bases of that theory. However, while this situation seems disquieting on the face of it, there is no cause for serious brow raising, for it is a fact that there exists agreement with regard to the central axioms of the theory, and that the ambiguities affect only their philosophical interpretation, a field in which differences of opinion may at present be honestly entertained.