Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Qeios

The Measurement of Superpositions

Ken Krechmer

Published Aug 11, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Superposition is a quantum mechanical concept currently without a recognized equivalent in metrology measurements. Relative Measurement Theory (RMT) developed the significance of unit standards to metrology measurements. This paper introduces a limit into Cantor's Transfinite Set Theory (CTST) and develops how it relates to a unit standard. Recognizing CTST also describes a superposition, this paper develops how a transfinite superposition transforms into a normal distribution of metrology measurement results, when measurement results include calibration to a unit standard. Then a superposition has an equivalent set of metrology measurements.

DOI
10.32388/sh5d0z

Related papers

The Measurement of Superpositions

Ken Krechmer

Superposition is a quantum mechanical concept currently without a recognized equivalent in metrology measurements. Relative Measurement Theory (RMT) developed the significance of unit standards to metrology measurements. This paper introduces a limit into Cantor's Transfinite Set Theory (CTST) and develops how it relates to a unit standard. Recognizing CTST also describes a superposition, this paper develops how a transfinite superposition transforms into a normal distribution of metrology measurement results, when measurement results include calibration to a unit standard. Then a superposition has an equivalent set of metrology measurements.

Qeios•Feb 9, 2026•0 citations

Measurement Mechanics — Resolves QM Measurement Discrepancies

Ken Krechmer

Measurement Mechanics proposes a major modification to the current understanding of measurement. This modification adds a unit standard as axiomatic to measurement theory. Currently, measurement theory (representational) defines the result of a measurement comparison to be a ratio of quantities (numerical value and unit) where the unit terms are equal and cancel. When the units cancel such a ratio is local to one measurement system, i.e., probabilistic. Thus all QM measurement results, based upon current measurement theory are local, as J. S. Bell confirmed. However, the units of each metrology measurement result are correlated by calibration to an independent unit standard. Then measurement result comparisons are a ratio of quantities each correlated to a common unit standard, which allows independent measurement result comparisons that are non-local and deterministic. When unit standards are included in measurement theory all the apparent discrepancies between QM and classic measurements are resolved.

Qeios•Aug 5, 2024•0 citations

Relativity of quantum superpositions

Magdalena Zych, Fabio Costa, Timothy C. Ralph

In modern physics only relative quantities are considered to have physical significance. For example, position assigned to a system depends on the choice of coordinates, and only relative distances between different systems have physical relevance. On the other hand, in quantum theory the scenario where one system, A, is localised around certain position while another system B is in a spatial superposition is considered to be physically different from the scenario where A is in a superposition, while B is localised. Different physical effects are anticipated in the two scenarios especially when the two systems have widely different masses. Here we show that for any superposed amplitudes that are related by a symmetry transformation, the above scenarios are physically equivalent: probabilities for any measurement are the same whether we assign the superposition state to system A or to system B. More generally, linearity of quantum theory guarantees that if a theory is invariant under some symmetry transformations it is necessarily also invariant under their arbitrary `superpositions'. Thus the notion of a superposition turns out to be relative to the choice of coordinates, once it is realised that relations between coordinates do not need to be classical.

arXiv:1809.04999•Sep 13, 2018•14 citations

Calibration Completes the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality

Ken Krechmer

This paper is a response to the EPR paper titled: "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?", published in Physical Review in 1935. A quantum-mechanical (QM) measurement function describes a distribution of local results and each empirical measurement process produces one result as exact as allowed by a measuring instrument calibrated to a non-local unit standard. Repeating these empirical measurements produces a bell shaped distribution of measurement results. Each of these distributions can be compared to the other. To precisely compare a QM measurement function describing a distribution of eigenvectors to a distribution of repetitive empirical measurement results, it is necessary to determine, by calibration, the precision of the eigenvectors to the same standard as the empirical results, because each eigenvector evidences uncertainty relative to a standard. When the calibration process is recognized as formal as well as empirical, QM measurement function results and metrology measurement process results are unified.

•Jan 4, 2023•1 citation

Metrology for Quantum Hardware Standardization -- Charting a Pathway: A Strategic Review

Nobu-Hisa Kaneko

Advances in quantum mechanics have long underpinned metrology by enabling practical realizations of units through quantum effects. With the 2019 SI revision, traceability is anchored in defined fundamental constants, reinforcing the quantum-mechanical basis of modern standards. In parallel, quantum technologies are transitioning from laboratory science to engineering and early industrial deployment, bringing familiar pressures for integration, reliability, cost reduction, supply-chain formation, and standardization. The direction of benefit is thus reversing: metrology and precision measurement are becoming enabling infrastructure for the industrialization of quantum technologies. Against this backdrop, this paper surveys the metrology and precision-measurement capabilities required across representative quantum-computing modalities and identifies where electrical and related metrology can contribute to the development, characterization, and reliable operation of quantum hardware. We then discuss cross-cutting measurement needs and standardization opportunities that recur across platforms, and note how similar frameworks can extend to emerging quantum-sensing applications.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09098•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations

Qubits and their applications in metrology

Alexandr Chubanov

Now there is a great interest in the field of information technologies cause development a quantum computer that make direct use of quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform operations on data. Qubit - is a unit of quantum information—the quantum analogue of the classical bit. As a bit, a qubit admits two of its own state, but it can be in superposition. Following the development of a quantum computer will need to establish a standard unit of quantum information. The search for a candidate for the role of the qubit (and, stable) can give perspectives to the development of quantum metrology.

