The Aharonov-Bohm effect is one of the most comprehensible examples of quantum non-locality. The so called molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect displays great similarities with the latter, but still, we show how this effect can be explained using arguments relying solely on locality, whereby we mean that the effect can be traced down to a force acting locally on the phase space distribution. Our method hinges on studying the system in its momentum representation, and introducing a conjugate gauge which render an everywhere non-zero synthetic magnetic field. The resulting Lorenz force induces a transverse current which can be attributed the equivalence of an intrinsic spin Hall effect. The idea is demonstrated for the linear Exe Jahn-Teller model and applied to the Li3 molecule, for which its corresponding Hamiltonian is obtained by diabatization of ab intio determined adiabatic potential energy surfaces.
The Aharonov-Bohm effect is one of the most comprehensible examples of quantum non-locality. The so called molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect displays great similarities with the latter, but still, we show how this effect can be explained using arguments relying solely on locality, whereby we mean that the effect can be traced down to a force acting locally on the phase space distribution. Our method hinges on studying the system in its momentum representation, and introducing a conjugate gauge which render an everywhere non-zero synthetic magnetic field. The resulting Lorenz force induces a transverse current which can be attributed the equivalence of an intrinsic spin Hall effect. The idea is demonstrated for the linear Exe Jahn-Teller model and applied to the Li3 molecule, for which its corresponding Hamiltonian is obtained by diabatization of ab intio determined adiabatic potential energy surfaces.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential A, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics A is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than B in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant B field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the B field in the region inaccessible to the particle.
The nonlocal and topological nature of the molecular Aharonov-Bohm (MAB) effect is examined for real electronic Hamiltonians. A notion of preferred gauge for MAB is suggested. The MAB effect in the linear + quadratic Eotimesepsilon Jahn-Teller system is shown to be essentially analogues to an anisotropic Aharonov-Casher effect for an electrically neutral spin−1/2 particle encircling a certain configuration of lines of charge.
The most popular interpretation of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect is that the electromagnetic potential locally affects the complex phase of a charged particle’s wave function in the magnetic field free region. However, since the vector potential is a gauge-variant quantity, multiple researchers suspect that it is just a convenient tool for calculating the force field. This motivates them to explain the AB effect without using the vector potential, which inevitably leads to some sort of non-locality. This frustrating situation is shortly summarized by the statement by Aharonov et al. that the AB effect may be due to a local gauge potential or due to non-local gauge-invariant fields. In the present paper, we shall give several convincing arguments which support the viewpoint that the vector potential is not just a convenient mathematical tool with little physical entity. Despite its gauge arbitrariness, the vector potential certainly contains a gauge-invariant piece, which solely explains the observed AB phase shift. Importantly, this component has a property such that it is basically unique and cannot be eliminated by any regular gauge transformations. To complete the discussion, we also discuss the role of remaining gauge arbitrariness still contained in the entire vector potential.
In the context of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, it is well-known that the local action of the vector potential or the non-local action of the magnetic field are properties attributable to quantum physics, which can explain the observed Aharonov-Bohm phase. Here we point out that, surprisingly, these properties are also attributable to classical physics and that this result follows from examining the electromagnetic angular momentum of a static electric charge outside an infinitely-long solenoid of finite radius carrying a uniform magnetic flux. This angular momentum may be expressed in three equivalent forms. The first form shows that there is an electromagnetic angular momentum even in regions for which the magnetic field vanishes but the potential does not, which stresses the physical nature of the vector potential in classical physics. The second form shows that there is an electromagnetic angular momentum produced by the non-local action of the magnetic field. The third form shows that the Aharonov-Bohm phase is proportional to the magnitude of the electromagnetic angular momentum, which sheds light on the physical meaning of this phase.
The Aharonov-Bohm effect is a quantum mechanical effect, that is, has no classical counterpart. The effect was predicted in 1959 in a seminal paper of Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm [AB59] in which they demonstrated that a beam of electrons is affected by the existence of the electric/magnetic field even though electrons travel through field-free regions. Aharonov and Bohm carried out two hypothetical experiments to support their claim that potentials are more fundamental than fields and they are respon-sible of the effect. Since then, the debate has arisen around whether potentials are mathematical tools or fundamental entities in physics. Different arguments have been set to explain the results predicted by Aharonov and Bohm and experimentally confirmed. Amongst these arguments, the first argument adopted by Aharonov and Bohm was that potentials are physically significant. Many have claimed that fields do have non-local features, i.e. action at a distance. Others have claimed that topological effects may interpret the effect in which potentials are modeled as connections in higher-dimensional fiber bun-dle geometries. The most recent argument has been proposed by Vaidman [Vai12] who claimed that the the composite system is represented by one state, an entangled state, and due to the electromagnetic interactions part of this state is changed, hence, the total state. In the present essay, I will discuss the latter argument as well as reviewing some other arguments. i
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, wherein an electron acquires a phase shift in a field-free region due to electromagnetic potentials, poses a profound challenge to the ontology of quantum mechanics and gauge theories. This paper demonstrates that gauge-invariant explanations, which attribute the phase to measurable quantities, rely on nonlocal and discontinuous mechanism and fail to account for its continuous accumulation along the electron's path—a process evident in the generalized AB effect, where a time-varying magnetic flux induces a phase that builds gradually over time, as predicted by quantum mechanics. Through a new analysis spanning quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, I argue that the electromagnetic potentials Aμ, fixed in the Lorenz gauge, emerge as the fundamental physical reality, offering a local, relativistically consistent account of the phase’s generation. This exclusion of gauge-invariant paradigms reverberates across gauge theories: it redefines the Higgs mechanism, favoring dynamic potentials over static invariants, and extends to general relativity, where gravitational potentials gμν may anchor spacetime’s substantival reality via a gravitational AB effect. By unraveling the AB phase’s continuous generation—locally mediated by potentials—this study not only addresses a long-standing conundrum but also bridges electromagnetic, gravitational, and Yang-Mills frameworks, offering a unified potential-centric perspective with novel implications for physics and philosophy.