Postselected communication over quantum channels

Kaiyuan Ji, Bartosz Regula, Mark M. Wilde

The single-letter characterization of the entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel is one of the seminal results of quantum information theory. In this paper, we consider a modified communication scenario in which the receiver is allowed an additional, “inconclusive” measurement outcome, and we employ an error metric given by the error probability in decoding the transmitted message conditioned on a conclusive measurement result. We call this setting postselected communication and the ensuing highest achievable rates the postselected capacities. Here, we provide a precise single-letter characterization of postselected capacities in the setting of entanglement assistance as well as the more general nonsignaling assistance, establishing that they are both equal to the channel’s projective mutual information — a variant of mutual information based on the Hilbert projective metric. We do so by establishing bounds on the one-shot postselected capacities, with a lower bound that makes use of a postselected teleportation-based protocol and an upper bound in terms of the postselected hypothesis testing relative entropy. As such, we obtain fundamental limits on a channel’s ability to communicate even when this strong resource of postselection is allowed, implying limitations on communication even when the receiver has access to postselected closed timelike curves.

John E. Kaufmann

Nicolas Gisin, Rob Thew

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, C. H. W. Barnes

A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.

Kaiyuan Ji, Seth Lloyd, Mark M. Wilde

We study the capacity of a quantum channel for retrocausal communication, where messages are transmitted backward in time, from a sender in the future to a receiver in the past, through a noisy postselected closed timelike curve mathematically represented by the channel. We completely characterize the one-shot retrocausal quantum and classical capacities, and we show that the corresponding asymptotic capacities are equal to the average and sum, respectively, of the channel's max-information and its regularized Doeblin information. This endows these information measures with a novel operational interpretation. Furthermore, our characterization can be generalized beyond quantum channels to all completely positive maps. This imposes information-theoretic limits on transmitting messages via postselected-teleportation-like mechanisms with arbitrary initial- and final-state boundary conditions, including those considered in various black-hole final-state models.