Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Phase-Asymptotic Recursion and the Ontology of Observation: Toward a Coherence-Based Geometry of Space-Time

Mahammad Ayvazov

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.5256427

Related papers

Phase Recursion Ontology

Anthony Castro

Phase Recursion Ontology (PRO) is a formal research architecture and metaphysical grammar proposing that reality can be modeled as a recursively evolving phase state. Synthesizing foundational insights from John Archibald Wheeler, James Clerk Maxwell, Stephen Wolfram, Stephen Tegmark, and David Bohm, PRO argues that information, fields, computation, matter, biology, and consciousness are not separate ontological layers, but scale-dependent projections of a single underlying recursive update operator. Rather than treating "frequency, energy, and vibration" as mystical aphorisms, PRO interprets them as concrete mathematical signatures of recursive stability: frequency as recurring distinguishability, vibration as phase-structured recurrence under constraint, and energy as a formal measure of transformation capacity. The work establishes a rigorous axiomatic system (Level 0 Foundational and Level 1 Computational Axioms), an Everettian-Gödelian framework of Epistemic Absolutions, and Three Predictive Rationalities (Formal Coherence, Physical Translation, and Empirical Humility) to solve the problem of agency and self-referential observation without violating causality or physical law. PRO frames the observer as an internal recursive projection that models the state space, evaluates possible futures, and feeds intent back into the continuing evolution of the System. Designed as an open collaborative framework, this volume bridges formal mathematics and lived meaning, outlining a multi-stage roadmap for future mathematical formalization, computational simulation, and empirical testing.

•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations

Probabilistic Ontology and Space-Time: Updating an Historical Debate

Massimo Pauri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•0 citations

Generative Paper 11 — Quantum and Relative Projection Spaces: From Organizational Geometry to Quantum & Relative Geometry

Mortaza Zabihi

The transition from the Organization-Based Framework to the Constraint-Based Framework requires a fundamental reinterpretation of geometric description. In Phase 1, physical systems were reconstructed through the Organizational Coordinate System, where the execution vector χ represented the continuous realization of recursive organization. This geometry provided a complete generative description of how stable physical structures emerge through recursive execution. However, the generative geometry of recursive execution is not identical to the geometry directly accessible through observation. The reason is not that the Organizational Coordinate System becomes incomplete or incorrect. Rather, recursive execution contains multiple complementary aspects that are not simultaneously preserved within a single observable projection. This paper introduces the concept of Complementary Projection Spaces as the geometric foundation of the Constraint-Based Framework. The central argument is that the execution vector χ contains two fundamental components: the execution component associated with continuous recursive progression, and the organizational component associated with the constraints preserved during that progression. Projection does not eliminate either component. Instead, it transforms the observer’s geometric perspective by making different aspects of recursive execution explicitly observable. The organizational component of χ gives rise to the Quantum Projection Space, where projected constraints and localized organizational realizations become the primary observable structures. Within this geometry, continuous execution remains implicit, and time appears only as an ordering relation between projected realizations. The execution component of χ gives rise to the Relative Projection Space, where recursive progression and relational continuity become explicitly represented. Within this geometry, time is no longer merely an ordering parameter but becomes a fundamental component of observable relational structure. The existence of these complementary projection spaces provides a geometric explanation for the apparent conceptual difference between quantum mechanics and relativity. They do not represent separate physical realities or independent generative mechanisms. Instead, they represent different observable geometries obtained from the same underlying recursive execution. The introduction of Complementary Projection Spaces therefore establishes the geometric foundation of Phase 2. The Organizational Coordinate System remains the hidden generative geometry from which physical systems emerge. The Quantum Projection Space and Relative Projection Space become complementary observable geometries through which constraint-based descriptions of quantum and relativistic systems can be constructed. This article is part of a broader theoretical program investigating the emergence of spacetime, geometry, and physical structure from the ψ–Θ–χ continuum. Earlier works in this program explore different layers and stages of the framework, ranging from foundational pre-structural regimes to geometric realization: Generative Paper 1: Infinite Generative Field as the Origin of Physical Reality Generative Paper 2: Vacuum as the Minimal Condition of Definability Generative Paper 3: Primitive Recursive Functions as the Architecture of Recursive Organization Generative Paper 4: From Recursive Organization to the ψ–Θ–χ Architecture Generative Paper 5: Organizational Space and Organizational Fields Generative Paper 6: Elementary Fiber Dynamics — The Building Block of Photon Formation Generative Paper 7: Persistent Cyclic Organization Toward Photon Formation Generative Paper 8: Photon Dynamics Through Cyclic Reconstruction Generative Paper 9: From Photon to Electromagnetism Generative Review 1: From a Single Generative Field to Photon and Electromagnetism Generative Paper 10: Organizational Constraints: The Foundation of the Constraint-Based Framework Generative Paper 11 — Constraint Architecture in Generative Framework Generative Paper 12 — Quantum and Relative Projection Spaces: From Organizational Geometry to Quantum & Relative Geometry Generative Paper 13 — Vector Point & Projected History: Architecture of Quantum Projection Geometry Generative Paper 14 — Presentation-Level Domain Constraint: From Symmetry through Hilbert Space & State Space to Quantum State Generative Paper 15 — Presentation-Level Mapping Constraint: From Operational Rules to Measurement

