Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Spin squeezing as a measure of entanglement in a two-qubit system (4 pages)

Azeddine Messikh

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Spin squeezing and entanglement in a dispersive cavity (4 pages)

M. Sebaweh Abdalla, Ram Narayan Deb

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Thermal Entanglement Properties in two Kinds of Two-qubit Spin Squeezing Model

Yang Guo-Hui

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Feb 15, 2016•9 citations

Entanglement Teleportation via Two-Qubit Spin Squeezing Model

Wang Rong, Yang Guo-Hui

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 9, 2015•5 citations

Thermal Entanglement Properties in Two Qubits One-Axis Spin Squeezing Model with an External Magnetic Field

Saeed Haddadi, Ahmad Akhound

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 27, 2018•15 citations

Measurable entanglement criterion for two qubits (4 pages)

Hoshang Heydari

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Spin squeezing as a measure of entanglement in a two-qubit system

Azeddine Messikh, Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

We show that the two definitions of spin squeezing extensively used in the literature [M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993) and D.J. Wineland et al., Phys. Rev. A 50, 67 (1994)] give different predictions of entanglement in the two-atom Dicke system. We analyze differences between the definitions and show that the spin squeezing parameter of Kitagawa and Ueda is a better measure of entanglement than the commonly used spectroscopic spin squeezing parameter. We illustrate this relation by examining different examples of a driven two-atom Dicke system in which spin squeezing and entanglement arise dynamically. We give an explanation of the source of the difference using the negativity criterion for entanglement.

arXiv:quant-ph/0305166•Physical Review A•Dec 5, 2003•25 citations
We show that the two definitions of spin squeezing extensively used in the literature [M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993) and D.J. Wineland et al., Phys. Rev. A 50, 67 (1994)] give different predictions of entanglement in the two-atom Dicke system. We analyze differences between the definitions and show that the spin squeezing parameter of Kitagawa and Ueda is a better measure of entanglement than the commonly used spectroscopic spin squeezing parameter. We illustrate this relation by examining different examples of a driven two-atom Dicke system in which spin squeezing and entanglement arise dynamically. We give an explanation of the source of the difference using the negativity criterion for entanglement.