Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics

Complementarity of Structure and Dynamics

Harald Atmanspacher A

Published Jan 1, 1991• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-2305-9_17

Related papers

The complementarity principle in biological and social structures

Howard Hunt Pattee

Journal of Social and Biological Systems•Apr 1, 1978•107 citations

The Complementarity Principle in Biological and Social Structures

Howard Hunt Pattee

Biosemiotics/Biosemiotics. Bookseries•Jan 1, 2012•2 citations

Complementarity in Classical Dynamical Systems

Peter beim Graben, Harald Atmanspacher A

arXiv:nlin/0407046•Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 2006•67 citations

Structure and Flow Observables in Complementarity Dynamics of Open Two-Qubit Systems

Matthias Jakob

We study complementarity dynamics in open two-qubit systems through the local budgetBA = P2A+ V 2A + C2 and its deficit DA = 1 − BA. The purpose is not to define a newnon-Markovianity measure, but to distinguish two diagnostic roles. Structure observablesdescribe how predictability, visibility, concurrence, and deficit are arranged along a statespacetrajectory, whereas flow observables record temporal recovery. Amplitude-damping anddephasing prototypes, finite parameter scans, BLP-like comparisons, and two analyticallysolvable Bell-sector results show that ΔD is mainly structural, while NC and N−D respond torevival windows. The framework therefore clarifies what complementarity budgets certify inopen two-qubit dynamics.

•Jun 5, 2026•0 citations

Aspects of Complementarity

Robert Vallée

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Niels Bohr's Complementarity: Its Structure, History, and Intersections with Hermeneutics and Deconstruction

Makoto Katsumori

This book explores the modern physicist Niels Bohr’s philosophical thought, specifically his pivotal idea of complementarity, with a focus on the relation between the roles of what he metaphorically calls “spectators” and “actors.” It seeks to spell out the structural and historical complexity of the idea of complementarity in terms of different modes of the ‘spectator-actor’ relation, showing, in particular, that the reorganization of Bohr’s thought starting from his 1935 debate with Einstein and his collaborators is characterized by an extension of the dynamic conception of complementarity from non-physical contexts to the very field of quantum theory. Further, linked with this analysis, the book situates Bohr’s complementarity in contemporary philosophical context by examining its intersections with post-Heideggerian hermeneutics as well as Derridean deconstruction. Specifically, it points to both the close affinities and the differences between Bohr’s idea of the ‘actor-spectator’ relation and the hermeneutic notion of the relation between “belonging” and “distanciation.”

•Sep 1, 2011•8 citations
We study complementarity dynamics in open two-qubit systems through the local budgetBA = P2A+ V 2A + C2 and its deficit DA = 1 − BA. The purpose is not to define a newnon-Markovianity measure, but to distinguish two diagnostic roles. Structure observablesdescribe how predictability, visibility, concurrence, and deficit are arranged along a statespacetrajectory, whereas flow observables record temporal recovery. Amplitude-damping anddephasing prototypes, finite parameter scans, BLP-like comparisons, and two analyticallysolvable Bell-sector results show that ΔD is mainly structural, while NC and N−D respond torevival windows. The framework therefore clarifies what complementarity budgets certify inopen two-qubit dynamics.
This book explores the modern physicist Niels Bohr’s philosophical thought, specifically his pivotal idea of complementarity, with a focus on the relation between the roles of what he metaphorically calls “spectators” and “actors.” It seeks to spell out the structural and historical complexity of the idea of complementarity in terms of different modes of the ‘spectator-actor’ relation, showing, in particular, that the reorganization of Bohr’s thought starting from his 1935 debate with Einstein and his collaborators is characterized by an extension of the dynamic conception of complementarity from non-physical contexts to the very field of quantum theory. Further, linked with this analysis, the book situates Bohr’s complementarity in contemporary philosophical context by examining its intersections with post-Heideggerian hermeneutics as well as Derridean deconstruction. Specifically, it points to both the close affinities and the differences between Bohr’s idea of the ‘actor-spectator’ relation and the hermeneutic notion of the relation between “belonging” and “distanciation.”