Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Elements of Quantum Mechanics II: Open Systems

Gilad Gour

Published Apr 10, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Chapter 3 explores open quantum systems, emphasizing their interactions with environments, unlike isolated closed systems. It introduces the concept of generalized measurements and mixed quantum states, reflecting the complex scenarios arising from these interactions. The chapter utilizes Positive Operator Valued Measures (POVMs) to describe generalized measurements, broadening the conventional approach to quantum measurements. A significant focus is on the evolution of open systems through quantum channels, which illustrate the transfer or transformation of quantum information amid noise and external disturbances. This section underpins the dynamics open systems exhibit, critical for understanding quantum computing and information processing in realistic settings. Through practical examples, the chapter elucidates how environmental factors influence quantum information, vital for applications in quantum technologies. It aims to equip readers with foundational knowledge of open quantum systems, highlighting their importance in the broader context of quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1017/9781009560870.003

Related papers

Quantum State Dynamics and Information Transmission in Open Systems

Safae Gaidi, Yassine Dakir, Abdallah Slaoui +2 more

This chapter provides a foundational overview of the mathematical and physical concepts underlying quantum states, linear maps, and their extensions in the context of open quantum systems. We begin with the definition and properties of quantum states, emphasizing the role of density matrices in capturing both pure and mixed states. We then explore the dynamics of quantum states under linear and completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) maps, which form the backbone of quantum operations in theory and experiment. Two extensions are presented: a quantitative treatment of non-Markovianity, characterizing memory effects in quantum evolutions, and an application to quantum teleportation, which utilizes entanglement to transmit quantum information. This chapter aims to connect the formalism of quantum operations with emerging techniques in quantum information science.

CRC Press eBooks•May 15, 2026•0 citations

Introduction to decoherence and noise in open quantum systems

Daniel A. Lidar, Todd A. Brun

Introduction This chapter gives the physical and mathematical basis of decoherence in quantum systems, with particular emphasis on its importance in quantum information theory and quantum computation. We assume that the reader is already familiar with the basics of quantum mechanics, such as wave functions, the Schrödinger equation, and Hilbert spaces, which are covered in standard textbooks. Nevertheless, all basic concepts will be at least briefly defined and described. A working knowledge of graduate-level linear algebra and calculus is also assumed. In quantum information processing, the term decoherence is often used loosely to describe any kind of noise that can affect a quantum system. This can include sources of noise that seem, qualitatively, to be quite different from each other. These noise sources include: (i) Random driving forces from the environment (e.g., Brownian motion). (ii) Interactions that produce entanglement between the system and the environment. (iii) Statistical imprecision in the experimental controls on the system (e.g., timing errors, frequency fluctuations, etc.). Remarkably, all of these sources of noise can be described by an almost identical mathematical framework, in which pure quantum states can evolve into mixed quantum states, and the quantum effects necessary for information processing – interference, entanglement, and reversible evolution – are disrupted. The chapter begins by examining a highly schematic model of decoherence, involving systems of qubits, but uses this model to present the mathematical formalism used in describing more realistic systems as well.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 5, 2013•3 citations

Elements of Quantum Mechanics I: Closed Systems

Gilad Gour

Chapter 2 serves as an introduction to the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, focusing on closed systems. It begins with the historic Stern–Gerlach experiment, highlighting the discovery of quantum spin. The narrative then shifts to the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, covering inner product spaces, Hilbert spaces, and linear operators. These concepts are crucial for understanding the behavior and manipulation of quantum states, the core of quantum information theory. The chapter further explores the encoding of information in quantum states, emphasizing qubits, and discusses quantum measurements, revealing the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. Additionally, it addresses hidden variable models, offering insights into the deterministic versus probabilistic interpretations of quantum phenomena. Unitary evolution and the Schrödinger equation are introduced as mechanisms for the time evolution of quantum states, showcasing the deterministic evolution in the absence of measurements. This section underscores the dynamic aspect of quantum systems, pivotal for advancements in quantum information theory.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 10, 2025•0 citations

