Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science

Between Probabilistic and Trajectory Pictures: Revisiting Prigogine's Theory of Irreversibility

Akihiro Koide

Published Jan 1, 2025• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

One of the key objectives in the study of time in physics is to understand the emergence of macroscopic irreversibility from microscopic reversible dynamics. Prigogine proposed a worldview based on the probabilistic picture, in which irreversibility appears as a fundamental property of the dynamical system itself. This idea was formulated through the use of the complex spectral representation. On the other hand, contemporary physics in the study of isolated quantum systems with a small number of degrees of freedom explains irreversibility from the trajectory picture by using the concept of typicality. This paper reviews Prigogine's theory of irreversibility and compares it with the concept of typicality. By placing Prigogine's approach at the center, it provides a conceptual overview of how irreversibility is treated in physics, focusing on the contrast between probabilistic and trajectory pictures.

DOI
10.4288/jafpos.34.0_35

Related papers

Why irreversibility? The formulation of classical and quantum mechanics for nonintegrable systems

Ilya Prigogine

Abstract Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with a continuous spectrum (so‐called large Poincaré systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the frame of classical or quantum dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory theory and of wave‐function formalism (Schrödinger's equation). These diffusive terms correspond to well‐defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so‐called vacuum‐vacuum transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include, already, in the fundamental dynamical description the two basic aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulation of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being primitive concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville–von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature that we inherited from the nineteenth century, based, on the one hand, on dynamical time‐reversible laws and, on the other, on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory, avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger's equation, on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function, on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as many‐world theory, coarse graining, or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For large Poincaré systems (LPS), we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we have known that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of “laws of physics” dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. This formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 5, 1995•27 citations

Quantum Mechanics as a Reversible Diffusion Theory

Charalampos Antonakos

This paper proposes an interpretation of quantum mechanics, relying on the time-symmetric stochastic dynamics of quantum particles and on non-classical probability theory. Our main purpose is to demonstrate that the wave function and its complex conjugate can be interpreted as complex probability distributions in two complex diffusion equations related to non-real forward and backward in time stochastic motions respectively. We say non-real because Schroedinger forward and backward diffusions describe both reversible (real trajectories) and irreversible trajectories (non-real trajectories). The reversible trajectories are the only real trajectories and are given by the intersection of those forward and backward processes. It turns out that if we translate this intersection using set-theoretic language, we are led to a reversible diffusion described by Born rule probabilities. This proposal is useful also for explaining more about the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics that produces this so-called "wave-like" nature of quantum reality. Our perspective also challenges the notion of physical superposition and aims at a derivation of superposition principle not based on the linearity of Schroedinger's equation but relying on pure probability theory. Moreover, it is suggested that, embracing the idea of stochastic processes in quantum theory, explains the reasons for the appearance of classical behavior in large objects, in contrast to the quantum behavior of small ones. In other words, we claim that a combination of a probabilistic and no-ontic view (neither epistemic though) of the wave function with a stochastic hidden-variables approach, may provide some insight into the quantum physical reality and potentially establish the groundwork for a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2502.10523•Feb 14, 2025•0 citations

Quantum statistical mechanics, extended

William C. Schieve, Lawrence Paul Horwitz

Intrinsic theory of irreversibility In connection with the previous chapter on Wigner–Weisskopf, quantum irreversibility, Gamov states and the Lax–Phillips theory of decay, we shall examine the recent program in statistical mechanics carried forward by Ilya Prigogine and his colleagues since his early book in 1962 (Prigogine, 1962). This discussion is somewhat out of the focus of the present book, since the work to be discussed has principally been devoted to isolated quantum systems, not those in interaction with “reservoirs.” In addition, Prigogine's work is very classical in its content. We shall not attempt the task of reviewing the many changes that have taken place between 1962 and the present. Fine texts describing some of this work are those of Balescu (1963, 1975). A recent critical overview of the “modern view” is in the unpublished thesis of B. C. Bishop of the University of Texas Philosophy Department (Bishop, 1999). In many ways this is related to the use of Gel'fand triplets (Gel'fand and Vilenkin, 1968), mentioned in Chapter 17.6, to describe irreversible quantum states, i.e. Gamov states. See Chapter 17, the book of Bohm and Gadella (1989) and also the more recent review article by Bohm and colleagues (Bohm et al. , 1997). The object in statistical mechanics is to extend the range of the Liouville operator (classical and quantum) such that its eigenvalues are complex and intrinsically irreversible. Statistical mechanics has always been focused on many particle systems and the appearance of a continuum spectrum in the thermodynamic limit, already used in many places in this book. In the classical case Antoniou and Tasaki carried out the adaptation of the Gel'fand triplet approach to the Liouville operator, but this is, apparently, not possible quantum mechanically (Antoniou and Tasaki, 1993). Thus, another route must be taken in what Prigogine has termed, for emphasis, “large Poincaré systems” which have a continuum spectrum (Prigogine, 1997).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 16, 2009•0 citations

WHY IRREVERSIBILITY? THE FORMULATION OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR NONINTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

Ilya Prigogine

Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with continuous spectrum (so-called Large Poincaré Systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the framework of dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory dynamics and of wave functions. These diffusive terms correspond to well-defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so-called “vacuum-vacuum” transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include already in the fundamental dynamical description the two aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulations of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being irreducible concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville-von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature we inherited from the 19th century, based on the one hand on dynamical time-reversible laws and on the other on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger’s equation on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as the many-world theory, coarse graining or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For LPS we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions for LPS. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we know that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of "laws of physics" dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. The formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe.

