Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox

F. Selleri

Published Jan 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_13

Related papers

Chapter 9. Causality in the Epr Paradox: Part 1. The Physics

Raphael Neelamkavil

Peter Lang eBooks•Jul 11, 2016•0 citations

The EPR Paradox in Particle Physics

Alexander Afriat, F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Search for New Tests of the EPR Paradox from Elementary Particle Physics

Dipankar Home

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Possible solution for EPR paradox in atomic cascade experiments

Y. Ben-Aryeh, Aharon Postan

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1992•2 citations

Discovery of the Solution to the "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox"

Roman Schnabel

In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.

quant-pharXiv:2604.09826•Apr 14, 2026•0 citations

The physical origin of the EPR paradox and how to violate Bell inequalities by macroscopical systems

Diederik Aerts

•Jan 1, 1985•19 citations
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.