Post Hartree-Fock II: coupled cluster

Qiming Sun

Justin G. Lietz, Samuel J. Novario, G. R. Jansen +2 more

Udo Benedikt, Alexander A. Auer, Mike Espig +1 more

Udo Benedikt, Karl-Heinz Böhm, Alexander A. Auer

In a previous publication, we have discussed the usage of tensor decomposition in the canonical polyadic (CP) tensor format for electronic structure methods. There, we focused on two-electron integrals and second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2). In this work, we discuss the CP format for Coupled Cluster (CC) theory and present a pilot implementation for the Coupled Cluster Doubles method. We discuss the iterative solution of the CC amplitude equations using tensors in CP representation and present a tensor contraction scheme that minimizes the effort necessary for the rank reductions during the iterations. Furthermore, several details concerning the reduction of complexity of the algorithm, convergence of the CC iterations, truncation errors, and the choice of threshold for chemical accuracy are discussed.

Yiheng Qiu, Thomas M. Henderson, Gustavo E. Scuseria

Projected Hartree-Fock theory provides an accurate description of many kinds of strong correlations but does not properly describe weakly correlated systems. Coupled cluster theory, in contrast, does the opposite. It therefore seems natural to combine the two so as to describe both strong and weak correlations with high accuracy in a relatively black-box manner. Combining the two approaches, however, is made more difficult by the fact that the two techniques are formulated very differently. In earlier work, we showed how to write spin-projected Hartree-Fock in a coupled-cluster-like language. Here, we fill in the gaps in that earlier work. Further, we combine projected Hartree-Fock and coupled cluster theory in a variational formulation and show how the combination performs for the description of the Hubbard Hamiltonian and for several small molecular systems.

Michele Fabrizio