Mixed States and POVMs

George Jaroszkiewicz

Introduction As the decades of the twentieth century rolled on, quantum mechanics (QM) became more and more sophisticated and mathematical. Understanding what this theory means intuitively was confounded not only by nonclassical concepts such as wave–particle duality and quantum interference, but also by issues to do with observation. The Newtonian classical mechanics (CM) paradigm of reality, wherein reductionist laws of physics describe observer-independent dynamics of systems under observation (SUOs) with observer-independent properties, was found to be inadequate. Quantum theorists were confronted with the measurement problem , which attempts to understand, explain, and rationalize the laws of QM that underpin the processes of observation that go on in the laboratory. They are not the same as those of CM in several puzzling respects. Historically, the first sign of the measurement problem was Planck's quantization of energy (Planck, 1900b) and the second was Bohr's veto on radiation damping in hydrogen (Bohr, 1913). These occurred in the first quarter of the twentieth century, a period in physics often referred to as Old Quantum Mechanics . Another indicator that intuition was inadequate was Born's interpretation of the squared modulus of the Schrödinger wave function as a probability density (Born, 1926). That interpretation has everything to do with observers and observation, because probability without an observer is a vacuous concept. Eventually, the projection-valued measure (PVM) formalism emerged, championed by von Neumann in an influential book on the mathematical formulation of QM (von Neumann, 1955). Subsequently, pioneers such as Ludwig (Ludwig, 1983a,b) and Kraus (Kraus, 1974, 1983) refined the theory into the general positive operator-valued measure (POVM) formalism that we shall discuss and use. The quantized detector network (QDN) approach to quantum experiments is most naturally expressed in the PVM formalism, as QDN focuses on the individual detectors in the laboratory. However, the POVM formalism is more general than the PVM formalism, giving a description of multiple detector processes similar to QDN. This raises the question of how the two approaches, QDN and POVM, are related. The aim of this chapter is to explore this relationship. Before we review the PVM and POVM formalisms, we review some essential mathematical concepts.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2017•0 citations

Quantum state discrimination and selected applications

János A. Bergou

Determining the state of a quantum system is a central task in quantum information processing since it encompasses the read-out problem. Very often the optimized state discrimination strategy is a generalized measurement (Positive Operator Valued Measure, POVM). Therefore, we begin with a brief introduction to the theory of generalized measurements and illustrate the power of the concept on examples relevant to applications in quantum cryptography.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Oct 1, 2007•79 citations

