Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

UNITEXT for physics

Hilbert Space Formulation of Quantum Physics

Sergio Cecotti

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-98824-0_2

Related papers

The Hilbert Space Formulation of Quantum Physics

Peter Mittelstaedt

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

States in the Hilbert space formulation and in the phase space formulation of quantum mechanics

Jaromir Tosiek, P. Brzykcy

arXiv:1210.7672•Annals of Physics•May 1, 2012•6 citations

Phase Space Formulation of Quantum Mechanics as an Hidden Variables Theory

M. Revzen

An hidden variable (hv) theory is a theory that allows globally dispersion free ensembles. We demonstrate that the Phase Space formulation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is an hv theory with the position q, and momentum p as the hv. Comparing the Phase space and Hilbert space formulations of QM we identify the assumption that led von Neumann to the Hilbert space formulation of QM which, in turn, precludes global dispersion free ensembles within the theory. The assumption, dubbed I, is: "If a physical quantity $\mathbf{A}$ has an operator $\hat{A}$ then $f(\mathbf{A})$ has the operator $f(\hat{A})$". This assumption does not hold within the Phase Space formulation of QM. The hv interpretation of the Phase space formulation provides novel insight into the interrelation between dispersion and non commutativity of position and momentum (operators) within the Hilbert space formulation of QM and mitigates the criticism against von Neumann's no hidden variable theorem by, virtually, the consensus.

arXiv:2105.00242•May 1, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Hilbert Space

Eduard Prugovečki, Yuh‐Kang Pan

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1973•170 citations

Algebraic formulation of quantum theory, particle identity and entanglement

T. R. Govindarajan

Quantum theory as formulated in conventional framework using statevectors in Hilbert spaces misses the statistical nature of the underlying quantum physics. Formulation using operators [Formula: see text] algebra and density matrices appropriately captures this feature in addition leading to the correct formulation of particle identity. In this framework, Hilbert space is an emergent concept. Problems related to anomalies and quantum epistemology are discussed.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 3, 2016•0 citations

Physics of Unitary Transformations

K. Kong Wan

A physical theory often admits different mathematical descriptions. Classical mechanics has three familiar formulations: the traditional Newton’s formulation, the Lagrange’s and the Hamilton’s formulations. It is easy to see that these are physically equivalent. Quantum mechanics also admits many different formulations. This chapter discusses how different mathematical descriptions of a probability theory based on a Hilbert space can be physically equivalent. The prescription does not single out a unique Hilbert space nor a unique set of unit vectors and operators for the description of a given quantum system. This non-uniqueness does not matter since operators and unit vectors themselves are not physically measurable quantities. Two different mathematical descriptions of a quantum system are physically equivalent if the unit vectors and selfadjoint operators for the representation of states and observables in the two descriptions are related by a simultaneous unitary transformation.

•Jul 9, 2019•0 citations
An hidden variable (hv) theory is a theory that allows globally dispersion free ensembles. We demonstrate that the Phase Space formulation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is an hv theory with the position q, and momentum p as the hv. Comparing the Phase space and Hilbert space formulations of QM we identify the assumption that led von Neumann to the Hilbert space formulation of QM which, in turn, precludes global dispersion free ensembles within the theory. The assumption, dubbed I, is: "If a physical quantity A\mathbf{A}A has an operator A^\hat{A}A^ then f(A)f(\mathbf{A})f(A) has the operator f(A^)f(\hat{A})f(A^)". This assumption does not hold within the Phase Space formulation of QM. The hv interpretation of the Phase space formulation provides novel insight into the interrelation between dispersion and non commutativity of position and momentum (operators) within the Hilbert space formulation of QM and mitigates the criticism against von Neumann's no hidden variable theorem by, virtually, the consensus.
A physical theory often admits different mathematical descriptions. Classical mechanics has three familiar formulations: the traditional Newton’s formulation, the Lagrange’s and the Hamilton’s formulations. It is easy to see that these are physically equivalent. Quantum mechanics also admits many different formulations. This chapter discusses how different mathematical descriptions of a probability theory based on a Hilbert space can be physically equivalent. The prescription does not single out a unique Hilbert space nor a unique set of unit vectors and operators for the description of a given quantum system. This non-uniqueness does not matter since operators and unit vectors themselves are not physically measurable quantities. Two different mathematical descriptions of a quantum system are physically equivalent if the unit vectors and selfadjoint operators for the representation of states and observables in the two descriptions are related by a simultaneous unitary transformation.