Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Zeno Effect in the Measurement Problem

Mikio Namiki, Saverio Pasaczio

Published Jan 1, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Critically analyzing the so-called quantum Zeno effect in the measurement problem, we show that observation of this effect does not necessarily mean experimental evidence for the naive notion of wave-function collapse by measurement (the simple projection rule). We also examine what kind of limitation the uncertainty relation and others impose on the observation of the quantum Zeno effect.

Related papers

Dynamical quantum Zeno effect

Saverio Pascazio, Mikio Namiki

A purely dynamical explanation for the quantum Zeno effect is proposed. It is argued that a quantum system undergoes a quantum-Zeno-type dynamics as a consequence of a particular type of evolution involving a series of frequent spectral decompositions. The role of quantum measurements and of the ``collapse of the wave function'' is investigated and it is clarified that, provided a final observation is performed, the dynamical quantum Zeno effect can be obtained without making use of von Neumann's projection postulate. The meaning of infinitely frequent measurements is critically discussed and it is argued that it should be regarded as a mathematical idealization, impossible to realize from a physical point of view.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1994•124 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum Zeno effect’’

L. E. Ballentine

The quantum Zeno effect is not a general characteristic of continuous measurements. In a recently reported experiment [Itano et al., Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)], the inhibition of atomic excitation and deexcitation is not due to any ``collapse of the wave function,'' but instead is caused by a very strong perturbation due to the optical pulses and the coupling to the radiation field. The experiment should not be cited as providing empirical evidence in favor of the notion of ``wave-function collapse.''

Physical Review A•May 1, 1991•84 citations

Quantum Zeno effect without collapse of the wave packet

Vera Frerichs, Axel Schenzle

The change of dynamics in a quantum system under frequent or continuous observation, known as the quantum Zeno effect, is generally derived from the projection or reduction of the wave-packet hypothesis that is the central postulate in the theory of quantum measurements. The only experiment in which the Zeno effect has yet been clearly demonstrated, though, allows no conclusion on the necessity or validity of the projection postulate. This is shown by calculating, in detail, the outcome of the experiment on the basis of the standard three-level Bloch equations. These equations follow from the quantum theory of irreversible processes with no additional assumptions necessary, such as which part of the system serves as measuring apparatus or how efficient the measurement would be.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1991•118 citations

Quantum Zeno effect and quantum Zeno paradox in atomic physics

Ellen Block, P. R. Berman

Itano and co-workers [Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)] have recently reported the experimental verification of the quantum Zeno effect, which is the inhibition of a quantum transition by frequent measurements. In this article, we offer an alternative interpretation of the quantum Zeno effect. We show that an analysis of the dynamics of the full three-level system gives the same result. There is no need to assume explicitly that the wave function has collapsed, nor even to assume that an ideal measurement has been made. In addition, we differentiate between what has been referred to as the quantum Zeno effect and what has been termed the quantum Zeno paradox. The former is the inhibition of induced transitions, and the latter is the, as yet experimentally unobserved, inhibition of spontaneous decay. Our interpretation, which emphasizes the ``measurement''-induced interruption of atomic-state coherences as the cause of inhibited quantum transitions, suggests a resolution to the quantum Zeno paradox. The theoretical limit of continuous observation is discussed.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1991•72 citations

Incomplete ‘‘collapse’’ and partial quantum Zeno effect

Asher Peres, Amiram Ron

If the interaction generating a quantum measurement is too weak to completely ''collapse'' the wave function, a partial quantum Zeno effect may result. An experimental test is proposed.Received 4 April 1990DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.5720©1990 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1990•101 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum Zeno effect’’’

Wayne M. Itano, Daniel J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger +1 more

Various interpretations of quantum mechanics are valid insofar as they predict the same experimental results. Some invoke ``wave-function collapse'' and some do not. An interpretation based on the collapse postulate provides a simple explanation for a recent experimental demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect [Itano et al., Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)], but other interpretations are also valid.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1991•74 citations
Critically analyzing the so-called quantum Zeno effect in the measurement problem, we show that observation of this effect does not necessarily mean experimental evidence for the naive notion of wave-function collapse by measurement (the simple projection rule). We also examine what kind of limitation the uncertainty relation and others impose on the observation of the quantum Zeno effect.
A purely dynamical explanation for the quantum Zeno effect is proposed. It is argued that a quantum system undergoes a quantum-Zeno-type dynamics as a consequence of a particular type of evolution involving a series of frequent spectral decompositions. The role of quantum measurements and of the ``collapse of the wave function'' is investigated and it is clarified that, provided a final observation is performed, the dynamical quantum Zeno effect can be obtained without making use of von Neumann's projection postulate. The meaning of infinitely frequent measurements is critically discussed and it is argued that it should be regarded as a mathematical idealization, impossible to realize from a physical point of view.
The quantum Zeno effect is not a general characteristic of continuous measurements. In a recently reported experiment [Itano et al., Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)], the inhibition of atomic excitation and deexcitation is not due to any ``collapse of the wave function,'' but instead is caused by a very strong perturbation due to the optical pulses and the coupling to the radiation field. The experiment should not be cited as providing empirical evidence in favor of the notion of ``wave-function collapse.''
The change of dynamics in a quantum system under frequent or continuous observation, known as the quantum Zeno effect, is generally derived from the projection or reduction of the wave-packet hypothesis that is the central postulate in the theory of quantum measurements. The only experiment in which the Zeno effect has yet been clearly demonstrated, though, allows no conclusion on the necessity or validity of the projection postulate. This is shown by calculating, in detail, the outcome of the experiment on the basis of the standard three-level Bloch equations. These equations follow from the quantum theory of irreversible processes with no additional assumptions necessary, such as which part of the system serves as measuring apparatus or how efficient the measurement would be.
Itano and co-workers [Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)] have recently reported the experimental verification of the quantum Zeno effect, which is the inhibition of a quantum transition by frequent measurements. In this article, we offer an alternative interpretation of the quantum Zeno effect. We show that an analysis of the dynamics of the full three-level system gives the same result. There is no need to assume explicitly that the wave function has collapsed, nor even to assume that an ideal measurement has been made. In addition, we differentiate between what has been referred to as the quantum Zeno effect and what has been termed the quantum Zeno paradox. The former is the inhibition of induced transitions, and the latter is the, as yet experimentally unobserved, inhibition of spontaneous decay. Our interpretation, which emphasizes the ``measurement''-induced interruption of atomic-state coherences as the cause of inhibited quantum transitions, suggests a resolution to the quantum Zeno paradox. The theoretical limit of continuous observation is discussed.