Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics & Optics Sciences

The Connection between The Theory of Time and the Causal Mechanics of N.A. Kozyrev

Vladimir Alekseevich Romanenko

Published Dec 2, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper presents mathematical proofs of N.A. Kozyrev's postulates, confirming his theory of time. To visualize the proofs, vector diagrams constructed based on the dual equations derived by the author are used. In addition to Kozyrev's time flow, the author uses another time flow, which he obtained theoretically. Furthermore, the paper utilizes the author's previous research results. Their application made the model of the cause-effect interaction process simple and understandable. An example implementing the cause-effect model is provided at the end of the article.

DOI
10.47363/jpsos/2025(7)345

Related papers

The Mathematical Formula Of The Causal Relationship k

Ilija Barukčić

Abstract—The deterministic relationship between cause and effect is deeply connected with our understanding of the physical sciences and their explanatory ambitions. Though progress is being made, the lack of theoretical predictions and experiments in quantum gravity makes it difficult to use empirical evidence to justify a theory of causality at quantum level in normal circumstances, i. e. by predicting the value of a well-confirmed experimental result. For a variety of reasons, the problem of the deterministic relationship between cause and effect is related to basic problems of physics as such. Despite the common belief, it is a remarkable fact that a theory of causality should be consistent with a theory of everything and is because of this linked to problems of a theory of everything. Thus far, solving the problem of causality will help us to solve the problems of the theory of everything (at quantum level).

•Jun 24, 2015•1 citation

The Mathematical Formula of the Causal Relationship k

Horandstrasse, DE-26441 Jever, Germany, Ilija Barukčić

The deterministic relationship between cause and effect is deeply connected with our understanding of the physical sciences and their explanatory ambitions.Though progress is being made, the lack of theoretical predictions and experiments in quantum gravity makes it difficult to use empirical evidence to justify a theory of causality at quantum level in normal circumstances, i. e. by predicting the value of a well-confirmed experimental result.For a variety of reasons, the problem of the deterministic relationship between cause and effect is related to basic problems of physics as such.Despite the common belief, it is a remarkable fact that a theory of causality should be consistent with a theory of everything and is because of this linked to problems of a theory of everything.Thus far, solving the problem of causality will help us to solve the problems of the theory of everything (at quantum level).

International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics•Jan 1, 2016•35 citations

The Mathematical Justification of a Possible Wave Nature of the Time Flow of Kozyrev

Andrew E. Chubykalo, Augusto Espinoza

The Mathematical Justification of a Possible Wave Nature of the Time Flow of Kozyrev A. Chubykalo, A. Espinoza Abstract In this brief note we do not prove or disprove the existence of the so-called time flow in the conception of time offered by N.A. Kozyrev, here we merely give the mathematical justification of the presumable wave nature Kosyrev’s time flow in the case of the physical existence of the mentioned flow. Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijpa.v2n3-4a2

International Journal of Physics and Astronomy•Jan 1, 2014•4 citations

Dual-Time Supercausality.

Chris C. King

This article explores models of causality of the physical universe which extend beyond the usual quantum and classical descriptions. To facilitate discussion of this topic, a brief review of relevant areas of modern physics is included. Although mathematical logic is not directed in time, the causal description of the physical universe is classically performed in terms of temporal determinism, an initial-value problem in which subsequent states are determined through the action of differential equations, thus avoiding the paradox of effects preceding their causes. Quantum mechanics has reduced this description to the status of a stochastic-causal theory, in which individual future states of a system are not predictable because the probability interpretation of the wave function prevents a complete knowledge of a single reduction of the wave packet. The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics provides a basis for examining the workings of stochastic causality in terms of time-symmetri c advanced and retarded waves. Cosmic symmetry-breaking provides a contrasting description in which time-directed phenomena derive their explanation. Dual-time supercausality replaces the stochastic model with one in which two complementary causal processes, symmetric- time and directed-time are operating. The mode of interaction of these avoids temporal paradox in the time- directed description, and also explains why quantum mechanics provides an incomplete stochastic model. An important role for supercausal processes in the structural evolution of the universe is proposed, including the emergence of biosystems, biological evolution, and consciousness. 1 : CAUSALITIES AND SUPERCAUSALITIES Since the development of calculus and the Newtonian model of the universe, the evolution of dynamical events has been described through the directional application of time as a parameter. The evolution of a classical system can in principle be causally described in terms of the initial conditions and the differential equations governing its action. In the classical Laplacian universe, the initial conditions and the dynamical equations taken together completely specify the ongoing state at subsequent times. We will refer to this model as temporal determinism. The classical Hamiltonian and Lagrangian dynamical equations are both expressed as differential equations expressing generalized coordinates in terms of increasing time, where = T - V and in the case of a potential, = T + V, giving the total ( T kinetic & V potential ) energy :

