Using the concept of quantum wave probability, combined with the identity principle, we can derive the Boltzmann distribution, Fermi distribution, and Bose distribution. Different distributions correspond to different conditions. The Boltzmann condition corresponds to the Boltzmann distribution. The Fermi condition corresponds to the Fermi distribution. The Bose condition corresponds to the Bose distribution. This demonstrates that the foundation of these three statistical distributions is quantum wave probability, all originating from quantum mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is also an independent quantum distribution and is not simply a sparse limit of the Fermi or Bose distributions. The essence of the Boltzmann distribution is a uniform distribution. The Fermi and Bose distributions are deviations from the uniform distribution. Particles that follow the Boltzmann distribution can be called Boltzmannons. Boltzmann entropy based on the quantum wave probability can resolve the Gibbs paradox. We need to rethink the fundamentals of statistical mechanics.
Using the concept of quantum wave probability, combined with the identity principle, we can derive the Boltzmann distribution, Fermi distribution, and Bose distribution. Different distributions correspond to different conditions. The Boltzmann condition corresponds to the Boltzmann distribution. The Fermi condition corresponds to the Fermi distribution. The Bose condition corresponds to the Bose distribution. This demonstrates that the foundation of these three statistical distributions is quantum wave probability, all originating from quantum mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is also an independent quantum distribution and is not simply a sparse limit of the Fermi or Bose distributions. The essence of the Boltzmann distribution is a uniform distribution. The Fermi and Bose distributions are deviations from the uniform distribution. Particles that follow the Boltzmann distribution can be called Boltzmannons. Boltzmann entropy based on the quantum wave probability can resolve the Gibbs paradox. We need to rethink the fundamentals of statistical mechanics.
Using the concept of quantum wave probability, combined with the identity principle, we can derive the Boltzmann distribution, Fermi distribution, and Bose distribution. Different distributions correspond to different conditions. The Boltzmann condition corresponds to the Boltzmann distribution. The Fermi condition corresponds to the Fermi distribution. The Bose condition corresponds to the Bose distribution. This demonstrates that the foundation of these three statistical distributions is quantum wave probability, all originating from quantum mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is also an independent quantum distribution and is not simply a sparse limit of the Fermi or Bose distributions. The essence of the Boltzmann distribution is a uniform distribution. The Fermi and Bose distributions are deviations from the uniform distribution. Boltzmann entropy based on the quantum wave probability can resolve the Gibbs paradox. Using this new approach, we can also derive the results of eigenstate thermalization. The equilibrium state is the state in which all eigenstates have the same temperatures. We need to rethink the fundamentals of statistical mechanics.
Using the concept of quantum wave probability, combined with the identity principle, we can derive the Boltzmann distribution, Fermi distribution, and Bose distribution. Different distributions correspond to different conditions. The Boltzmann condition corresponds to the Boltzmann distribution. The Fermi condition corresponds to the Fermi distribution. The Bose condition corresponds to the Bose distribution. This demonstrates that the foundation of these three statistical distributions is quantum wave probability, all originating from quantum mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is also an independent quantum distribution and is not simply a sparse limit of the Fermi or Bose distributions. The essence of the Boltzmann distribution is a uniform distribution. The Fermi and Bose distributions are deviations from the uniform distribution. Boltzmann entropy based on the quantum wave probability can resolve the Gibbs paradox. Using this new approach, we can also derive the results of eigenstate thermalization. The equilibrium state is the state in which all eigenstates have the same temperature. We need to rethink the fundamentals of statistical mechanics.
The statistical problem of the distribution of
s quanta of equal energy
ε0 and total energy
E among
N distinguishable particles is resolved using the conventional theory based on Boltzmann's principle of equal probabilities of configurations of particles distributed among energy levels and the concept of average state. In particular, the probability that a particle is in the \k{appa}-th energy level i.e. contains \k{appa} quanta, is given by
p(κ)=(N−1N+s−1)(N−2N+s−κ−2);κ=0,1,2,⋯,s In this context, the special case (
N=4,
s=4) presented indicates that the alternative concept of most probable state is not valid for finite values of
s and
N. In the present article we derive alternatively
p(κ) by distributing
s quanta over
N particles and by introducing a new principle of equal probability of quantum states, where the quanta are indistinguishable in agreement with the Bose statistics. Therefore, the analysis of the two approaches presented in this paper highlights the equivalence of quantum theory with classical statistical mechanics for the present system. At the limit $ε_{o} \rightarrow 0 $; $s \rightarrow \infty $;
sεo=E∼ fixed, where the energy of the particles becomes continuous,
p(κ) transforms to the Boltzmann law
P(ε)=⟨ε⟩1e−⟨ε⟩ε;0≤ε<+∞ where
⟨ε⟩=E/N. Hence, the classical principle of equal a priori probabilities for the energy of the particles leading to the above law, is justified here by quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics/thermodynamics are both statistical theories, but have key differences. We argue that one such key difference is nonlocality in the quantum world i.e a wavelength proportional to 1/p and a probability of exp(ipx) associated with p versus locality in the classical case. Quantum nonlocality tends to lead to spatial densities with humps even for a particle with a fixed energy in an infinite potential box. Recently it has been suggested in (1) that one may think of a quantum particle in a box with infinite walls in terms of thermodynamical properties e.g. pressure which is taken to be constant throughout the box. From this assumption, one finds that quantum entropy is ln[ Average(nxnx + nyny+nznz)]. For a single quantum state, this seems to imply that entropy is ln[nxnx+nyny+nznz] ((1a)). In a previous note (2), we suggested that quantum entropy for a wavefunction (say an eigenstate) is Integral dx W*(x)W(x) ln[W*W] + Integral dp a*(p)a(p) ln[a*(p)a(p)] ((1b)). We found this is independent of L for a particle in a box with infinite walls so that displacing the wall adiabatically should mean that dS/dL = 0 which it does as L cancels from ((1)). We argue in this note that quantum pressure should be linked to the density humps for a sin(pave x)sin(pave x) wavefunction even though pave is constant at all x points. Thus it seems that one would not consider a constant pressure for sin(pave x)=wavefunction. Furthermore ((1b)) does not yield the same entropy as ((1a)). It is noted in (1) that ((1a)) is an exact expression for entropy and that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution entropy approximates it. In this note, we argue that a time reversal balanced scattering reaction leads to the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions and these both lead to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution under certain conditions. (The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution may also be obtained from time reversal balanced scattering with looser restrictions.)