Schrödinger's Dream: A New Wave-Based Approach to Unified Field Theory

Tam Hunt

Published Sep 30, 2025• 0 citations

Abstract

Almost 100 years ago, Erwin Schrödinger’s pioneering contributions provided the foundation for quantum mechanics, yet his deeper ontological vision of a purely wave-based reality was largely sidelined by the rise of the Copenhagen interpretation and its rejection of realism. This paper revisits and extends Schrödinger's wave-based ontology, exploring its potential evolution in light of contemporary physics challenges. The Quantum Ocean Theory (QOT) theory developed here reconceptualizes the quantum ocean as a dynamic, oscillatory field from which all physical phenomena emerge. Through a single wave equation, QOT describes particles as localized standing waves and forces as traveling waves of different frequencies of the underlying medium, with physical constants like the speed of light emerging naturally from the vacuum's underlying properties. All forces emerge organically from the wave equation. Drawing from Schrödinger's philosophical commitments and scientific insights, alongside complementary ideas from Einstein, Whitehead, Bohm, and Bell, we argue that QOT provides both a unified mathematical framework and coherent ontological foundation for physics. The framework offers novel solutions to persistent challenges in modern physics, including the Hubble tension, quantum measurement problem, and the quest for quantum gravity. It makes specific, testable predictions regarding galactic synchrony, early galaxy formation, and quantum coherence phenomena. Beyond its empirical implications, QOT represents a return to the kind of realist, deterministic physics that Einstein and Schrödinger advocated, while incorporating modern insights about non-locality and quantum behavior.

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202509.2529.v1

Related papers

An Introduction to the Foundations and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Theodore McKeever, Ahsan Nazir

This article surveys a selection of key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's theorem, and Hardy's paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie-Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how several of the most prominent interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09818Mar 11, 20260 citations

An introduction to the foundations and interpretations of quantum mechanics

Theodore McKeever, Ahsan Nazir

This article surveys a selection of key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument, Bell’s theorem, and Hardy’s paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie–Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how several of the most prominent interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.

Canadian Journal of PhysicsJan 1, 20260 citations

Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory

Guillermo C. Barraza

This article is the second part of a three-paper sequence developing Ontological Field Theory (OFT) as a unified framework grounding quantum mechanics in foundational ontological principles. The trilogy is structured as follows: Part I — Conceptual Necessity:Why Quantum Mechanics Is Inevitable: Ontological Continuity and the Necessity of Quantum Dynamics establishes that quantum mechanics follows necessarily from minimal requirements on coherent being, independently of specific physical postulates. Part II — Technical Realization:Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Ontological Field Theory provides the explicit field-theoretic derivation showing how the Schrödinger equation emerges as the non-relativistic limit of a covariant ontological field. Part III — Critical Context:Why Classical Physics Is an Approximation: Decoherence, Coarse-Graining, and the Limits of Determinism explains why classical determinism and trajectories arise only as emergent, approximate descriptions of fundamentally quantum and relational dynamics. Each article is logically self-contained, but the full argument is distributed across the three contributions. The conceptual analysis motivates the mathematics; the mathematics grounds the physics; and the critical examination situates classical intuition as a limiting case rather than a foundation. The papers are intended to be read as a coherent whole. We argue that quantum mechanics is not an arbitrary empirical framework but an inevitable consequence of minimal ontological requirements. Assuming only that being must exist necessarily, remain consistent, be relational, and admit self-reference, we show that classical deterministic physics is structurally insufficient. Quantum dynamics emerges as the unique low-energy realization of coherent ontological continuity. This work complements explicit field-theoretic derivations by clarifying why quantum mechanics could not have been otherwise.

Dec 25, 20250 citations

Light, Correlation, and the Emergence of Reality. An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Fields

Manfred Albert Hörz

This article presents an ontological interpretation of quantum fields, arguing that light and correlation form the foundational processes through which physical reality emerges. By shifting the focus from particle‑based metaphysics to relational and field‑based structures, the work explores how coherence, interaction, and the dynamics of correlation generate the phenomena we describe as ‘reality’. The article integrates conceptual analysis with insights from quantum field theory to propose a unified ontological framework.

Feb 11, 20260 citations

A Descriptive Study of Quantum Mechanics

Abdulaziz Selham

Student research work in high school on the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.Abstract:Quantum physics represents one of the most profound conceptual revolutions in modern science,redefining the foundations of matter, energy, and spacetime. This paper presents a structuredtheoretical examination of the development and implications of quantum mechanics, beginningwith the resolution of the ultraviolet catastrophe through energy quantization and extending tothe emergence of wave–particle duality, superposition, and intrinsic indeterminacy. By tracingthe contributions of Planck, Einstein, de Broglie, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Dirac, the workanalyzes the transition from classical determinism to probabilistic wave mechanics and thesubsequent formulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and quantum field theory (QFT).Particular attention is given to the conceptual shift from particles as localized objects toexcitations of underlying fields, providing a framework for understanding particle interactions,conservation laws, and the Standard Model of particle physics. The tension between quantummechanics and general relativity is examined through the unresolved problem of quantumgravity, highlighting the theoretical limitations that persist at singularities and Planck-scaleregimes. Rather than treating classical and quantum theories as irreconcilable domains, this studyconsiders their structural interplay and philosophical implications, emphasizing the need for aunified framework that coherently incorporates spacetime and quantization. The analysisprovides a qualitative synthesis intended to support future quantitative investigations intofundamental physics and the continued development of quantum technologies.

Jul 15, 20260 citations

Quantum Mechanics as Substrate Vibration

Dustin Lee

Standard quantum mechanics works. Its predictions are accurate to more decimal places than almost any other physical theory, and the mathematical formalism, Hilbert spaces, operators, Born rule, Schrödinger evolution, is clean and internally consistent. The problem is not the math. The problem is that the math comes with an ontological silence so loud it has generated a century of philosophical argument and left generations of students convinced that quantum mechanics is inherently mysterious. It is not.This paper proposes a unified interpretive framework in which the wavefunction ψ(x,t) is a literal oscillation pattern in a physical substrate, a continuous, structured medium that underlies all observable phenomena. In this framework: superposition is a physical mixture of mode shapes; measurement is mode locking; quantization is resonant mode selection; entanglement is a shared mode spanning multiple spatial regions; uncertainty is a Fourier-intrinsic property of any localized wave; particles are stable topological knot solutions; and tunneling is evanescent mode extension through a tension barrier.We do not throw out the math. We give it a physical home. Sections 2–10 develop each concept systematically with worked examples and comparisons to standard formalism. Section 11 assembles the unified picture. Section 12 identifies testable predictions. Section 13 concludes.

Sep 16, 20260 citations