•Aug 9, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coherence and Phase Ontology: Empiricizing the Improbable through Resonant Computation

Mahammad Ayvazov

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

TSO: Rescuing Schroedingers Cat in the Time–Space Oscillation Framework

de Leeuw, Norman

TSO: Rescuing Schrödinger’s Cat Quantum paradoxes like Schrödinger’s Cat have long challenged our understanding of reality, suggesting worlds where particles—and even cats—exist simultaneously alive and dead. This work introduces the framework of Time–Space Oscillators (TSO), which models particles as six-dimensional helical oscillators embedded in a multiversal 6D phase space. Generalising its structure using recursive Cauchy integrals and analytic continuation, we show how the apparent multiplicity of outcomes arises naturally from oscillatory structure rather than ontological duplication, providing a geometric resolution to quantum paradoxes and a pathway for the emergence of classicality without external decoherence. Building on prior work on TSO dimensionality constructions (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17849427), Rescuing Schrödinger’s Cat refines the vision of quantum branching, emphasizing particle singularity while capturing the richness of probabilistic observation. This approach bridges foundational physics, visualizable geometry, and analytic recursion, offering a fresh lens on the quantum–classical boundary and retrocausal phenomena. For newcomers, a structured overview of the foundational TSO papers is available in “Time Space Oscillations. Introduction papers” (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1767154). It guides readers through the core principles of TSO—Time dilation and Gravity equivalence, TSO & EM, TSO & QM—and shows how the present work fits into the broader framework. For an overview of related work and publications, visit:https://ndl1971.github.io/time-space-oscillations/ Version 0.91 Corrected conjugate relationship Z_2+1/Z_2 instead of Z_2 in Cauchy recursion. It does not impact the result or overall message.

