Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

On Subsystem Recognition in Compound Physical Systems

Frank Valckenborgh

Published Mar 1, 2000• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1003699518261

Related papers

Description of Compound Physical Systems and Logical Interaction of Physical Systems

Dirk Aerts

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1981•19 citations

Locality and orthomodular structure of compound systems

Teppei Watanabe

A P-lattice is defined as a σ-complete, orthomodular atomic lattice ℒ which is formed by the set of propositions of a physical system. A composition of physical systems in the framework of P-lattices is considered and some notions of locality are given. It is shown that the following statements about compound systems are equivalent. (a) All atoms of a compound system are reducible to those of its subsystems. (b) All pure states of a compound system are separable into those of its subsystems. (c) A compound system has statistical property independence. (d) At least one of the subsystems is classical. (e) Bell-type inequalities hold.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 16, 2004•5 citations

Coupled physical systems

David J. Foulis

Foundations of Physics•Jul 1, 1989•32 citations

A characterization of subsystems in physics

Dirk Aerts, Ingrid C. Daubechies

Letters in Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1979•23 citations

Compound System

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

Composition of Different and of Identical Systems It is a general tendency of physics to interpret physical systems as composed of simpler, more elementary subsystems. The question “What is it made of?” is a very tempting and popular one. Though this attitude does not reflect a logical necessity, it has proved to be successful in significant circumstances: we think, e.g., of macroscopic matter as composed of atoms and molecules, of molecules as composed of atoms, of atoms as composed of nuclei and electrons, and of nuclei as composed of protons and neutrons. Loosely speaking, one might expect that this attitude will be successful whenever the interaction that packs the constituent subsystems together is not strong enough to make them lose their identity. Here, we are concerned with the problem of constructing the quantum-mechanical formalism of a compound system knowing the formalisms of the constituent subsystems. Thus our first problem is to specify the Hilbert space of the compound system. For the sake of simplicity, let us restrict ourselves to the case of a system composed of only two subsystems. The prescriptions of quantum theory vary according to whether one is faced with the composition of identical or nonidentical subsystems.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1984•0 citations

Modelling Quantum Subsystem Dynamics

Jason Dominy, Alireza Shabani, Daniel A. Lidar

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2016•0 citations
A P-lattice is defined as a σ-complete, orthomodular atomic lattice ℒ which is formed by the set of propositions of a physical system. A composition of physical systems in the framework of P-lattices is considered and some notions of locality are given. It is shown that the following statements about compound systems are equivalent. (a) All atoms of a compound system are reducible to those of its subsystems. (b) All pure states of a compound system are separable into those of its subsystems. (c) A compound system has statistical property independence. (d) At least one of the subsystems is classical. (e) Bell-type inequalities hold.
Composition of Different and of Identical Systems It is a general tendency of physics to interpret physical systems as composed of simpler, more elementary subsystems. The question “What is it made of?” is a very tempting and popular one. Though this attitude does not reflect a logical necessity, it has proved to be successful in significant circumstances: we think, e.g., of macroscopic matter as composed of atoms and molecules, of molecules as composed of atoms, of atoms as composed of nuclei and electrons, and of nuclei as composed of protons and neutrons. Loosely speaking, one might expect that this attitude will be successful whenever the interaction that packs the constituent subsystems together is not strong enough to make them lose their identity. Here, we are concerned with the problem of constructing the quantum-mechanical formalism of a compound system knowing the formalisms of the constituent subsystems. Thus our first problem is to specify the Hilbert space of the compound system. For the sake of simplicity, let us restrict ourselves to the case of a system composed of only two subsystems. The prescriptions of quantum theory vary according to whether one is faced with the composition of identical or nonidentical subsystems.