Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

源流

区別のつかない粒子たち:--- Quantum Indistinguishability ---

Y. Yamamoto

Published Jan 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

区別のつかない粒子たち--Quantum Indistinguishability (特集 量子の世界)

Y. Yamamoto

源流•Sep 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Identity and Indistinguishability

Holger Lyre

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2018•1 citation

Indistinguishability of states for composite quantum system

Chengjun Wu, Junhui Li, Bin Luo +1 more

We consider the states of composite system from quantum probabilistic amplitude superposition, and define the local indistinguishability (LID) and nonlocal indistinguishability (NLID). For pure states, the NLID is the same as nonlocal coherence. NLID can be considered as the measure of entanglement. LID can be considered as the measure of quantum correlation. From this respect, entanglement, which must have probabilistic amplitude superposition between product basis, is explicitly different from other quantum correlation. LID and NLID are also generalized to multipartite cases. These results are useful in the exploration of the distinctive quantum feature of quantum systems.

arXiv:1405.1109•May 6, 2014•0 citations

Indistinguishability, the Pauli Principle (Quantum Mechanics)

Springer eBooks•Jan 20, 2006•0 citations

Quantum Statistical Witness Indistinguishability

Shafik Nassar, Ramachandran, Ronak

Statistical witness indistinguishability is a relaxation of statistical zero-knowledge which guarantees that the transcript of an interactive proof reveals no information about which valid witness the prover used to generate it. In this paper we define and initiate the study of QSWI, the class of problems with quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proofs. Using inherently quantum techniques from Kobayashi (TCC 2008), we prove that any problem with an honest-verifier quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proof has a 3-message public-coin malicious-verifier quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proof. There is no known analogue of this result for classical statistical witness indistinguishability. As a corollary, our result implies SWI is contained in QSWI. Additionally, we extend the work of Bitansky et al. (STOC 2023) to show that quantum batch proofs imply quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proofs with inverse-polynomial witness indistinguishability error.

arXiv:2509.01945•Sep 2, 2025•0 citations

Ontological indistinguishability as a central tenet of quantum theory

J. Acácio de Barros, Federico Holik

Quantum indistinguishability directly relates to the philosophical debate on the notions of identity and individuality. They are crucial for our understanding of multipartite quantum systems. Furthermore, the correct interpretation of this feature of quantum theory has implications that transcend fundamental science and philosophy, given that quantum indistinguishability is a resource in quantum information theory. Most of the conceptual analysis of quantum indistinguishability is restricted to studying the permutational invariance of quantum states, the concomitant quantum statistics and their entanglement. Here, we analyse the role of indistinguishability and non-individuality in other areas of quantum theory. We start by analysing how a very peculiar use of indistinguishability underlies Feynman's rules for summing amplitudes in interference phenomena. Next, we study how quantum indistinguishability is underestimated in several topics of debate in the quantum physics literature, such as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's inequalities and the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. Finally, we argue that an ontology of truly indistinguishable entities can serve as a basis for a quantum ontology that can give interesting answers to the interpretational problems of quantum mechanics. We claim that, in addition to superposition, contextuality and entanglement, indistinguishability (understood in a robust ontological sense) is one of the central features of quantum physics. This article is part of the theme issue 'Identity, individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jul 30, 2023•2 citations
We consider the states of composite system from quantum probabilistic amplitude superposition, and define the local indistinguishability (LID) and nonlocal indistinguishability (NLID). For pure states, the NLID is the same as nonlocal coherence. NLID can be considered as the measure of entanglement. LID can be considered as the measure of quantum correlation. From this respect, entanglement, which must have probabilistic amplitude superposition between product basis, is explicitly different from other quantum correlation. LID and NLID are also generalized to multipartite cases. These results are useful in the exploration of the distinctive quantum feature of quantum systems.
Statistical witness indistinguishability is a relaxation of statistical zero-knowledge which guarantees that the transcript of an interactive proof reveals no information about which valid witness the prover used to generate it. In this paper we define and initiate the study of QSWI, the class of problems with quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proofs. Using inherently quantum techniques from Kobayashi (TCC 2008), we prove that any problem with an honest-verifier quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proof has a 3-message public-coin malicious-verifier quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proof. There is no known analogue of this result for classical statistical witness indistinguishability. As a corollary, our result implies SWI is contained in QSWI. Additionally, we extend the work of Bitansky et al. (STOC 2023) to show that quantum batch proofs imply quantum statistically witness indistinguishable proofs with inverse-polynomial witness indistinguishability error.
Quantum indistinguishability directly relates to the philosophical debate on the notions of identity and individuality. They are crucial for our understanding of multipartite quantum systems. Furthermore, the correct interpretation of this feature of quantum theory has implications that transcend fundamental science and philosophy, given that quantum indistinguishability is a resource in quantum information theory. Most of the conceptual analysis of quantum indistinguishability is restricted to studying the permutational invariance of quantum states, the concomitant quantum statistics and their entanglement. Here, we analyse the role of indistinguishability and non-individuality in other areas of quantum theory. We start by analysing how a very peculiar use of indistinguishability underlies Feynman's rules for summing amplitudes in interference phenomena. Next, we study how quantum indistinguishability is underestimated in several topics of debate in the quantum physics literature, such as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's inequalities and the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. Finally, we argue that an ontology of truly indistinguishable entities can serve as a basis for a quantum ontology that can give interesting answers to the interpretational problems of quantum mechanics. We claim that, in addition to superposition, contextuality and entanglement, indistinguishability (understood in a robust ontological sense) is one of the central features of quantum physics. This article is part of the theme issue 'Identity, individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics'.