This paper reinterprets Richard Feynman's use of negative time within quantum electrodynamics (QED) through the lens of the "Special Time Loop Paradox" (STLP), a thought experiment designed to expose logical contradictions in time-reversal scenarios involving faster-than-light motion.While QED remains one of the most accurate and successful physical theories in terms of experimental predictions, we argue that its reliance on mathematical devices-particularly time-reversed solutions-hints at a deeper incompleteness.Our analysis suggests that these "mathematical tricks" may not merely be calculational tools but indicators of a foundational limitation.
This paper reinterprets Richard Feynman's use of negative time within quantum electrodynamics (QED) through the lens of the "Special Time Loop Paradox" (STLP), a thought experiment designed to expose logical contradictions in time-reversal scenarios involving faster-than-light motion.While QED remains one of the most accurate and successful physical theories in terms of experimental predictions, we argue that its reliance on mathematical devices-particularly time-reversed solutions-hints at a deeper incompleteness.Our analysis suggests that these "mathematical tricks" may not merely be calculational tools but indicators of a foundational limitation.
Feynman’s Quantum Electrodynamics was developed by considering the reversion in time, which means that there is a violation in the causality: something in the future yields a happening in the past. Here we show that the paradox exists when one tries to understand the electron’s motion through a classical trajectory. However, by considering that the electron actually moves through a helical trajectory, the success of Feynman’s theory can be explained without considering the reversion in time.
No one previously noticed there is a second solution to the equations of Richard Feynman’s Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). It makes identical predictions in the lab. The new solution (Reverse-QED) is closer to nature: it is free of quantum weirdness. For example, it eliminates Schrödinger’s cat. This article is the first time the equations of R-QED have been published. The R-QED amplitude is the negative of Feynman’s amplitude. Because of the Born rule, both amplitude and negative amplitude, when squared, produce the same probability to be tested against empirical data. If you were to measure the distance from Los Angeles to New York City with R-QED’s accuracy, it would be exact to the breadth of a human hair. If reality corresponds to the newly discovered R-QED equations, but scientists use the old QED equations, the result would be predictions for the lab that are precisely accurate, but scientists would be unable to construct a coherent picture of the quantum world. R-QED is based on a different picture of how the quantum world is organized. Experiments, including a neutron interferometer experiment we review, show that particles follow waves backward. R-QED integrates in the same direction that the waves travel.
The rampant success of quantum theory is the result of applications of the 'new' quantum \nmechanics of Schrödinger and Heisenberg (1926-7), the Feynman-Schwinger-Tomonaga Quantum \nElectrodynamics (1946-51), the electro-weak theory of Salaam, Weinberg, and Glashow (1967-9), \nand Quantum Chromodynamics (1973-); in fact, this success of `the' quantum theory has depended \non a continuous stream of brilliant and quite disparate mathematical formulations. In this carefully \nconcealed ferment there lie plenty of unresolved difficulties, simply because in churning out fabulously \naccurate calculational tools there has been no sensible explanation of all that is going on. It is even \nargued that such an understanding is nothing to do with physics. A long-standing and famous \nillustration of this is the paradoxical thought-experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935). \nFundamental to all quantum theories, and also their paradoxes, is the location of sub-microscopic \nobjects; or, rather, that the specification of such a location is fraught with mathematical inconsistency. \nThis project encompasses a detailed, critical survey of the tangled history of Position \nwithin quantum theories. The first step is to show that, contrary to appearances, canonical quantum \nmechanics has only a vague notion of locality. After analysing a number of previous attempts at a \n`relativistic quantum mechanics', two lines of thought are considered in detail. The first is the work \nof Wan and students, which is shown to be no real improvement on the usual `nonrelativistic' theory. \nThe second is based on an idea of Dirac's - using backwards-in-time light-cones as the hypersurface \nin space-time. There remain considerable difficulties in the way of producing a consistent scheme here. \nTo keep things nicely stirred up, the author then proposes his own approach - an adaptation \nof Feynman's QED propagators. \nThis new approach is distinguished from Feynman's since the propagator or Green's function \nis not obtained by Feynman's rule. The type of equation solved is also different: instead of an \ninitial-value problem, a solution that obeys a time-symmetric causality criterion is found for an \ninhomogeneous partial differential equation with homogeneous boundary conditions. \nTo make the consideration of locality more precise, some results of Fourier transform theory are \npresented in a form that is directly applicable. \nSomewhat away from the main thrust of the thesis, there is also an attempt to explain the \nmanner in which quantum effects disappear as the number of particles increases in such things as \nexperimental realisations of the EPR and de Broglie thought experiments.
In order to describe the quantum electrodynamic measurement process in a relativistic observer-participant manner, an operator symmetry of "microscopic observer-participation" called Measurement Color (MC) is incorporated into the field theoretic structure of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) in the Heisenberg Picture. It is found that the resultant Measurement Color Quantum Electrodynamics (MC-QED) contains a microscopic quantum electrodynamic arrow of time that emerges dynamically, independent of any thermodynamic or cosmological assumptions. This occurs because the photon has a negative time parity in MC-QED. This causes a spontaneous breaking of the T and CPT symmetry to be generated by the physical requirement that a stable vacuum state exists in the MC-QED formalimm. This dynamically selects operator solutions containing a causal, retarded, quantum electrodynamic arrow of time due in the Heisenberg operator equations of motion. In support of the validity of this idea we show that a classic nonlinear optics experiment in the scientific literature, which involves a Michelson interferometer using combinations of ordinary mirrors and phase conjugate mirrors, contains experimental results which support the idea that the photon has a negative parity under Wigner time reversal and thus carries the arrow of time in the universe.
This paper examines the Foldy-Wouthuysen and Feynman-Gell-Mann representations of the Dirac equation. The analysis is conducted for electrons and positrons interacting with electromagnetic fields. Versions of quantum electrodynamics are considered both within the scope of perturbation theory and in the nonperturbative case with strong electromagnetic fields. Mathematical artifacts that contradicting the physical premises of the theory are identified in the studied representations of the Dirac equation. These mathematical paradoxes are resolved if the theory only employs amplitude states (real and virtual) with positive energies.
Richard Feynman once said, “I think it is safe to say that no one understands Quantum Mechanics”. The well-known article on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox brought forth further doubts on the interpretation of quantum theory. Einstein’s doubt on quantum theory is a doubleedged sword: experimental verification of quantum theory would contradict the hypothesis that speed of light is finite. It has been almost a century since the creation of quantum theory and special relativity, and the relevant doubts brought forward remain unresolved. We posit that the existence of discontinuity points and quantum wormholes would imply superluminal phenomenon or infinite speed of light, which provides for an important supplement to the invariance principle of the speed of light and superluminal phenomena. This can potentially resolve the inconsistency between special relativity and quantum theory.