Physics Essays•Jun 1, 1989•18 citations

Causal Theories

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Giulio Chiribella, Paolo Perinotti

In this chapter we introduce the postulate of causality, and derive the mathematical structure of a causal OPT. We show how the present definition of causality is equivalent to the Einsteinian one, and argue that it is the only possible notion once it is stripped from its spurious deterministic connotation. In addition, the notion of causality used here is compliant with the historical philosophical concept since David Hume, and with the idea used in common reasoning, inference, and modeling in human sciences. In brief, the present notion of causality can be stated as the requirement of no signaling from the future . This is also the only requisite for an OPT in order to satisfy the principle of no signaling without interaction . In mathematical terms in an OPT the causality postulate is equivalent to the uniqueness of the deterministic effect, which in turn is equivalent to the ability to normalize states. The notion of causality is so naturally embedded in our understanding of reality that it often remains unconsciously implicit in foundational research, even in recent axiomatizations. Causality: From Cinderella to Principle Causality has been the object of a very extensive literature encompassing hundreds of books and technical articles in a wide spectrum of disciplines, ranging from pure philosophy to economics, law, natural sciences, and obviously, physics. Also due to its involvement in such heterogeneous blend of disciplines, causality has long been a vexed notion. Perhaps the most natural connection between concepts of causality in different branches of knowledge is the one at the borderline between physics and philosophy, since the early work of Aristotle, up to the cornerstone of Renée Descartes, who broke the ground for the modern view of David Hume and Immanuel Kant, through to contemporary works on physical causation. Causality has always remained in the realm of philosophy, staying only in the background of physics, without the status of a “law” or the rank of a “principle.” Most of the time causality creeps into physical theories in the form of ad hoc assumptions based on empirical evidences, as when we discard advanced potentials in electrodynamics or when we motivate the Kramers–Kronig relations. In other cases, causality is embodied in the “interpretation” of the theory, as for the Special Relativity of Einstein.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 2, 2016•0 citations

Governing Dynamics from cause and effect: -A novel formulation for causality with applications in Quantum Gravity and Economic Theory

Jussi Lindgren

This paper defines an equation for causality. This equation is then combined with the postulates of quantum mechanics and mass-energy equivalence to produce a quantum mechanical telegrapher's equation and to reproduce the Schrodinger and Klein-Gordon equations. The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and dynamic general equilibrium in economics (with an interpretation of a Nash equilibrium) are obtained when the equation of causality refers to itself, i.e. when the cause is its own effect. As it is shown that the Klein-Gordon equation is obtained by Wick rotating the cause vector with de Broglie angular frequency, this paper postulates an equation for Quantum Gravity, which relates the Navier-Stokes equations to the Einstein Field Equations of General Relativity.