International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos•Feb 1, 1995•20 citations

Understanding probability and irreversibility in the Mori-Zwanzig projection operator formalism

Michael te Vrugt

Abstract Explaining the emergence of stochastic irreversible macroscopic dynamics from time-reversible deterministic microscopic dynamics is one of the key problems in philosophy of physics. The Mori-Zwanzig (MZ) projection operator formalism, which is one of the most important methods of modern nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, allows for a systematic derivation of irreversible transport equations from reversible microdynamics and thus provides a useful framework for understanding this issue. However, discussions of the MZ formalism in philosophy of physics tend to focus on simple variants rather than on the more sophisticated ones used in modern physical research. In this work, I will close this gap by studying the problems of probability and irreversibility using the example of Grabert’s time-dependent projection operator formalism. This allows to better understand how general proposals for understanding probability in statistical mechanics, namely (a) quantum approaches and (b) almost-objective probabilities, can be accomodated in the MZ formalism. Moreover, I will provide a detailed physical analysis, based on the MZ formalism, of various proposals from the philosophical literature, such as (a) Robertson’s theory of justifying coarse-graining via autonomous macrodynamics, (b) Myrvold’s problem of explaining autonomous macrodynamics, and (c) Wallace’s simple dynamical conjecture.

arXiv:2112.04067•European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Jun 22, 2022•13 citations

An introduction to monitored quantum systems and quantum trajectories: spectrum, typicality, and phases

Ryusuke Hamazaki, Ken Mochizuki, Hisanori Oshima +1 more

Thanks to recent experimental advances in simulating and detecting quantum dynamics with high precision and controllability, our understanding of the physics of monitored quantum systems has considerably deepened over the past decades. In this article, we provide an introductory theoretical review on the basic formalisms governing open quantum dynamics under measurement, along with recent developments in their spectral and typical aspects. After reviewing quantum measurement theory, we introduce the concept of quantum trajectories, which are the conditional dynamics of monitored states shaped by a set of measurement outcomes. We then discuss the spectral properties of the dynamical map describing the evolution averaged over measurement outcomes. As has recently been recognized, these spectral features are intimately connected to whether quantum trajectories exhibit typical behaviors, such as ergodicity and purification. Moreover, we introduce Lyapunov exponents of typical quantum trajectories and discuss how these quantities serve as indicators of measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored quantum many-body systems.