Ukrainian Metrological Journal•Apr 20, 2017•0 citations
Superposition is a quantum mechanical concept currently without a recognized equivalent in metrology measurements. Relative Measurement Theory (RMT) developed the significance of unit standards to metrology measurements. This paper introduces a limit into Cantor's Transfinite Set Theory (CTST) and develops how it relates to a unit standard. Recognizing CTST also describes a superposition, this paper develops how a transfinite superposition transforms into a normal distribution of metrology measurement results, when measurement results include calibration to a unit standard. Then a superposition has an equivalent set of metrology measurements.
Superposition is a quantum mechanical concept currently without a recognized equivalent in metrology measurements. Relative Measurement Theory (RMT) developed the significance of unit standards to metrology measurements. This paper introduces a limit into Cantor's Transfinite Set Theory (CTST) and develops how it relates to a unit standard. Recognizing CTST also describes a superposition, this paper develops how a transfinite superposition transforms into a normal distribution of metrology measurement results, when measurement results include calibration to a unit standard. Then a superposition has an equivalent set of metrology measurements.
Measurement Mechanics proposes a major modification to the current understanding of measurement. This modification adds a unit standard as axiomatic to measurement theory. Currently, measurement theory (representational) defines the result of a measurement comparison to be a ratio of quantities (numerical value and unit) where the unit terms are equal and cancel. When the units cancel such a ratio is local to one measurement system, i.e., probabilistic. Thus all QM measurement results, based upon current measurement theory are local, as J. S. Bell confirmed. However, the units of each metrology measurement result are correlated by calibration to an independent unit standard. Then measurement result comparisons are a ratio of quantities each correlated to a common unit standard, which allows independent measurement result comparisons that are non-local and deterministic. When unit standards are included in measurement theory all the apparent discrepancies between QM and classic measurements are resolved.
In modern physics only relative quantities are considered to have physical significance. For example, position assigned to a system depends on the choice of coordinates, and only relative distances between different systems have physical relevance. On the other hand, in quantum theory the scenario where one system, A, is localised around certain position while another system B is in a spatial superposition is considered to be physically different from the scenario where A is in a superposition, while B is localised. Different physical effects are anticipated in the two scenarios especially when the two systems have widely different masses. Here we show that for any superposed amplitudes that are related by a symmetry transformation, the above scenarios are physically equivalent: probabilities for any measurement are the same whether we assign the superposition state to system A or to system B. More generally, linearity of quantum theory guarantees that if a theory is invariant under some symmetry transformations it is necessarily also invariant under their arbitrary `superpositions'. Thus the notion of a superposition turns out to be relative to the choice of coordinates, once it is realised that relations between coordinates do not need to be classical.
This paper is a response to the EPR paper titled: "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?", published in Physical Review in 1935. A quantum-mechanical (QM) measurement function describes a distribution of local results and each empirical measurement process produces one result as exact as allowed by a measuring instrument calibrated to a non-local unit standard. Repeating these empirical measurements produces a bell shaped distribution of measurement results. Each of these distributions can be compared to the other. To precisely compare a QM measurement function describing a distribution of eigenvectors to a distribution of repetitive empirical measurement results, it is necessary to determine, by calibration, the precision of the eigenvectors to the same standard as the empirical results, because each eigenvector evidences uncertainty relative to a standard. When the calibration process is recognized as formal as well as empirical, QM measurement function results and metrology measurement process results are unified.
Advances in quantum mechanics have long underpinned metrology by enabling practical realizations of units through quantum effects. With the 2019 SI revision, traceability is anchored in defined fundamental constants, reinforcing the quantum-mechanical basis of modern standards. In parallel, quantum technologies are transitioning from laboratory science to engineering and early industrial deployment, bringing familiar pressures for integration, reliability, cost reduction, supply-chain formation, and standardization. The direction of benefit is thus reversing: metrology and precision measurement are becoming enabling infrastructure for the industrialization of quantum technologies. Against this backdrop, this paper surveys the metrology and precision-measurement capabilities required across representative quantum-computing modalities and identifies where electrical and related metrology can contribute to the development, characterization, and reliable operation of quantum hardware. We then discuss cross-cutting measurement needs and standardization opportunities that recur across platforms, and note how similar frameworks can extend to emerging quantum-sensing applications.
Now there is a great interest in the field of information technologies cause development a quantum computer that make direct use of quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform operations on data. Qubit - is a unit of quantum information—the quantum analogue of the classical bit. As a bit, a qubit admits two of its own state, but it can be in superposition. Following the development of a quantum computer will need to establish a standard unit of quantum information. The search for a candidate for the role of the qubit (and, stable) can give perspectives to the development of quantum metrology.