By now, the classical ideal gas should be a familiar system. We can turn to the full quantum theory of an ideal gas. The applications are numerous, and some will be examined in chapter 9. The present chapter develops an effective technique for working with a quantum ideal gas. Coping with many particles all at once Every macroscopic system consists of a great many individual particles. Coping with all of them simultaneously, even if only statistically, can be a daunting task. A flow chart will help us to see some of our accomplishments and to see what steps lie ahead. Figure 8.1 displays such a chart on the supposition that the system consists of one species of particle only, for example, N electrons or N helium atoms (of a specific isotope). If the forces between the particles must be included, then the analysis is difficult. Moreover, there is no general algorithm for proceeding, not even by computer. To be sure, the canonical probability distribution usually is applicable and provides estimates in principle, but the actual evaluation of the partition function, say, defies a direct approach. We have, however, successfully dealt with one such difficult situation. The Debye model for a solid incorporates the inter-particle forces, for example, those between adjacent copper atoms in a crystal. The forces ensure that the motions of adjacent atoms are correlated, and the correlation leads to sound waves, the theoretical basis of the Debye model.
By now, the classical ideal gas should be a familiar system. We can turn to the full quantum theory of an ideal gas. The applications are numerous, and some will be examined in chapter 9. The present chapter develops an effective technique for working with a quantum ideal gas. Coping with many particles all at once Every macroscopic system consists of a great many individual particles. Coping with all of them simultaneously, even if only statistically, can be a daunting task. A flow chart will help us to see some of our accomplishments and to see what steps lie ahead. Figure 8.1 displays such a chart on the supposition that the system consists of one species of particle only, for example, N electrons or N helium atoms (of a specific isotope). If the forces between the particles must be included, then the analysis is difficult. Moreover, there is no general algorithm for proceeding, not even by computer. To be sure, the canonical probability distribution usually is applicable and provides estimates in principle, but the actual evaluation of the partition function, say, defies a direct approach. We have, however, successfully dealt with one such difficult situation. The Debye model for a solid incorporates the inter-particle forces, for example, those between adjacent copper atoms in a crystal. The forces ensure that the motions of adjacent atoms are correlated, and the correlation leads to sound waves, the theoretical basis of the Debye model.
Abstract Chapter 11 presents a statistical mechanical treatment of the quantum ideal gases, i.e., the ideal Boltzmann, fermion, and boson gases. The discussion begins with the microscopic description and the solution of the eigenvalue problem for a quantum ideal gas. It is argued that calculating the partition function is most readily accomplished in the grand canonical ensemble using a second-quantized formulation. When the particles are distinguishable, the equation of state is identical to that of a classical ideal gas. For fermions and bosons, however, the problem of computing thermodynamic properties is significantly more complex and can only be solved exactly in certain limits. Away from these limits approximations are needed and are discussed in detail. The relevant distributions - the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions are derived. The local density approximation of density functional theory is derived for the ideal electron gas. For the ideal boson gas, the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation is discussed
In the first three chapters we have considered problems related to the physical behaviour of one or a few particles (or some other physical objects which can be effectively described by one or a few (quasi)particles as, e.g., the random walk model in polymer physics considered in chapter 1). Though quantum field theory describes systems with an arbitrary number of degrees of freedom (an arbitrary number of (quasi)particles), in chapter 3 we actually applied it to systems with a restricted and small number of particles (e.g., for the description of the scattering process for a few particles). Another way to express this fact is to say that in chapter 3 we have considered field theories at zero temperature. However, the majority of realistic systems contain many identical (indistinguishable) particles such as atoms, electrons, photons etc. An attempt to describe these systems in terms of the individual trajectories of all particles is absolutely hopeless. Instead, we are interested in the collective behaviour of systems and describe them in terms of partition functions, mean values, correlation functions, etc. The methods of derivation, analysis and calculation of such collective characteristics constitute the subject of classical and quantum statistical mechanics.
The behavior of classical macroscopic particles – from baseballs to planets – is governed by Newtonian mechanics as we have described in the first chapters of this book. The behavior of very small particles, on the other hand, is governed by an entirely different collection of equations and rules that go under the name of “quantum mechanics” and these particles are referred to as quantum particles. These rules have analogies to classical mechanics, but are fundamentally different and somewhat mysterious as we discussed in Chapter 8. The fundamental principles of quantum mechanics cannot be proven to be correct. They were developed based on the results of experimental observation, by analogy with classical mechanics, and through the consideration of logical implications of the formalisms used. There is no way to derive the fundamental elements of quantum mechanics, any more than one could predict from first principles that Newtonian forces should add as vectors. On the other hand, quantum mechanics is among the most rigorously tested theories in science, and the predictions of quantum mechanics have, so far, always been in agreement with experiment. In this chapter, we will present quantum mechanics as a series of postulates and examine their implications in application to simple one-dimensional systems. In the next chapter we will examine quantum effects in real systems including atoms, molecules, crystals, and artificially engineered nano-structures. Postulates of quantum mechanics QM Postulate 1: A quantum particle is described by a wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) which is a function of spatial coordinates and time. All physically determinable quantities can be derived from the wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) ; quantities which cannot be found from the wave function are not physically meaningful. Note that some things that one could ask about a quantum particle, for example the exact position and simultaneous exact momentum of a particle, are not derivable from the wave function and are therefore considered indeterminate (or uncertain ). These are things which cannot ever be known about a particle, and, as such, they are meaningless to contemplate.
