Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

A complementary perspective on quantum history

Alan Chodos

Published Aug 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/pt.yybg.wxkt

Related papers

COMPLEMENTARY HISTORIES AND COLLAPSE INTO THE PAST IN STANDARD QUANTUM MECHANICS

Yuri F. Orlov

It follows from the standard quantum formalism that in the time between any two noncommuting measurements there are two quantum states of the same system representing two complementary, forward and backward histories, histories that may be observed in two complementary experiments. It follows from this in turn that all interpretations of quantum mechanics based on the idea of a single state between measurements should be rejected. The non-existence of a faster-than-light nonlocality and of paradoxes in EPR-type experiments1 can be proved in the frame of the standard formalism when the reality of backward histories is taken into account.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Aug 10, 1999•0 citations

Quantum Histories and Their Implications

Adrian Kent

Springer eBooks•Jun 18, 2007•10 citations

The histories formalisms from the nomological perspective

Kefu Zhu

To revisit and analyze the histories formalism of quantum mechanics, this chapter will refer to the basic idea of the nomological interpretation of the quantum wave function as described in the previous chapter. The quantum wave functions can be interpreted as nomological and non-ontological elements of Bohmian mechanics. This inspires us that, in quantum histories formalism, the multiple conditions/criteria of determining the possible families of histories, whose validity can be examined by reasonable tests regarding the properties of subsystems, can be argued as lawful or nomological, while the quantum histories can be argued as the fundamental physical reality. We will specifically focus on this novel depiction of the formalism concerning quantum reality, which enables us to reconsider the numerous objections to the histories interpretation that were raised in previous chapters and re-examine/resolve from the nomological perspective the several aforementioned ontological and logical issues of quantum histories interpretation. However, there still remain challenging issues in the understanding of quantum histories.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 22, 2025•0 citations

The Historical Development of Quantum Theory

Jagdish Mehra, Helmut Rechenberg

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1982•623 citations

COMPLEMENTARITY AND THE ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF FOUR-LEVEL QUANTUM SYSTEMS

Dėnes Petz, András Szántó, Mihály Weiner

The history of complementary observables and mutual unbiased bases is shortly reviewed. A characterization is given in terms of conditional entropy of subalgebras due to Connes and Størmer. The extension of complementarity to noncommutative subalgebras is considered as well. Possible complementary decompositions of a four-level quantum system are described and a characterization of the Bell basis is obtained: The MASA generated by the Bell basis is complementary to both M2(ℂ) tensor factors.

Infinite Dimensional Analysis Quantum Probability and Related Topics•Mar 1, 2009•21 citations

The historical development of quantum theory

Hendrik B. G. Casimir

Contemporary Physics•Nov 1, 1983•168 citations
It follows from the standard quantum formalism that in the time between any two noncommuting measurements there are two quantum states of the same system representing two complementary, forward and backward histories, histories that may be observed in two complementary experiments. It follows from this in turn that all interpretations of quantum mechanics based on the idea of a single state between measurements should be rejected. The non-existence of a faster-than-light nonlocality and of paradoxes in EPR-type experiments1 can be proved in the frame of the standard formalism when the reality of backward histories is taken into account.
To revisit and analyze the histories formalism of quantum mechanics, this chapter will refer to the basic idea of the nomological interpretation of the quantum wave function as described in the previous chapter. The quantum wave functions can be interpreted as nomological and non-ontological elements of Bohmian mechanics. This inspires us that, in quantum histories formalism, the multiple conditions/criteria of determining the possible families of histories, whose validity can be examined by reasonable tests regarding the properties of subsystems, can be argued as lawful or nomological, while the quantum histories can be argued as the fundamental physical reality. We will specifically focus on this novel depiction of the formalism concerning quantum reality, which enables us to reconsider the numerous objections to the histories interpretation that were raised in previous chapters and re-examine/resolve from the nomological perspective the several aforementioned ontological and logical issues of quantum histories interpretation. However, there still remain challenging issues in the understanding of quantum histories.