Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Science

Sharp and Unsharp Quantum Incompatibilities. A Comparison and Some Foundational Questions

Roberto Beneduci, María Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Giuseppe Sergioli

Published Jul 10, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10699-025-09988-x

Related papers

Sharp and Unsharp Quantum Effects

Stanley Gudder

Advances in Applied Mathematics•Feb 1, 1998•21 citations

Robust device-independent characterization of sharpness and incompatibility of unsharp instruments

Qian Zhang, Kai-Yu Yuan, Yan-Xin Rong +3 more

Unsharp measurements are key resources for tasks that balance information gain and disturbance, but certifying them without device assumptions remains a challenge. We propose a fully device-independent protocol for characterizing unsharp instruments, based on an entanglement-assisted sequential quantum random access code, where the first decoder is allowed to communicate her measurement setting to the second. This communication-enhanced scheme creates a decoding regime in which both decoders surpass classical bounds, enabling tight quantification of sharpness and direct quantification of measurement incompatibility beyond noncommunicating protocols. Experimentally, we implement tunable unsharp measurements using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, observing the predicted sequential enhancement in decoding probability. Additionally, we achieve significantly narrower sharpness intervals and incompatibility quantification across multiple target sharpness values. Our results show that communication is a powerful operational resource for certifying precisely unsharp instruments and advancing device-independent quantum information protocols.

quant-pharXiv:2608.06726•Physical Review A•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations

from unsharp to sharp quantum observables

CATTANEO G., Giuseppe Antonio NISTICO'

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Experimental characterisation of unsharp qubit measurements in a semi-device-independent setting

Hammad Anwer, Sadiq Muhammad, Walid Cherifi +3 more

Unsharp measurements are increasingly important in quantum information theory and tests of quantum theory. Here, in a semi-device-independent setting, we experimentally demonstrate their noise-robust characterisation while only assuming that the involved devices operate on qubits and that the detected events constitute a fair sample. Our experiment involves three parties; the first party prepares a qubit system, the second party performs operations which returns both a classical and quantum outcome and the later is measured by the third party. From the measured probabilities we show nearly-optimal quantum correlations for unsharp observales, falsify every model in which the operations are simulated with stochastic projective qubit measurements and obtain narrow intervals to which the sharpness parameter can be confined. Moreover, we also certify two sequential pairs of incompatible measurements and quantify their degree of incompatibility. Finally, we discuss our characterisation of the sharpness parameter as compared to that obtained from a tomographic scheme subjected to small errors.

•Jan 14, 2020•0 citations

Concepts surrounding incompatibility in quantum physics

Neil Stevens

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

From Boolean algebras to effect algebras: Sharp and unsharp logic in classical and quantum systems

Atul Kumar Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Singh

This paper examines how logical structures represent sharp and unsharp propositions in classical and quantum systems. Classical sharp logic is modeled by Boolean algebras, where propositions have bivalent truth values, complements are globally defined, and distributivity holds. Quantum sharp logic is modeled by orthomodular lattices of closed Hilbert-space subspaces or projection operators; it retains definite yes–no outcomes for ideal measurements but rejects the Boolean assumptions of global truth valuation and distributivity. Classical unsharp logic uses fuzzy membership or probabilistic truth values to describe vagueness and incomplete information, whereas quantum unsharp logic is expressed through effects and effect algebras, which capture noisy, inefficient, and generalized measurements. The paper’s central question is which algebraic structure is appropriate for each combination of classical or quantum behavior and sharp or unsharp measurement. The analysis shows that the four cases form a coherent hierarchy: Boolean algebras describe deterministic classical events, orthomodular lattices describe ideal quantum propositions, fuzzy or probabilistic models describe classical partial truth, and effect algebras describe realistic quantum effects. This classification clarifies the mathematical and physical role of unsharpness and explains why effect algebras are needed beyond projection-based quantum logic.

Engineering and Applied Science Letters•Aug 12, 2026•0 citations
Unsharp measurements are key resources for tasks that balance information gain and disturbance, but certifying them without device assumptions remains a challenge. We propose a fully device-independent protocol for characterizing unsharp instruments, based on an entanglement-assisted sequential quantum random access code, where the first decoder is allowed to communicate her measurement setting to the second. This communication-enhanced scheme creates a decoding regime in which both decoders surpass classical bounds, enabling tight quantification of sharpness and direct quantification of measurement incompatibility beyond noncommunicating protocols. Experimentally, we implement tunable unsharp measurements using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, observing the predicted sequential enhancement in decoding probability. Additionally, we achieve significantly narrower sharpness intervals and incompatibility quantification across multiple target sharpness values. Our results show that communication is a powerful operational resource for certifying precisely unsharp instruments and advancing device-independent quantum information protocols.
Unsharp measurements are increasingly important in quantum information theory and tests of quantum theory. Here, in a semi-device-independent setting, we experimentally demonstrate their noise-robust characterisation while only assuming that the involved devices operate on qubits and that the detected events constitute a fair sample. Our experiment involves three parties; the first party prepares a qubit system, the second party performs operations which returns both a classical and quantum outcome and the later is measured by the third party. From the measured probabilities we show nearly-optimal quantum correlations for unsharp observales, falsify every model in which the operations are simulated with stochastic projective qubit measurements and obtain narrow intervals to which the sharpness parameter can be confined. Moreover, we also certify two sequential pairs of incompatible measurements and quantify their degree of incompatibility. Finally, we discuss our characterisation of the sharpness parameter as compared to that obtained from a tomographic scheme subjected to small errors.
This paper examines how logical structures represent sharp and unsharp propositions in classical and quantum systems. Classical sharp logic is modeled by Boolean algebras, where propositions have bivalent truth values, complements are globally defined, and distributivity holds. Quantum sharp logic is modeled by orthomodular lattices of closed Hilbert-space subspaces or projection operators; it retains definite yes–no outcomes for ideal measurements but rejects the Boolean assumptions of global truth valuation and distributivity. Classical unsharp logic uses fuzzy membership or probabilistic truth values to describe vagueness and incomplete information, whereas quantum unsharp logic is expressed through effects and effect algebras, which capture noisy, inefficient, and generalized measurements. The paper’s central question is which algebraic structure is appropriate for each combination of classical or quantum behavior and sharp or unsharp measurement. The analysis shows that the four cases form a coherent hierarchy: Boolean algebras describe deterministic classical events, orthomodular lattices describe ideal quantum propositions, fuzzy or probabilistic models describe classical partial truth, and effect algebras describe realistic quantum effects. This classification clarifies the mathematical and physical role of unsharpness and explains why effect algebras are needed beyond projection-based quantum logic.