Abstract Tunneling time as an important quantity to characterize tunneling process has not been well defined yet in quantum mechanics. In this paper, we adopt the definition of tunneling time given in [S.-C. Li, New J. Phys. 24, 083033 (2022)] to investigate the time spent by a macroscopic quantum wave packet passing through a Gaussian barrier. We show a general scenario of tunneling times in different energy regimes and find that it has a good agreement with the scenario for a rectangular barrier, which verifies the validity of the above definition of tunneling time for the Gaussian barrier. The influence of both incident energy of wave packet and barrier parameters on tunneling time is discussed thoroughly. The connection between tunneling time and tunneling probability for the Gaussian barrier is established as well. In particular, we use the product of the variances of position and momentum to quantify the deformation of wave packet caused by tunneling process and demonstrate that different behaviors of the variances strongly support our oft-emphasized division of energy regimes.
Abstract Tunneling time as an important quantity to characterize tunneling process has not been well defined yet in quantum mechanics. In this paper, we adopt the definition of tunneling time given in [S.-C. Li, New J. Phys. 24, 083033 (2022)] to investigate the time spent by a macroscopic quantum wave packet passing through a Gaussian barrier. We show a general scenario of tunneling times in different energy regimes and find that it has a good agreement with the scenario for a rectangular barrier, which verifies the validity of the above definition of tunneling time for the Gaussian barrier. The influence of both incident energy of wave packet and barrier parameters on tunneling time is discussed thoroughly. The connection between tunneling time and tunneling probability for the Gaussian barrier is established as well. In particular, we use the product of the variances of position and momentum to quantify the deformation of wave packet caused by tunneling process and demonstrate that different behaviors of the variances strongly support our oft-emphasized division of energy regimes.
Abstract We theoretically study the tunneling time by investigating a wave packet of Bose-condensed atoms passing through a square barrier. We find that the tunneling time exhibits different scaling laws in different energy regimes. For negative incident energy of the wave packet, counterintuitively, the tunneling time decreases very rapidly with decreasing incident velocity. In contrast, for positive incident energy smaller than the barrier height, the tunneling time increases slowly and then reaches a maximum, which is in agreement with the Larmor clock experiments. The effect of the barrier width related to the uncertainty principle on the maximum tunneling time is also addressed. Our work provides a general scenario of tunneling time that can be used to understand and explain the controversy over tunneling time.
In this paper, we discuss the tunneling time of a quantum particle through a rectangular barrier. The reflection and transmission times associated with the wave packets representing the particle are discussed. By using an initial Gaussian momentum distribution, we carry out a comparative analysis of the stationary phases of the incident, reflected, and transmitted wave packets leading to the reflection and transmission times $\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}_{R}$ and $\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}_{T},$ respectively. In the present treatment of this old and very known problem we take into account the deformations of the reflected and transmitted momentum distributions. These deformations produce a dependence of the reflection and transmission times on the location of the initial wave packet. In a parallel calculation, by numerically monitoring the time evolution of the system, we characterize a reflection and a transmission time. Such times agree with the ones obtained via the stationary phase method.
Analytic expressions are given for the time spent by a particle tunneling through a potential barrier. The expressions are derived for an incident wave packet which is initially Gaussian, centered about a point an arbitrary distance away from a rectangular potential barrier and moving toward the barrier with constant average velocity. Upon collision with the barrier, the packet splits into a transmitted and a reflected packet. The resultant transmission time is positive, nonzero and in principle measurable. Although the transmission time becomes quite large as the incident kinetic energy becomes very small, in general, for nonzero incident momentum and finite potential barriers which are neither very thick nor very thin, the transmission times are less than the time that would be required for the incident particle to travel a distance equal to the barrier thickness. The transmission times for metal-insulator-metal thin film sandwiches, given approximately by δt3=ℏ/(Efφ)12, where Ef is the Fermi energy of the metal, and φ the vacuum work function, are of the order of 10−16 sec, compared to RC time constants of about 10−13 sec.
The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.
The transmission of wave packets through barriers by tunneling is studied in detail by the method of quantum molecular dynamics. The distribution of the arrival times of a tunneling packet in front of and behind a barrier and the momentum distribution function of the packet are calculated. The average position and average momentum of the packet and their spread are investigated. It is found that below the barrier a part of the packet is reflected, and a Gaussian barrier increases the average momentum of the transmitted packet and its spread in momentum space.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.