We have created the architecture of a quantum multicomputer and analyzed its performance for running Shor’s algorithm for factoring large numbers. In this paper, we combine fault-tolerance techniques with performance goals for our architecture, which uses a linear interconnect and six logical qubits per node. Our performance target of factoring a 1,024-bit number in one month requires teleporting 6.2 logical qubits per second on each link in the system, which translates to 3,300 physical teleportations per second on each link. A qubus-based interconnect generates Bell pairs of intermediate fidelity that must be purified. Starting from a Bell state with fidelity F = 0.638, as a qubus-based cavity QED interconnect might generate with a qubit-to-qubit loss of 3.4dB, about 1.5 million physical entanglement attempts per second are enough to reach this level of performance.
We have created the architecture of a quantum multicomputer and analyzed its performance for running Shor’s algorithm for factoring large numbers. In this paper, we combine fault-tolerance techniques with performance goals for our architecture, which uses a linear interconnect and six logical qubits per node. Our performance target of factoring a 1,024-bit number in one month requires teleporting 6.2 logical qubits per second on each link in the system, which translates to 3,300 physical teleportations per second on each link. A qubus-based interconnect generates Bell pairs of intermediate fidelity that must be purified. Starting from a Bell state with fidelity F = 0.638, as a qubus-based cavity QED interconnect might generate with a qubit-to-qubit loss of 3.4dB, about 1.5 million physical entanglement attempts per second are enough to reach this level of performance.
The quantum multicomputer consists of a large number of small nodes and a qubus interconnect for creating entangled state between the nodes. The primary metric chosen is the performance of such a system on Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers: specifically, the quantum modular exponentiation step that is the computational bottleneck. This dissertation introduces a number of optimizations for the modular exponentiation. My algorithms reduce the latency, or circuit depth, to complete the modular exponentiation of an n-bit number from O(n^3) to O(n log^2 n) or O(n^2 log n), depending on architecture. Calculations show that these algorithms are one million times and thirteen thousand times faster, when factoring a 6,000-bit number, depending on architecture. Extending to the quantum multicomputer, five different qubus interconnect topologies are considered, and two forms of carry-ripple adder are found to be the fastest for a wide range of performance parameters. The links in the quantum multicomputer are serial; parallel links would provide only very modest improvements in system reliability and performance. Two levels of the Steane [[23,1,7]] error correction code will adequately protect our data for factoring a 1,024-bit number even when the qubit teleportation failure rate is one percent.
The quantum multicomputer consists of a large number of small nodes and a qubus interconnect for creating entangled state between the nodes. The primary metric chosen is the performance of such a system on Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers: specifically, the quantum modular exponentiation step that is the computational bottleneck. This dissertation introduces a number of optimizations for the modular exponentiation. My algorithms reduce the latency, or circuit depth, to complete the modular exponentiation of an n-bit number from O(n^3) to O(n log^2 n) or O(n^2 log n), depending on architecture. Calculations show that these algorithms are one million times and thirteen thousand times faster, when factoring a 6,000-bit number, depending on architecture. Extending to the quantum multicomputer, five different qubus interconnect topologies are considered, and two forms of carry-ripple adder are found to be the fastest for a wide range of performance parameters. The links in the quantum multicomputer are serial; parallel links would provide only very modest improvements in system reliability and performance. Two levels of the Steane [[23,1,7]] error correction code will adequately protect our data for factoring a 1,024-bit number even when the qubit teleportation failure rate is one percent.
We evaluate the performance of quantum arithmetic algorithms run on a distributed quantum computer (a quantum multicomputer). We vary the node capacity and I/O capabilities, and the network topology. The tradeoff of choosing between gates executed remotely, through "tele-ported gates" on entangled pairs of qubits (telegate), versus exchanging the relevant qubits via quantum teleportation, then executing the algorithm using local gates (tele-data), is examined. We show that the teledata approach performs better, and that carry-ripple adders perform well when the teleportation block is decomposed so that the key quantum operations can be parallelized. A node size of only a few logical qubits performs adequately provided that the nodes have two transceiver qubits. A linear network topology performs acceptably for a broad range of system sizes and performance parameters. We therefore recommend pursuing small, high-I/O bandwidth nodes and a simple network. Such a machine will run Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers efficiently
We evaluate the performance of quantum arithmetic algorithms run on a distributed quantum computer (a quantum multicomputer). We vary the node capacity and I/O capabilities, and the network topology. The tradeoff of choosing between gates executed remotely, through “teleported gates” on entangled pairs of qubits (telegate), versus exchanging the relevant qubits via quantum teleportation, then executing the algorithm using local gates (teledata), is examined. We show that the teledata approach performs better, and that carry-ripple adders perform well when the teleportation block is decomposed so that the key quantum operations can be parallelized. A node size of only a few logical qubits performs adequately provided that the nodes have two transceiver qubits. A linear network topology performs acceptably for a broad range of system sizes and performance parameters. We therefore recommend pursuing small, high-I/O bandwidth nodes and a simple network. Such a machine will run Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers efficiently.
Practical fault-tolerant quantum computation requires a large number of physical qubits, posing a major challenge for scaling up individual quantum processors. Distributed architectures offer a promising solution by interconnecting multiple processors through quantum networks. However, remote Bell-pair generation remains technically demanding, making it essential to assess computational performance under limited communication resources. In this work, we present a comprehensive resource analysis of distributed fault-tolerant quantum computation using superconducting processors connected by microwave or optical links. We show that even a single physical communication channel per node can substantially reduce the physical-qubit requirements per node under experimentally motivated, forward-looking microwave-link assumptions of a 1 MHz physical Bell-pair generation rate and 90% fidelity, although at the cost of a roughly tenfold increase in execution time. Conversely, reducing the execution-time overhead requires substantially greater communication resources, including higher Bell-pair fidelities and extensive multiplexing. These results demonstrate the potential feasibility of distributed fault-tolerant quantum computation with limited communication resources and provide a quantitative basis for balancing quantum-link performance, processor size, and execution time.
We evaluate the performance of quantum arithmetic algorithms run on a distributed quantum computer (a quantum multicomputer). We vary the node capacity and I/O capabilities, and the network topology. The tradeoff of choosing between gates executed remotely, through "teleported gates" on entangled pairs of qubits (telegate), versus exchanging the relevant qubits via quantum teleportation, then executing the algorithm using local gates (teledata), is examined. We show that the teledata approach performs better, and that carry-ripple adders perform well when the teleportation block is decomposed so that the key quantum operations can be parallelized. A node size of only a few logical qubits performs adequately provided that the nodes have two transceiver qubits. A linear network topology performs acceptably for a broad range of system sizes and performance parameters. We therefore recommend pursuing small, high-I/O bandwidth nodes and a simple network. Such a machine will run Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers efficiently.