•Dec 12, 2025•4 citations

Space-time structure and measurement theory

Jean-Pierre Antoine, Alan Gleit

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•May 1, 1971•9 citations
Phase Recursion Ontology (PRO) is a formal research architecture and metaphysical grammar proposing that reality can be modeled as a recursively evolving phase state. Synthesizing foundational insights from John Archibald Wheeler, James Clerk Maxwell, Stephen Wolfram, Stephen Tegmark, and David Bohm, PRO argues that information, fields, computation, matter, biology, and consciousness are not separate ontological layers, but scale-dependent projections of a single underlying recursive update operator. Rather than treating "frequency, energy, and vibration" as mystical aphorisms, PRO interprets them as concrete mathematical signatures of recursive stability: frequency as recurring distinguishability, vibration as phase-structured recurrence under constraint, and energy as a formal measure of transformation capacity. The work establishes a rigorous axiomatic system (Level 0 Foundational and Level 1 Computational Axioms), an Everettian-Gödelian framework of Epistemic Absolutions, and Three Predictive Rationalities (Formal Coherence, Physical Translation, and Empirical Humility) to solve the problem of agency and self-referential observation without violating causality or physical law. PRO frames the observer as an internal recursive projection that models the state space, evaluates possible futures, and feeds intent back into the continuing evolution of the System. Designed as an open collaborative framework, this volume bridges formal mathematics and lived meaning, outlining a multi-stage roadmap for future mathematical formalization, computational simulation, and empirical testing.
The transition from the Organization-Based Framework to the Constraint-Based Framework requires a fundamental reinterpretation of geometric description. In Phase 1, physical systems were reconstructed through the Organizational Coordinate System, where the execution vector χ represented the continuous realization of recursive organization. This geometry provided a complete generative description of how stable physical structures emerge through recursive execution. However, the generative geometry of recursive execution is not identical to the geometry directly accessible through observation. The reason is not that the Organizational Coordinate System becomes incomplete or incorrect. Rather, recursive execution contains multiple complementary aspects that are not simultaneously preserved within a single observable projection. This paper introduces the concept of Complementary Projection Spaces as the geometric foundation of the Constraint-Based Framework. The central argument is that the execution vector χ contains two fundamental components: the execution component associated with continuous recursive progression, and the organizational component associated with the constraints preserved during that progression. Projection does not eliminate either component. Instead, it transforms the observer’s geometric perspective by making different aspects of recursive execution explicitly observable. The organizational component of χ gives rise to the Quantum Projection Space, where projected constraints and localized organizational realizations become the primary observable structures. Within this geometry, continuous execution remains implicit, and time appears only as an ordering relation between projected realizations. The execution component of χ gives rise to the Relative Projection Space, where recursive progression and relational continuity become explicitly represented. Within this geometry, time is no longer merely an ordering parameter but becomes a fundamental component of observable relational structure. The existence of these complementary projection spaces provides a geometric explanation for the apparent conceptual difference between quantum mechanics and relativity. They do not represent separate physical realities or independent generative mechanisms. Instead, they represent different observable geometries obtained from the same underlying recursive execution. The introduction of Complementary Projection Spaces therefore establishes the geometric foundation of Phase 2. The Organizational Coordinate System remains the hidden generative geometry from which physical systems emerge. The Quantum Projection Space and Relative Projection Space become complementary observable geometries through which constraint-based descriptions of quantum and relativistic systems can be constructed. This article is part of a broader theoretical program investigating the emergence of spacetime, geometry, and physical structure from the ψ–Θ–χ continuum. Earlier works in this program explore different layers and stages of the framework, ranging from foundational pre-structural regimes to geometric realization: Generative Paper 1: Infinite Generative Field as the Origin of Physical Reality Generative Paper 2: Vacuum as the Minimal Condition of Definability Generative Paper 3: Primitive Recursive Functions as the Architecture of Recursive Organization Generative Paper 4: From Recursive Organization to the ψ–Θ–χ Architecture Generative Paper 5: Organizational Space and Organizational Fields Generative Paper 6: Elementary Fiber Dynamics — The Building Block of Photon Formation Generative Paper 7: Persistent Cyclic Organization Toward Photon Formation Generative Paper 8: Photon Dynamics Through Cyclic Reconstruction Generative Paper 9: From Photon to Electromagnetism Generative Review 1: From a Single Generative Field to Photon and Electromagnetism Generative Paper 10: Organizational Constraints: The Foundation of the Constraint-Based Framework Generative Paper 11 — Constraint Architecture in Generative Framework Generative Paper 12 — Quantum and Relative Projection Spaces: From Organizational Geometry to Quantum & Relative Geometry Generative Paper 13 — Vector Point & Projected History: Architecture of Quantum Projection Geometry Generative Paper 14 — Presentation-Level Domain Constraint: From Symmetry through Hilbert Space & State Space to Quantum State Generative Paper 15 — Presentation-Level Mapping Constraint: From Operational Rules to Measurement
TSO: Rescuing Schrödinger’s Cat Quantum paradoxes like Schrödinger’s Cat have long challenged our understanding of reality, suggesting worlds where particles—and even cats—exist simultaneously alive and dead. This work introduces the framework of Time–Space Oscillators (TSO), which models particles as six-dimensional helical oscillators embedded in a multiversal 6D phase space. Generalising its structure using recursive Cauchy integrals and analytic continuation, we show how the apparent multiplicity of outcomes arises naturally from oscillatory structure rather than ontological duplication, providing a geometric resolution to quantum paradoxes and a pathway for the emergence of classicality without external decoherence. Building on prior work on TSO dimensionality constructions (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17849427), Rescuing Schrödinger’s Cat refines the vision of quantum branching, emphasizing particle singularity while capturing the richness of probabilistic observation. This approach bridges foundational physics, visualizable geometry, and analytic recursion, offering a fresh lens on the quantum–classical boundary and retrocausal phenomena. For newcomers, a structured overview of the foundational TSO papers is available in “Time Space Oscillations. Introduction papers” (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1767154). It guides readers through the core principles of TSO—Time dilation and Gravity equivalence, TSO & EM, TSO & QM—and shows how the present work fits into the broader framework. For an overview of related work and publications, visit:https://ndl1971.github.io/time-space-oscillations/ Version 0.91 Corrected conjugate relationship Z_2+1/Z_2 instead of Z_2 in Cauchy recursion. It does not impact the result or overall message.