Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Holt, Rinehart and Winston eBooks

Modern physics : an introduction to its mathematical language

William A. Blanpied

Published Jan 1, 1971• 12 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Introduction to Modern Physics

Nature•Feb 1, 1935•13 citations

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Unitext•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Unitext•Jan 1, 2010•2 citations

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Aug 28, 2015•2 citations

Physical models realizing the transformer architecture of large language models

Chen, Zeqian

The introduction of the transformer architecture in 2017 marked the most striking advancement in natural language processing. The transformer is a model architecture relying entirely on an attention mechanism to draw global dependencies between input and output. However, we believe there is a gap in our theoretical understanding of what the transformer is, and how it works physically. From a physical perspective on modern chips, such as those chips under 28nm, modern intelligent machines should be regarded as open quantum systems beyond conventional statistical systems. Thereby, in this paper, we construct physical models realizing large language models based on a transformer architecture as open quantum systems in the Fock space over the Hilbert space of tokens. Our physical models underlie the transformer architecture for large language models.

arXiv:2507.13354•May 21, 2025•0 citations

A Common Relational Language for Physics

일진 김

Modern physics is highly successful within its individualtheoretical domains, yet its major branches often employ different mathematical formalisms, terminologies,and conceptual organizations. Classical mechanics, electromagnetism, relativity, quantum mechanics, quantumfield theory, and cosmology are each internally sophisticated, but the physical relations represented by theirequations are not always expressed through a single common conceptual language.This paper proposes a relational framework intendedto provide such a common language.The central hypothesis is not that the existing theoriesare physically incorrect or that their mathematical formalisms should be replaced. Rather, the paper investigates whether apparently different physical descriptionscan be reorganized around a common relational structure:

•Sep 12, 2026•0 citations
The introduction of the transformer architecture in 2017 marked the most striking advancement in natural language processing. The transformer is a model architecture relying entirely on an attention mechanism to draw global dependencies between input and output. However, we believe there is a gap in our theoretical understanding of what the transformer is, and how it works physically. From a physical perspective on modern chips, such as those chips under 28nm, modern intelligent machines should be regarded as open quantum systems beyond conventional statistical systems. Thereby, in this paper, we construct physical models realizing large language models based on a transformer architecture as open quantum systems in the Fock space over the Hilbert space of tokens. Our physical models underlie the transformer architecture for large language models.
Modern physics is highly successful within its individualtheoretical domains, yet its major branches often employ different mathematical formalisms, terminologies,and conceptual organizations. Classical mechanics, electromagnetism, relativity, quantum mechanics, quantumfield theory, and cosmology are each internally sophisticated, but the physical relations represented by theirequations are not always expressed through a single common conceptual language.This paper proposes a relational framework intendedto provide such a common language.The central hypothesis is not that the existing theoriesare physically incorrect or that their mathematical formalisms should be replaced. Rather, the paper investigates whether apparently different physical descriptionscan be reorganized around a common relational structure: