Importance sampling of randomized measurements to probe entanglement

Benoît Vermersch

Aniket Rath, Rick van Bijnen, Andreas Elben +2 more

We show that combining randomized measurement protocols with importance sampling allows for characterizing entanglement in significantly larger quantum systems and in a more efficient way than in previous work. A drastic reduction of statistical errors is obtained using classical techniques of machine learning and tensor networks using partial information on the quantum state. In current experimental settings of engineered many-body quantum systems this significantly increases the (sub-)system sizes for which entanglement can be measured. In particular, we show an exponential reduction of the required number of measurements to estimate the purity of product states and GHZ states.

Sophia Ohnemus, Heinz‐Peter Breuer, Andreas Ketterer

Randomized measurements constitute a simple measurement primitive that exploits the information encoded in the outcome statistics of samples of local quantum measurements defined through randomly selected bases. In this work we exploit the potential of randomized measurements in order to probe the amount of entanglement contained in multiparticle quantum systems as quantified by the multiparticle concurrence. We further present a detailed statistical analysis of the underlying measurement resources required for a confident estimation of the introduced quantifiers using analytical tools from the theory of random matrices. The introduced framework is demonstrated by a series of numerical experiments analyzing the concurrence of typical multiparticle entangled states as well as of ensembles of output states produced by random quantum circuits. Finally, we examine the multiparticle entanglement of mixed states produced by noisy quantum circuits consisting of single- and two-qubit gates with nonvanishing depolarization errors, thus showing that our framework is directly applicable in the noisy intermediate-scale regime.

Hachiro Fujita

Saptarshi Roy, Pritam Halder, Tamal Guha +1 more

Optimized daemonic ergotropy can make entanglement thermodynamically dispensable in measurement-assisted work extraction: for a fixed system marginal, quantum-classical states can reproduce the maximal work obtainable by optimizing the auxiliary measurement. We show that this equivalence is broken when the auxiliary measurement is randomized. For qudit-qubit quantum-classical states under Haar-random projective measurements, we derive upper bounds on the averaged daemonic gain and prove a gain-fluctuation trade-off, showing that any positive randomized gain necessarily entails measurement-induced fluctuations. In sharp contrast, a family of two-qubit entangled pure states attains the algebraic maximum of the gain allowed by a system marginal while remaining fluctuation-free for every measurement basis, yielding at least twice the gain achievable by any quantum-classical state with the same marginal. We further demonstrate that such conclusion holds when general two-qubit separable states are considered positioning randomized gain as a sufficient criterion for entanglement certification. Finally, we show that the entanglement advantage persists under partially randomized measurements sampled from a polar cap around the optimal basis. These results establish randomized daemonic ergotropy as a thermodynamic probe of entanglement and exhibit the connection between measurement-induced work fluctuations on the type of correlations: quantum entanglement vs classical.

Wei Deng, Yong Deng