cond-mat.stat-mechCross-listedarXiv:2512.19922•Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics•Dec 24, 2025•2 citations
One of the key objectives in the study of time in physics is to understand the emergence of macroscopic irreversibility from microscopic reversible dynamics. Prigogine proposed a worldview based on the probabilistic picture, in which irreversibility appears as a fundamental property of the dynamical system itself. This idea was formulated through the use of the complex spectral representation. On the other hand, contemporary physics in the study of isolated quantum systems with a small number of degrees of freedom explains irreversibility from the trajectory picture by using the concept of typicality. This paper reviews Prigogine's theory of irreversibility and compares it with the concept of typicality. By placing Prigogine's approach at the center, it provides a conceptual overview of how irreversibility is treated in physics, focusing on the contrast between probabilistic and trajectory pictures.
Abstract Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with a continuous spectrum (so‐called large Poincaré systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the frame of classical or quantum dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory theory and of wave‐function formalism (Schrödinger's equation). These diffusive terms correspond to well‐defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so‐called vacuum‐vacuum transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include, already, in the fundamental dynamical description the two basic aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulation of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being primitive concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville–von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature that we inherited from the nineteenth century, based, on the one hand, on dynamical time‐reversible laws and, on the other, on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory, avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger's equation, on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function, on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as many‐world theory, coarse graining, or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For large Poincaré systems (LPS), we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we have known that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of “laws of physics” dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. This formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
This paper proposes an interpretation of quantum mechanics, relying on the time-symmetric stochastic dynamics of quantum particles and on non-classical probability theory. Our main purpose is to demonstrate that the wave function and its complex conjugate can be interpreted as complex probability distributions in two complex diffusion equations related to non-real forward and backward in time stochastic motions respectively. We say non-real because Schroedinger forward and backward diffusions describe both reversible (real trajectories) and irreversible trajectories (non-real trajectories). The reversible trajectories are the only real trajectories and are given by the intersection of those forward and backward processes. It turns out that if we translate this intersection using set-theoretic language, we are led to a reversible diffusion described by Born rule probabilities. This proposal is useful also for explaining more about the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics that produces this so-called "wave-like" nature of quantum reality. Our perspective also challenges the notion of physical superposition and aims at a derivation of superposition principle not based on the linearity of Schroedinger's equation but relying on pure probability theory. Moreover, it is suggested that, embracing the idea of stochastic processes in quantum theory, explains the reasons for the appearance of classical behavior in large objects, in contrast to the quantum behavior of small ones. In other words, we claim that a combination of a probabilistic and no-ontic view (neither epistemic though) of the wave function with a stochastic hidden-variables approach, may provide some insight into the quantum physical reality and potentially establish the groundwork for a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Intrinsic theory of irreversibility In connection with the previous chapter on Wigner–Weisskopf, quantum irreversibility, Gamov states and the Lax–Phillips theory of decay, we shall examine the recent program in statistical mechanics carried forward by Ilya Prigogine and his colleagues since his early book in 1962 (Prigogine, 1962). This discussion is somewhat out of the focus of the present book, since the work to be discussed has principally been devoted to isolated quantum systems, not those in interaction with “reservoirs.” In addition, Prigogine's work is very classical in its content. We shall not attempt the task of reviewing the many changes that have taken place between 1962 and the present. Fine texts describing some of this work are those of Balescu (1963, 1975). A recent critical overview of the “modern view” is in the unpublished thesis of B. C. Bishop of the University of Texas Philosophy Department (Bishop, 1999). In many ways this is related to the use of Gel'fand triplets (Gel'fand and Vilenkin, 1968), mentioned in Chapter 17.6, to describe irreversible quantum states, i.e. Gamov states. See Chapter 17, the book of Bohm and Gadella (1989) and also the more recent review article by Bohm and colleagues (Bohm et al. , 1997). The object in statistical mechanics is to extend the range of the Liouville operator (classical and quantum) such that its eigenvalues are complex and intrinsically irreversible. Statistical mechanics has always been focused on many particle systems and the appearance of a continuum spectrum in the thermodynamic limit, already used in many places in this book. In the classical case Antoniou and Tasaki carried out the adaptation of the Gel'fand triplet approach to the Liouville operator, but this is, apparently, not possible quantum mechanically (Antoniou and Tasaki, 1993). Thus, another route must be taken in what Prigogine has termed, for emphasis, “large Poincaré systems” which have a continuum spectrum (Prigogine, 1997).
Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with continuous spectrum (so-called Large Poincaré Systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the framework of dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory dynamics and of wave functions. These diffusive terms correspond to well-defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so-called “vacuum-vacuum” transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include already in the fundamental dynamical description the two aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulations of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being irreducible concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville-von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature we inherited from the 19th century, based on the one hand on dynamical time-reversible laws and on the other on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger’s equation on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as the many-world theory, coarse graining or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For LPS we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions for LPS. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we know that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of "laws of physics" dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. The formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe.
Abstract Explaining the emergence of stochastic irreversible macroscopic dynamics from time-reversible deterministic microscopic dynamics is one of the key problems in philosophy of physics. The Mori-Zwanzig (MZ) projection operator formalism, which is one of the most important methods of modern nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, allows for a systematic derivation of irreversible transport equations from reversible microdynamics and thus provides a useful framework for understanding this issue. However, discussions of the MZ formalism in philosophy of physics tend to focus on simple variants rather than on the more sophisticated ones used in modern physical research. In this work, I will close this gap by studying the problems of probability and irreversibility using the example of Grabert’s time-dependent projection operator formalism. This allows to better understand how general proposals for understanding probability in statistical mechanics, namely (a) quantum approaches and (b) almost-objective probabilities, can be accomodated in the MZ formalism. Moreover, I will provide a detailed physical analysis, based on the MZ formalism, of various proposals from the philosophical literature, such as (a) Robertson’s theory of justifying coarse-graining via autonomous macrodynamics, (b) Myrvold’s problem of explaining autonomous macrodynamics, and (c) Wallace’s simple dynamical conjecture.
Thanks to recent experimental advances in simulating and detecting quantum dynamics with high precision and controllability, our understanding of the physics of monitored quantum systems has considerably deepened over the past decades. In this article, we provide an introductory theoretical review on the basic formalisms governing open quantum dynamics under measurement, along with recent developments in their spectral and typical aspects. After reviewing quantum measurement theory, we introduce the concept of quantum trajectories, which are the conditional dynamics of monitored states shaped by a set of measurement outcomes. We then discuss the spectral properties of the dynamical map describing the evolution averaged over measurement outcomes. As has recently been recognized, these spectral features are intimately connected to whether quantum trajectories exhibit typical behaviors, such as ergodicity and purification. Moreover, we introduce Lyapunov exponents of typical quantum trajectories and discuss how these quantities serve as indicators of measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored quantum many-body systems.