Monotone metrics and measures

Abstract

Probability theory is a measure theory – with a soul. Mark Kac Section 2.6 was devoted to classical ensembles , that is to say ensembles defined by probability measures on the set of classical probability distributions over N events. In this chapter quantum ensembles are defined by choosing probability measures on the set of density matrices of size N . A warning should be issued first: there is no single, naturally distinguished measure in M ( N ) , so we have to analyse several measures, each of them with different physical motivations, advantages and drawbacks. This is in contrast to the set of pure quantum states, where the Fubini–Study measure is the only natural choice for a measure that defines ‘random states’. A simple way to define a probability measure goes through a metric. Hence we will start this chapter with a review of the metrics defined on the set of mixed quantum states. Monotone metrics In Section 2.5 we explained how the Fisher metric holds its distinguished position due to the theorem of Čencov, which states that the Fisher metric is the unique monotone metric on the probability simplex Δ N –1 . Now that the latter has been replaced by the space of quantum states M ( N ) we must look again at the question of metrics. Since the uniqueness in the classical case came from the behaviour under stochastic maps, we turn our attention to stochastic quantum maps – the completely positive, trace preserving maps discussed in Chapter 10. A distance D in the space of quantum states M ( N ) is called monotone if it does not grow under the action of a stochastic map Φ, If a monotone distance is geodesic the corresponding metric on M ( N ) is called monotone.