Recent advances in quantum technology are impacting cryptographic primitives, affecting their security. In this paper, we will survey the impact of these technologies on blockchain and distributed ledgers, and analyze the post-quantum primitives available to restore their security guarantees, including the latest NIST PQC standards ML-DSA-44 and SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s. Our analysis reveals critical trade-offs in signature size, key storage, and consensus resilience, highlighting challenges for IoT and PoW blockchains. Results underscore the urgency of improvements to the standardized NIST PQC algorithms to mitigate quantum risks to the blockchain without compromising throughput and decentralization.
Recent advances in quantum technology are impacting cryptographic primitives, affecting their security. In this paper, we will survey the impact of these technologies on blockchain and distributed ledgers, and analyze the post-quantum primitives available to restore their security guarantees, including the latest NIST PQC standards ML-DSA-44 and SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s. Our analysis reveals critical trade-offs in signature size, key storage, and consensus resilience, highlighting challenges for IoT and PoW blockchains. Results underscore the urgency of improvements to the standardized NIST PQC algorithms to mitigate quantum risks to the blockchain without compromising throughput and decentralization.
The concept of blockchain technology has transformed the digital ecosystem to allow decentralized, transparent and immutable transactions in various sectors. Its security is closely dependent on classical cryptography like ECDSA and RSA to perform digital signatures and SHA-256 to achieve consensus, which are becoming more susceptible to quantum computing. The cryptographic principles underpinning blockchain could be compromised with the emergence of the quantum algorithms of Shor and Grover, endangering the integrity of transactions, authentication and consensus protocols. This paper discusses the implications that quantum computing could have on blockchain security, analyses vulnerabilities of current cryptographic primitives and assesses post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) protocols, including lattice-based protocols, hash-based protocols, and code-based protocols. To guarantee backwards compatibility, as well as a gradual upgrade process to quantum-resistant protocols, a hybrid migration approach that involves transactions with two signatures is suggested. Experimental analysis shows that PQC integration attains reasonable performance trade-offs, that preserve verification costs, block size growth, and throughput effects within feasible limits, and that zero-loss resilience is achieved during reorganization tests. The conclusion is that blockchains with PQC support can reach post-quantum levels of security without major operation interruption, and they provide a viable roadmap to moving towards distributed ledger systems that are future-ready.
The advent of quantum computing poses an existential threat to contemporary cryptographic standards, particularly those securing decentralized blockchain networks and cloud infrastructures.Classical public-key cryptosystems such as RSA, ECC, and DH, which rely on factorization and discrete logarithm problems, are rendered obsolete by Shor's algorithm, necessitating the transition toward post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) solutions.This study explores the integration of PQC algorithms, including lattice-based, hash-based, code-based, multivariate, and isogeny-based cryptographic mechanisms, within blockchain-ledger technologies and cloud architectures to ensure long-term security against quantum adversaries.A comparative analysis is conducted to evaluate computational efficiency, key size implications, communication overhead, and security resilience under quantum attack models.The research highlights the adaptation of PQC within blockchain consensus mechanisms, smart contract execution, and cryptographic primitives such as digital signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and secure multi-party computation (MPC).Additionally, it examines the impact of PQC on cloud security, addressing challenges in quantum-safe key exchange protocols, homomorphic encryption for secure computations, and cross-platform interoperability within hybrid quantum-classical cloud ecosystems.Real-world implementations and benchmarking data provide insights into the feasibility of large-scale adoption, shedding light on standardization efforts by NIST and industry consortia.The study concludes with future directions, emphasizing the need for efficient PQC algorithm optimization, lightweight cryptographic frameworks for IoT-driven blockchain applications, and scalable post-quantum identity management systems.By establishing quantum-resistant security frameworks, this research underscores the imperative need for early adoption to mitigate cryptographic vulnerabilities in the impending post-quantum era.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a critical threat to classical cryptographic schemes that secure modern distributed systems. As the deployment of distributed infrastructures—including blockchains, cloud-native applications, and edge networks—continues to grow, there is an urgent need to transition towards quantum-resistant security mechanisms. This paper provides a comprehensive examination of post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) algorithms and their applicability in distributed system architectures. We analyze the impact of quantum threats on key components of distributed systems such as communication protocols, identity management, data integrity, and consensus mechanisms. Furthermore, we evaluate current NIST-standardized PQC algorithms in terms of computational efficiency, scalability, and integration overhead within distributed environments. Challenges in key management, performance trade-offs, and implementation considerations are discussed. Finally, we propose best practices and future directions for secure, quantum-resilient distributed systems.
