Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in computer and information science

Quantum Error Correction in Repetition Codes

James A. Williams, Douglas D. Hodson, Laurence D. Merkle

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-85902-1_7

Related papers

Coherent versus stochastic error injection on a repetition-code logical qubit in superconducting hardware

S. L. M. van der Meer, M. Serra-Peralta, Y. Xin +5 more

The performance of quantum error correction (QEC) codes is limited by the underlying physical noise. Theoretical studies show that coherent and stochastic noise have different effects when performing QEC with either surface or repetition codes. We use the bitflip repetition code, realized in a transmon quantum processor, as a testbed to experimentally study the impact of injecting coherent versus stochastic errors on the logical performance. We adapt a scalable free-fermion simulator to simulate the experiments and we modify a subset sampling technique to efficiently sample stochastic noise in the quantum circuit. In the experiment, we do not observe the difference in logical fidelity predicted by simulation for either the distance-3 or distance-5 repetition codes. We hypothesize that this discrepancy could be explained by small drifts in qubit frequencies, which introduce phase-coherent noise that `stochastifies' the injected coherent errors. Our work contributes to advancing an understanding of how coherent errors affect experimental QEC.

quant-pharXiv:2606.07377•Jun 8, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Error-Correction Codes

Mahn‐Soo Choi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coding and Error Correction

François Chapeau‐Blondeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Experimental repetitive quantum error correction

Julio T. Barreiro, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Monz +5 more

APS•May 1, 2011•0 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Mar 31, 2026•0 citations
The performance of quantum error correction (QEC) codes is limited by the underlying physical noise. Theoretical studies show that coherent and stochastic noise have different effects when performing QEC with either surface or repetition codes. We use the bitflip repetition code, realized in a transmon quantum processor, as a testbed to experimentally study the impact of injecting coherent versus stochastic errors on the logical performance. We adapt a scalable free-fermion simulator to simulate the experiments and we modify a subset sampling technique to efficiently sample stochastic noise in the quantum circuit. In the experiment, we do not observe the difference in logical fidelity predicted by simulation for either the distance-3 or distance-5 repetition codes. We hypothesize that this discrepancy could be explained by small drifts in qubit frequencies, which introduce phase-coherent noise that `stochastifies' the injected coherent errors. Our work contributes to advancing an understanding of how coherent errors affect experimental QEC.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.