Discrimination of quantum states

János A. Bergou

In quantum information processing and quantum computing protocols the carrier of information is a quantum system and information is encoded in the state of a quantum system. After processing the information it has to be read out what is equivalent to determining the final state of the system. When the possible final states are not orthogonal this is a highly nontrivial task that constitutes the general area of what is known as quantum state discrimination. It consists in finding measurement schemes that, according to some figure of merit, will determine the state of the system. Optimized measurement schemes often lead to generalized measurements (Positive Operator Valued Measures [POVMs]). In this tutorial review we illustrate the power of the POVM concept on examples relevant to applications in quantum cryptography. In order to keep the flow of the presentation we give a brief introduction to the quantum theory of measurements, including generalized measurements (POVMs), in the Appendices.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jan 7, 2010•218 citations
Chapter 3 explores open quantum systems, emphasizing their interactions with environments, unlike isolated closed systems. It introduces the concept of generalized measurements and mixed quantum states, reflecting the complex scenarios arising from these interactions. The chapter utilizes Positive Operator Valued Measures (POVMs) to describe generalized measurements, broadening the conventional approach to quantum measurements. A significant focus is on the evolution of open systems through quantum channels, which illustrate the transfer or transformation of quantum information amid noise and external disturbances. This section underpins the dynamics open systems exhibit, critical for understanding quantum computing and information processing in realistic settings. Through practical examples, the chapter elucidates how environmental factors influence quantum information, vital for applications in quantum technologies. It aims to equip readers with foundational knowledge of open quantum systems, highlighting their importance in the broader context of quantum mechanics.
This chapter provides a foundational overview of the mathematical and physical concepts underlying quantum states, linear maps, and their extensions in the context of open quantum systems. We begin with the definition and properties of quantum states, emphasizing the role of density matrices in capturing both pure and mixed states. We then explore the dynamics of quantum states under linear and completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) maps, which form the backbone of quantum operations in theory and experiment. Two extensions are presented: a quantitative treatment of non-Markovianity, characterizing memory effects in quantum evolutions, and an application to quantum teleportation, which utilizes entanglement to transmit quantum information. This chapter aims to connect the formalism of quantum operations with emerging techniques in quantum information science.
Introduction This chapter gives the physical and mathematical basis of decoherence in quantum systems, with particular emphasis on its importance in quantum information theory and quantum computation. We assume that the reader is already familiar with the basics of quantum mechanics, such as wave functions, the Schrödinger equation, and Hilbert spaces, which are covered in standard textbooks. Nevertheless, all basic concepts will be at least briefly defined and described. A working knowledge of graduate-level linear algebra and calculus is also assumed. In quantum information processing, the term decoherence is often used loosely to describe any kind of noise that can affect a quantum system. This can include sources of noise that seem, qualitatively, to be quite different from each other. These noise sources include: (i) Random driving forces from the environment (e.g., Brownian motion). (ii) Interactions that produce entanglement between the system and the environment. (iii) Statistical imprecision in the experimental controls on the system (e.g., timing errors, frequency fluctuations, etc.). Remarkably, all of these sources of noise can be described by an almost identical mathematical framework, in which pure quantum states can evolve into mixed quantum states, and the quantum effects necessary for information processing – interference, entanglement, and reversible evolution – are disrupted. The chapter begins by examining a highly schematic model of decoherence, involving systems of qubits, but uses this model to present the mathematical formalism used in describing more realistic systems as well.
Chapter 2 serves as an introduction to the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, focusing on closed systems. It begins with the historic Stern–Gerlach experiment, highlighting the discovery of quantum spin. The narrative then shifts to the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, covering inner product spaces, Hilbert spaces, and linear operators. These concepts are crucial for understanding the behavior and manipulation of quantum states, the core of quantum information theory. The chapter further explores the encoding of information in quantum states, emphasizing qubits, and discusses quantum measurements, revealing the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. Additionally, it addresses hidden variable models, offering insights into the deterministic versus probabilistic interpretations of quantum phenomena. Unitary evolution and the Schrödinger equation are introduced as mechanisms for the time evolution of quantum states, showcasing the deterministic evolution in the absence of measurements. This section underscores the dynamic aspect of quantum systems, pivotal for advancements in quantum information theory.
Introduction As the decades of the twentieth century rolled on, quantum mechanics (QM) became more and more sophisticated and mathematical. Understanding what this theory means intuitively was confounded not only by nonclassical concepts such as wave–particle duality and quantum interference, but also by issues to do with observation. The Newtonian classical mechanics (CM) paradigm of reality, wherein reductionist laws of physics describe observer-independent dynamics of systems under observation (SUOs) with observer-independent properties, was found to be inadequate. Quantum theorists were confronted with the measurement problem , which attempts to understand, explain, and rationalize the laws of QM that underpin the processes of observation that go on in the laboratory. They are not the same as those of CM in several puzzling respects. Historically, the first sign of the measurement problem was Planck's quantization of energy (Planck, 1900b) and the second was Bohr's veto on radiation damping in hydrogen (Bohr, 1913). These occurred in the first quarter of the twentieth century, a period in physics often referred to as Old Quantum Mechanics . Another indicator that intuition was inadequate was Born's interpretation of the squared modulus of the Schrödinger wave function as a probability density (Born, 1926). That interpretation has everything to do with observers and observation, because probability without an observer is a vacuous concept. Eventually, the projection-valued measure (PVM) formalism emerged, championed by von Neumann in an influential book on the mathematical formulation of QM (von Neumann, 1955). Subsequently, pioneers such as Ludwig (Ludwig, 1983a,b) and Kraus (Kraus, 1974, 1983) refined the theory into the general positive operator-valued measure (POVM) formalism that we shall discuss and use. The quantized detector network (QDN) approach to quantum experiments is most naturally expressed in the PVM formalism, as QDN focuses on the individual detectors in the laboratory. However, the POVM formalism is more general than the PVM formalism, giving a description of multiple detector processes similar to QDN. This raises the question of how the two approaches, QDN and POVM, are related. The aim of this chapter is to explore this relationship. Before we review the PVM and POVM formalisms, we review some essential mathematical concepts.
In quantum information processing and quantum computing protocols the carrier of information is a quantum system and information is encoded in the state of a quantum system. After processing the information it has to be read out what is equivalent to determining the final state of the system. When the possible final states are not orthogonal this is a highly nontrivial task that constitutes the general area of what is known as quantum state discrimination. It consists in finding measurement schemes that, according to some figure of merit, will determine the state of the system. Optimized measurement schemes often lead to generalized measurements (Positive Operator Valued Measures [POVMs]). In this tutorial review we illustrate the power of the POVM concept on examples relevant to applications in quantum cryptography. In order to keep the flow of the presentation we give a brief introduction to the quantum theory of measurements, including generalized measurements (POVMs), in the Appendices.