arXiv:0708.2674•Aug 20, 2007•0 citations
This paper presents mathematical proofs of N.A. Kozyrev's postulates, confirming his theory of time. To visualize the proofs, vector diagrams constructed based on the dual equations derived by the author are used. In addition to Kozyrev's time flow, the author uses another time flow, which he obtained theoretically. Furthermore, the paper utilizes the author's previous research results. Their application made the model of the cause-effect interaction process simple and understandable. An example implementing the cause-effect model is provided at the end of the article.
Abstract—The deterministic relationship between cause and effect is deeply connected with our understanding of the physical sciences and their explanatory ambitions. Though progress is being made, the lack of theoretical predictions and experiments in quantum gravity makes it difficult to use empirical evidence to justify a theory of causality at quantum level in normal circumstances, i. e. by predicting the value of a well-confirmed experimental result. For a variety of reasons, the problem of the deterministic relationship between cause and effect is related to basic problems of physics as such. Despite the common belief, it is a remarkable fact that a theory of causality should be consistent with a theory of everything and is because of this linked to problems of a theory of everything. Thus far, solving the problem of causality will help us to solve the problems of the theory of everything (at quantum level).
The deterministic relationship between cause and effect is deeply connected with our understanding of the physical sciences and their explanatory ambitions.Though progress is being made, the lack of theoretical predictions and experiments in quantum gravity makes it difficult to use empirical evidence to justify a theory of causality at quantum level in normal circumstances, i. e. by predicting the value of a well-confirmed experimental result.For a variety of reasons, the problem of the deterministic relationship between cause and effect is related to basic problems of physics as such.Despite the common belief, it is a remarkable fact that a theory of causality should be consistent with a theory of everything and is because of this linked to problems of a theory of everything.Thus far, solving the problem of causality will help us to solve the problems of the theory of everything (at quantum level).
This article explores models of causality of the physical universe which extend beyond the usual quantum and classical descriptions. To facilitate discussion of this topic, a brief review of relevant areas of modern physics is included. Although mathematical logic is not directed in time, the causal description of the physical universe is classically performed in terms of temporal determinism, an initial-value problem in which subsequent states are determined through the action of differential equations, thus avoiding the paradox of effects preceding their causes. Quantum mechanics has reduced this description to the status of a stochastic-causal theory, in which individual future states of a system are not predictable because the probability interpretation of the wave function prevents a complete knowledge of a single reduction of the wave packet. The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics provides a basis for examining the workings of stochastic causality in terms of time-symmetri c advanced and retarded waves. Cosmic symmetry-breaking provides a contrasting description in which time-directed phenomena derive their explanation. Dual-time supercausality replaces the stochastic model with one in which two complementary causal processes, symmetric- time and directed-time are operating. The mode of interaction of these avoids temporal paradox in the time- directed description, and also explains why quantum mechanics provides an incomplete stochastic model. An important role for supercausal processes in the structural evolution of the universe is proposed, including the emergence of biosystems, biological evolution, and consciousness. 1 : CAUSALITIES AND SUPERCAUSALITIES Since the development of calculus and the Newtonian model of the universe, the evolution of dynamical events has been described through the directional application of time as a parameter. The evolution of a classical system can in principle be causally described in terms of the initial conditions and the differential equations governing its action. In the classical Laplacian universe, the initial conditions and the dynamical equations taken together completely specify the ongoing state at subsequent times. We will refer to this model as temporal determinism. The classical Hamiltonian and Lagrangian dynamical equations are both expressed as differential equations expressing generalized coordinates in terms of increasing time, where = T - V and in the case of a potential, = T + V, giving the total ( T kinetic & V potential ) energy :
In this chapter we introduce the postulate of causality, and derive the mathematical structure of a causal OPT. We show how the present definition of causality is equivalent to the Einsteinian one, and argue that it is the only possible notion once it is stripped from its spurious deterministic connotation. In addition, the notion of causality used here is compliant with the historical philosophical concept since David Hume, and with the idea used in common reasoning, inference, and modeling in human sciences. In brief, the present notion of causality can be stated as the requirement of no signaling from the future . This is also the only requisite for an OPT in order to satisfy the principle of no signaling without interaction . In mathematical terms in an OPT the causality postulate is equivalent to the uniqueness of the deterministic effect, which in turn is equivalent to the ability to normalize states. The notion of causality is so naturally embedded in our understanding of reality that it often remains unconsciously implicit in foundational research, even in recent axiomatizations. Causality: From Cinderella to Principle Causality has been the object of a very extensive literature encompassing hundreds of books and technical articles in a wide spectrum of disciplines, ranging from pure philosophy to economics, law, natural sciences, and obviously, physics. Also due to its involvement in such heterogeneous blend of disciplines, causality has long been a vexed notion. Perhaps the most natural connection between concepts of causality in different branches of knowledge is the one at the borderline between physics and philosophy, since the early work of Aristotle, up to the cornerstone of Renée Descartes, who broke the ground for the modern view of David Hume and Immanuel Kant, through to contemporary works on physical causation. Causality has always remained in the realm of philosophy, staying only in the background of physics, without the status of a “law” or the rank of a “principle.” Most of the time causality creeps into physical theories in the form of ad hoc assumptions based on empirical evidences, as when we discard advanced potentials in electrodynamics or when we motivate the Kramers–Kronig relations. In other cases, causality is embodied in the “interpretation” of the theory, as for the Special Relativity of Einstein.
This paper defines an equation for causality. This equation is then combined with the postulates of quantum mechanics and mass-energy equivalence to produce a quantum mechanical telegrapher's equation and to reproduce the Schrodinger and Klein-Gordon equations. The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and dynamic general equilibrium in economics (with an interpretation of a Nash equilibrium) are obtained when the equation of causality refers to itself, i.e. when the cause is its own effect. As it is shown that the Klein-Gordon equation is obtained by Wick rotating the cause vector with de Broglie angular frequency, this paper postulates an equation for Quantum Gravity, which relates the Navier-Stokes equations to the Einstein Field Equations of General Relativity.