As quantum software engineering (QSE) matures, practitioners are adopting classical software engineering practices. This paper proposes a quantum experiment tracking infrastructure that aids quantum researchers in making informed decisions while developing quantum software incrementally and iteratively. By leveraging tools and best practices from classical machine learning communities, we provide a mature environment for quantum software practitioners to enhance their practices. Our approach involves collecting a comprehensive quantum provenance dataset from each experiment execution for analysis and decision-making. To validate our approach, we developed an experimental environment where a program was iteratively developed on quantum simulators and an IQM computer, and we demonstrate how the development workflow backed by the tracking infrastructure meets expectations for quantum experiment reporting.
As quantum software engineering (QSE) matures, practitioners are adopting classical software engineering practices. This paper proposes a quantum experiment tracking infrastructure that aids quantum researchers in making informed decisions while developing quantum software incrementally and iteratively. By leveraging tools and best practices from classical machine learning communities, we provide a mature environment for quantum software practitioners to enhance their practices. Our approach involves collecting a comprehensive quantum provenance dataset from each experiment execution for analysis and decision-making. To validate our approach, we developed an experimental environment where a program was iteratively developed on quantum simulators and an IQM computer, and we demonstrate how the development workflow backed by the tracking infrastructure meets expectations for quantum experiment reporting.
As quantum computing advances from theoretical promise to experimental reality, the need for rigorous experiment tracking becomes critical. Drawing inspiration from best practices in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), we argue that reproducibility, scalability, and collaboration in quantum research can benefit significantly from structured tracking workflows. This paper explores the application of MLflow in quantum research, illustrating how it enables better development practices, experiment reproducibility, decision making, and cross-domain integration in an increasingly hybrid classical-quantum landscape.
As quantum computing advances from theoretical promise to experimental reality, the need for rigorous experiment tracking becomes critical. Drawing inspiration from best practices in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), we argue that reproducibility, scalability, and collaboration in quantum research can benefit significantly from structured tracking workflows. This paper explores the application of MLflow in quantum research, illustrating how it enables better development practices, experiment reproducibility, decision making, and cross-domain integration in an increasingly hybrid classical-quantum landscape.
Quantum computers are more widely available than ever, making the field more accessible and widespread. Practitioners are coming from a wide range of domains, conducting experiments and research using quantum computing approaches across a variety of problems. The current literature suggests that developers follow certain methodologies in quantum software development, often with a matching set of tools provided. Yet with the novel paradigm, there are areas that remain unaddressed in practices and tools. In this article, we go into the details of experiment tracking in quantum software development. We explain the basic concept of experiment tracking and detail how, in essence, quantum computing sets demands on tracking practices. Given the experimental state of hardware and the constantly evolving software, quantum execution must be monitored, marginal gains aggregated for the best outcome, and error sources detected. In our case study, quantum reservoir computing for chaotic time series data prediction with error mitigation, we present a detailed quantum software development process and describe how experiments can be tracked throughout development. We then generalize this knowledge into the broader quantum development process.
Quantum computing promises transformative computational capabilities; however, the absence of structured and standardized software engineering significantly limits its practical scalability. Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) remains fragmented, tool-centric, and largely experimental. This paper proposes a structured Quantum Software Engineering Lifecycle Framework that systematically integrates requirements engineering, hybrid design, quantum development, verification, deployment, and governance. To validate the proposed lifecycle, a two-stage evaluation was conducted. First, a Delphi-based expert validation involving 15 domain experts assessed clarity, feasibility, scalability, and hybrid applicability. Second, a simulation-based comparative analysis using Qiskit and PennyLane evaluated the lifecycle against ad-hoc development workflows across variational and search-based quantum algorithms. Results demonstrate a 24% reduction in development time, 15–18% improvement in execution fidelity, and significant gains in modularity, reusability, and tool interoperability. These findings confirm that adopting a structured lifecycle enables more reliable, scalable, and sustainable quantum software development, positioning QSE as a mature engineering discipline rather than purely experimental practice.
This paper introduces a vision for Quantum Software Development lifecycle, proposing a hybrid full-stack iterative model that integrates quantum and classical computing. Addressing the current challenges in Quantum Computing (QC) such as the need for integrating diverse programming languages and managing the complexities of quantum-classical systems, this model is rooted in the principles of DevOps and continuous software engineering. It presents a comprehensive lifecycle for quantum software development, encompassing quantum-agnostic coding, testing, deployment, cloud computing services, orchestration, translation, execution, and interpretation phases. Each phase is designed to accommodate the unique demands of QC, enabling traditional software developers to engage with QC environments without needing in-depth QC expertise. The paper presents a detailed implementation roadmap, utilizing a range of existing tools and frameworks, thereby making quantum software development more accessible and efficient. The proposed model not only addresses current challenges in quantum software development but also makes a substantial contribution to the field of Quantum Software Engineering (QSE). By proposing a structured and accessible model, it sets the stage for further advancements and research in QSE, enhancing its practicality and relevance in a wide range of applications.
Quantum computing is rapidly advancing, but quantum software development faces significant challenges, including a steep learning curve, high hardware error rates, and a lack of mature engineering practices. This study conducts a large-scale mining analysis of over 21,000 GitHub repositories, containing 1.2 million commits from more than 10,000 developers, to examine the evolution and maintenance of quantum software. We analyze repository growth, programming language and framework adoption, and contributor trends, revealing a 200 % increase in repositories and a 150 % rise in contributors since 2017. Additionally, we investigate software development and maintenance practices, showing that perfective commits dominate (51.76 %), while the low occurrence of corrective commits (18.54%) indicates potential gaps in bug resolution. Furthermore, 34% of reported issues are quantum-specific, highlighting the need for specialized debugging tools beyond conventional software engineering approaches. This study provides empirical insights into the software engineering challenges of quantum computing, offering recommendations to improve development workflows, tooling, and documentation. We are also open-sourcing our dataset to support further analysis by the community and to guide future research and tool development for quantum computing. The dataset is available at: https://github.com/kriss-u/QRepoAnalysis-Paper.