We found in the previous chapter that the molecular partition function is required to determine the thermodynamic properties of an ideal gas. To evaluate the partition function, specification of pertinent energy levels and degeneracies is necessary. Such knowledge demands that we investigate at least the rudiments of quantum mechanics, and especially those quantum concepts required for subsequent applications to statistical thermodynamics. For this reason, we concentrate in the next few chapters on the Schrödinger wave equation, whose various solutions provide the ε j 's and g j 's needed for the eventual calculation of thermodynamic properties. Depending on your academic background, you might thus consider reviewing classical mechanics (Appendix G) and operator theory (Appendix H) in preparation for your upcoming study of quantum mechanics. We begin this chapter with a historical review of the developments leading to the formulation of quantum mechanics, subsequently focusing on the Bohr model for atomic hydrogen and the de Broglie hypothesis for matter waves. We then introduce the Schrödinger wave equation, the basic postulates of quantum mechanics, and salient insights from these postulates germane to the development of statistical thermodynamics. We next apply the Schrödinger wave equation to the translation energy mode of an atom or molecule. This application conveniently explains both quantum states and quantum numbers, including their relation to our previous notions of microstate and macrostate. We end this chapter by discussing the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, including its utility in defining indistinguishability and symmetry conditions for multiparticle systems.
Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac statistics versus Boltzmann statistics It was remarked in Chapter 2, §2.1, that there are circumstances in which the “Boltzmann statistics” for an ideal gas – the approximation in Eq. (2.6), in which the total partition function is decomposed into a product of single-molecule partition functions, with division by N 1 ! N 2 ! … to correct for particle identity – is inaccurate even if the gas is still ideal (non-interacting particles). That happens when the number of single-particle states within the energy kT of the ground state is no longer very much greater than the number of particles. (Recall Fig. 2.1 and the accompanying discussion.) We noted that when the Boltzmann statistics is no longer an adequate approximation one must distinguish the particles as fermions, no two of which can be in the same single-particle state (counting states of different spin as different), or as bosons, for which there is no restriction on multiple occupancy of the singleparticle states. Fermions are particles of half-odd-integer spin quantum number; they could be composite particles consisting of an odd number of spin-½ particles. Protons, neutrons, and electrons, all of which are of spin ½, are fermions. Bosons are particles of integer spin; they could be spinless, or of spin 1, etc., or could be composites consisting of an even number of fermions. The nuclei of helium atoms of mass number 4 consist of two protons and two neutrons, and the neutral atom has two electrons outside the nucleus; 4 He atoms are bosons.
Introduction In most of the discussion presented so far in this book, the quantum character of atoms and electrons has been ignored. The Ising spin models have been an exception, but since the Ising Hamiltonian is diagonal (in the absence of a transverse magnetic field), all energy eigenvalues are known and the Monte Carlo sampling can be carried out just as in the case of classical statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the physical properties are in accord with the third law of thermodynamics for Ising-type Hamiltonians (e.g. entropy S and specific heat vanish for temperature T → 0, etc.) in contrast to the other truly classical models dealt with in previous chapters (e.g. classical Heisenberg spin models, classical fluids and solids, etc.) which have many unphysical low temperature properties. A case in point is a classical solid for which the specific heat follows the Dulong–Petit law, C = 3 Nk B , as T → 0, and the entropy has unphysical behavior since S → –∞. Also, thermal expansion coefficients tend to non-vanishing constants for T → 0 while the third law implies that they must be zero. While the position and momentum of a particle can be specified precisely in classical mechanics, and hence the groundstate of a solid is a perfectly rigid crystal lattice (motionless particles localized at the lattice points), in reality the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids such a perfect rigid crystal, even at T → 0, due to zero point motions which ‘smear out’ the particles over some region around these lattice points. This delocalization of quantum-mechanical particles increases as the atomic mass is reduced; therefore, these quantum effects are most pronounced for light atoms like hydrogen in metals, or liquid helium. Spectacular phenomena like superfluidity are a consequence of the quantum nature of the particles and have no classical counterpart at all. Even for heavier atoms, which do not show superfluidity because the fluid–solid transition intervenes before a transition from normal fluid to superfluid could occur, there are genuine effects of quantum nature. Examples include the isotope effects (remember that in classical statistical mechanics the kinetic energy part of the Boltzmann factor cancels out from all averages, and thus in thermal equilibrium no property depends explicitly on the mass of the particles).