Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in operations research

On the State of QUBO Solving

Thorsten Koch, Daniel Rehfeldt, Yuji Shinano

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-58405-3_46

Related papers

Solving QUBO problems with the methods of statistical physics and quantum mechanics

Máté Tibor Veszeli

model and the QUBO problem . . . . .

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Introduction to QUBO

Abraham P. Punnen

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•4 citations

Solving Max-3SAT Using QUBO Approximation

Sebastian Zielinski, Jonas Nüßlein, Michael Kölle +3 more

As contemporary quantum computers do not possess error correction, any calculation performed by these devices can be considered an involuntary approximation. To solve a problem on a quantum annealer, it has to be expressed as an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). In this work, we thus study whether systematically approximating QUBO representations of the MAX-3SAT problem can improve the solution quality when solved on contemporary quantum hardware, compared to using exact, non-approximated QUBO representations. For a MAX-3SAT instance consisting of a 3SAT formula with$n$variables and$m$clauses, we propose a method of systematically creating approximate QUBO representations of dimension$(n\times n)$, which is significantly smaller than the QUBO matrices of any exact, non-approximated MAX-3SAT QUBO transformation. In an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that using our QUBO approximations for solving MAX-3SAT problems on D-Wave's quantum annealer Advantage_System6.4 can yield better results than using state-of-the-art exact QUBO transformations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using naive QUBO approximation methods, based on removing values from exact$(n+m)\times(n+m)-\mathbf{dimensional}$QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT instances, is ineffective.

arXiv:2409.15891•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•4 citations

Applications and Computational Advances for Solving the QUBO Model

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Yu Du

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•13 citations

Enhancing a QUBO solver via data driven multi-start and its application to vehicle routing problem

Whei Yeap Suen, Matthieu Parizy, Hoong Chuin Lau

Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models have garnered growing interests as a strong alternative modelling framework for solving combinatorial optimization problems. A wide variety of optimization problems that are usually studied using conventional Operations Research approaches can be formulated as QUBO problems. However, QUBO solvers do not guarantee optimality when solving optimization problems. Instead, obtaining high quality solutions using QUBO solvers entails tuning of multiple parameters. Here in our work, we conjecture that the initial states adjustment method used in QUBO solvers can be improved, where careful tuning will yield overall better results. We propose a data-driven multi-start algorithm that complements the QUBO solver (namely Fujitsu Digital Annealer) in solving constrained optimization problems. We implemented our algorithm on a variety of capacitated vehicle routing problem instances, and empirical results show that different initial state adjustment methods do make a difference in the quality of solutions obtained by the QUBO solver.

Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion)•Jul 9, 2022•6 citations

The Bipartite QUBO

Abraham P. Punnen

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation
As contemporary quantum computers do not possess error correction, any calculation performed by these devices can be considered an involuntary approximation. To solve a problem on a quantum annealer, it has to be expressed as an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). In this work, we thus study whether systematically approximating QUBO representations of the MAX-3SAT problem can improve the solution quality when solved on contemporary quantum hardware, compared to using exact, non-approximated QUBO representations. For a MAX-3SAT instance consisting of a 3SAT formula withnnnvariables andmmmclauses, we propose a method of systematically creating approximate QUBO representations of dimension(n×n)(n\times n)(n×n), which is significantly smaller than the QUBO matrices of any exact, non-approximated MAX-3SAT QUBO transformation. In an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that using our QUBO approximations for solving MAX-3SAT problems on D-Wave's quantum annealer Advantage_System6.4 can yield better results than using state-of-the-art exact QUBO transformations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using naive QUBO approximation methods, based on removing values from exact(n+m)×(n+m)−dimensional(n+m)\times(n+m)-\mathbf{dimensional}(n+m)×(n+m)−dimensionalQUBO representations of MAX-3SAT instances, is ineffective.
Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models have garnered growing interests as a strong alternative modelling framework for solving combinatorial optimization problems. A wide variety of optimization problems that are usually studied using conventional Operations Research approaches can be formulated as QUBO problems. However, QUBO solvers do not guarantee optimality when solving optimization problems. Instead, obtaining high quality solutions using QUBO solvers entails tuning of multiple parameters. Here in our work, we conjecture that the initial states adjustment method used in QUBO solvers can be improved, where careful tuning will yield overall better results. We propose a data-driven multi-start algorithm that complements the QUBO solver (namely Fujitsu Digital Annealer) in solving constrained optimization problems. We implemented our algorithm on a variety of capacitated vehicle routing problem instances, and empirical results show that different initial state adjustment methods do make a difference in the quality of solutions obtained by the QUBO solver.