Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nanoscience and technology

The Tunneling Time Problem Revisited

N. Yamada

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-05084-2_6

Related papers

A note on the tunneling time problem

Francis E. Low, Paul F. Mende

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1991•61 citations

The “Tunneling-Time Problem” for Electrons

C. Richard Leavens

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•10 citations

On the Olkhovsky-Recami approach to the “tunneling time problem”

C. Richard Leavens

Solid State Communications•Jan 1, 1993•15 citations

Reply to Comment on 'The quantum mechanical tunnelling time problem-revisited'

David Lowe, Stephen P. Collins

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Dec 30, 1988•8 citations

On the universal tunneling time

Günter Nimtz

Journal of Lasers Optics & Photonics•Jul 27, 2018•0 citations

Comment on 'The quantum mechanical tunnelling time problem-revisited'

Μ. Büttiker, Rolf W. Landauer

When a particle tunnels through a barrier it interacts with that barrier for a time that has been analysed by the authors. An appreciable number of other investigators have, with modest variations, come to the same result. Collins, Lowe and Barker (1987) have criticised this approach and advocated an older answer which depends primarily on the phase changes encountered at the turning points of the barrier, and not on barrier thickness, nor on the exact potential variation within the barrier. This is a rebuttal of their criticism.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Dec 30, 1988•38 citations
When a particle tunnels through a barrier it interacts with that barrier for a time that has been analysed by the authors. An appreciable number of other investigators have, with modest variations, come to the same result. Collins, Lowe and Barker (1987) have criticised this approach and advocated an older answer which depends primarily on the phase changes encountered at the turning points of the barrier, and not on barrier thickness, nor on the exact potential variation within the barrier. This is a rebuttal of their criticism.