Holographic nature of quantum reality

P Kuyukov Vitaly

Ken Levi

The famous Double Slit Experiment (DSE) changed our concept of reality. It led to the view that the basic building blocks of matter and energy can take the form of either waves or particles, and what makes the difference is whether or not they are observed. As Niels Bohr concluded, “Until we’re conscious of something, it doesn’t exist.” A new theory of consciousness, however, suggests a different interpretation of the DSE results. The theory of the Holographic Mind (HM) contains many of the same elements as the DSE. In particular, the HM describes how observation converts wave patterns into 3D images. This suggests that the same DSE dynamics which led researchers to upend our notion of reality, might be less about the nature of reality, than about how we derive information about reality; that is, the nature of perception.

Silvio Bergia

Norbert Bedoucha

This conceptual paper proposes a layered interpretive framework for reality organized into four domains: Idea, Script, Production, and Interpretation (ISPI). The framework explores symbolic systems as possible observer-mediated recoveries of deeper structural constraints rather than purely arbitrary inventions. The paper examines whether experienced reality may be understood as a staged manifestation of underlying organization and considers conceptual parallels with holographic interpretations of physical reality. It further explores whether the coexistence of successful but incomplete physical descriptions may reflect access to different layers of manifestation rather than a failure of unification. This work is philosophical and conceptual in nature and does not propose a new physical theory.

悠輝 中口

Blind Review

The main philosophical lesson of holographic gravity is that spatiotemporal descriptions of a field theory may not be respected by observational reality. We apply this lesson to the correspondence principle, and then later justify the lesson (holographic correspondence) without necessitating such spatiotemporal deviations via the law of large numbers in statistics, applied to an average of n quantum measurements. Classical observables are considered to emerge as n approaches infinity. The averaging approach can be interpreted both as a generalization of Bohr's correspondence principle (large number limit) and Planck's correspondence principle (Planck's constant approaching zero). Holographic correspondence and the averaging approach are then re-analyzed in light of preceding works in the correspondence principle. A key consequential lesson is that we should not conflate the nature of fundamental theory observables with that of emergent theory observables, and once this confusion is avoided, the correspondence principle has a solid standing.