The blockchain technology has become a foundation of decentralized digital infrastructures, allowing secure, transparent, and tamper-resistant transactions in the finance and governance systems as well as supply chains ecosystems. But, existing blockchain systems are critically dependent on classical cryptography including RSA, ECDSA and hash-based primitives, which are becoming more susceptible to new entrant quantum computing. The quantum algorithm, especially Shor and Grover ones are a real challenge to the digital signatures, key exchange systems, and consensus integrity, which makes the sustainability of blockchain systems a serious concern in the long term.The practical approach of achieving quantum-resilient security without the use of quantum hardware-specific devices has seen considerable popularity in the form of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). Although the literature is mostly concentrated on algorithm design, there is little work on the topic of architectural implementation of PQC in the framework of decentralized blockchain solutions. This chapter offers a systematic discussion on quantum threats, review of the most prominent families of PQC algorithms and suggests suitable deployment-related options to deploy quantum-safe cryptographic tools to blockchain systems. The chapter identifies trade-offs between security, scalability, and performance through comparative assessment and real-world case analysis, including PQC testnets in development and enterprise blockchain projects. The most important contribution of this work is the ability to introduce the gap between theory of cryptographic developments and the aspects of practical blockchain implementation challenges, providing an overall framework of the transition towards quantum-resilient distributed systems. The results would assist the researchers, practitioners and policy makers, to develop a future-proof blockchain architecture that would be in place to withstand digital trust in post-quantum age.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a significant threat to classical cryptographic systems, particularly to widely used public-key schemes that rely on integer factorisation and the discrete logarithm problem. To ensure long-term data security against potential quantum adversaries, post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is currently standardised by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This paper goes beyond a theoretical overview by employing a systematic methodology to evaluate the empirical performance trade-offs of the newly standardised algorithms (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA) and key finalists (FN-DSA and HQC). Based on a comprehensive review of fragmented performance data, the work presents a comparative analysis focusing on data overhead, computational latency, and resource efficiency. As a primary contribution, this study proposes a deployment-oriented taxonomy that explicitly maps these PQC standards to optimal practical use cases, considering diverse constraints across Internet of Things, cloud environments, and blockchain networks. Furthermore, the paper addresses critical real-world deployment challenges, such as vulnerabilities to side-channel attacks and hardware-level implementation constraints. Ultimately, this work systematises current knowledge into a unified decision-making framework, guiding system architects in complex migration towards a quantum-resilient digital ecosystem.
Quantum computing presents a concrete threat to the cryptographic infrastructure of financial cryptocurrency systems. Commonly used public-key schemes, which are based on integer factorization and discrete logarithms, are vulnerable to quantum algorithms such as Shor’s. Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) provides distinct primitives that are conjectured to be resistant to known quantum computing attacks. Despite ongoing standardization efforts, these schemes remain largely untested in production-scale blockchain environments. Additionally, integrating PQC into distributed ledger systems introduces implementation challenges, including increased key and signature sizes, protocol compatibility issues, as well as potential disruptions to transaction verification, privacy guarantees, and governance mechanisms. This survey systematically examines the relationship between PQC and cryptocurrency systems, with a focus on algorithmic suitability, protocol-level impact, and deployment constraints.