Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

春の分科会講演予稿集

27a-L-9 Superconducting Flux phase of the t-J model

源 多々良, 哲生 松居

Published Mar 11, 1991• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Flux Phase and Its Competition with Superconductivity in the t–J Model

E. Cappelluti, R. Zeyher

Journal of Superconductivity•Feb 1, 1999•0 citations

Commensurate flux phase of the Heisenberg model and anyonic superconductivity

Asim Gangopadhyaya, Prasanta Kumar Panigrahi

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Competition of an incommensurate flux phase and superconductivity in a t–J model with Coulomb interactions

E. Cappelluti, R. Zeyher

Physica C Superconductivity•Feb 1, 1999•5 citations

Interplay of superconductivity with structural phases in a generalized t-J model

Zeyher, R., Cappelluti, E.

The phase diagram of the t-J-V model is discussed using a 1/N expansion in terms of X operators. It is shown that a flux phase of d-wave symmetry is stabilized by the Coulomb interaction V at intermediate dopings and competes with d-wave superconductivity. Since the flux wave instability is stronger than the superconducting one optimal doping is essentially determined by the onset of the flux phase. Below optimal doping the flux phase coexists with superconductivity at low and exists as a pseudo gap phase at higher temperatures. It is also found that the flux phase boundary is much less sensitive to impurity scattering than the boundary for superconductivity in agreement with experiments in Zn doped La-214 and (Y,Ca)-123.

•Jan 1, 2000•1 citation

Superconductivity in the Two-Dimensional t-J Model.

幸則 太田, R. Eder, 禎通 前川

日本物理學會誌•Jan 1, 1995•3 citations

t−J model for a bilayer: Coexisting superconductivity and planar-flux phases

Hongbo Zhao, Jan R. Engelbrecht

We study the bilayer generalization of the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model with both hopping and exchange coupling between the two layers. Within the enlarged mean-field parameter space, we find dimerized, $s+id$, flux ladder and planar flux phases. Of particular interest is the planar flux phase that persists farther away from half-filling, and coexists with, and even stabilizes, ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$-superconductivity. The orbital currents in the phase generate staggered moments that are rotated away from the $c$-axis.

arXiv:cond-mat/0110356•Physical Review B•Feb 15, 2005•13 citations
The phase diagram of the t-J-V model is discussed using a 1/N expansion in terms of X operators. It is shown that a flux phase of d-wave symmetry is stabilized by the Coulomb interaction V at intermediate dopings and competes with d-wave superconductivity. Since the flux wave instability is stronger than the superconducting one optimal doping is essentially determined by the onset of the flux phase. Below optimal doping the flux phase coexists with superconductivity at low and exists as a pseudo gap phase at higher temperatures. It is also found that the flux phase boundary is much less sensitive to impurity scattering than the boundary for superconductivity in agreement with experiments in Zn doped La-214 and (Y,Ca)-123.
We study the bilayer generalization of the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model with both hopping and exchange coupling between the two layers. Within the enlarged mean-field parameter space, we find dimerized, s+ids+ids+id, flux ladder and planar flux phases. Of particular interest is the planar flux phase that persists farther away from half-filling, and coexists with, and even stabilizes, ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$-superconductivity. The orbital currents in the phase generate staggered moments that are rotated away from the ccc-axis.