Optimization is a crucial challenge across various domains, including finance, resource allocation, and mobility. Quantum computing has the potential to redefine the way we handle complex problems by reducing computational complexity and enhancing solution quality. Optimization, particularly of objective functions, stands to benefit significantly from quantum solvers, which leverage principles of quantum mechanics like superposition, entanglement, and tunneling. The Ising and Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models are the most suitable formulations for these solvers, involving binary variables and constraints treated as penalties within the overall objective function. To harness quantum approaches for optimization, two primary strategies are employed: exploiting quantum annealers—special-purpose optimization devices—and designing algorithms based on quantum circuits. This review provides a comprehensive overview of quantum optimization methods, examining their advantages, challenges, and limitations. It demonstrates their application to real-world scenarios and outlines the steps to convert generic optimization problems into quantum-compliant models. Lastly, it discusses available tools and frameworks that facilitate the exploration of quantum solutions for optimization tasks.
Optimization is a crucial challenge across various domains, including finance, resource allocation, and mobility. Quantum computing has the potential to redefine the way we handle complex problems by reducing computational complexity and enhancing solution quality. Optimization, particularly of objective functions, stands to benefit significantly from quantum solvers, which leverage principles of quantum mechanics like superposition, entanglement, and tunneling. The Ising and Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models are the most suitable formulations for these solvers, involving binary variables and constraints treated as penalties within the overall objective function. To harness quantum approaches for optimization, two primary strategies are employed: exploiting quantum annealers—special-purpose optimization devices—and designing algorithms based on quantum circuits. This review provides a comprehensive overview of quantum optimization methods, examining their advantages, challenges, and limitations. It demonstrates their application to real-world scenarios and outlines the steps to convert generic optimization problems into quantum-compliant models. Lastly, it discusses available tools and frameworks that facilitate the exploration of quantum solutions for optimization tasks.
We propose a unified approach for reformulating diverse computational challenges into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models and solving them via quantum annealing. By applying this framework across multiple domains, we demonstrate its flexibility in handling structurally different problems within a single mathematical formulation. The study highlights QUBO’s capability to exploit quantum parallelism, integrate regularization seamlessly, and address ill-posed inverse problems. These advantages position QUBO-based quantum annealing as a promising tool for large-scale optimization and reconstruction tasks, with strong potential for impact in scientific computing, engineering, and data-driven applications.
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative paradigm, leveraging principles of quantum mechanics to tackle computationally intractable problems. This manuscript explores the potential of quantum computing for solving complex engineering problems—specifically optimization, simulation, and data analysis tasks—using technologies and methodologies available up to 2022. We examine both gate-based and quantum annealing approaches, outline experimental frameworks, and compare performance against classical counterparts. Results from simulated benchmark problems demonstrate promising speedups in select cases, though practical adoption is constrained by hardware limitations such as qubit coherence times and noise. The study concludes by highlighting avenues for integrating hybrid quantum-classical workflows in engineering, along with a discussion of current constraints and future directions. Over the past decade, research efforts have focused on understanding how quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement can be harnessed to realize computational advantages for specific problem classes. In particular, combinatorial optimization problems—ubiquitous in engineering design and logistics—offer fertile ground for quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing. Additionally, quantum simulation techniques, including the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), promise to accelerate the modeling of physical systems at the molecular and materials level, potentially informing the design of next-generation structural and functional materials. Beyond raw algorithmic performance, this paper carefully assesses the end‑to‑end workflow, accounting for overheads in problem encoding, error mitigation, and classical post‑processing. We also present a detailed analysis of resource utilization—quantified by qubit counts, circuit depths, and annealing schedules—highlighting trade‑offs between solution quality and execution time. Ultimately, our findings underscore that, while pure quantum speedups remain rare in 2022, hybrid approaches harnessing both quantum and classical resources can yield practical benefits for small‑to‑medium scale engineering tasks. This expanded evaluation provides a roadmap for researchers and practitioners interested in applying quantum computing to real‑world engineering challenges.
This review provides a comprehensive introduction to the current state of optimization through quantum computing, as well as its main methods and highlights. It begins with an overview of the history and principles of quantum computing, followed by a concise explanation of classical optimization techniques. References to key mathematical tools essential for understanding quantum optimization are introduced to assist readers new to the field. The review then explores various quantum optimization techniques, categorized by hardware requirements, pipelining strategies, kernel methods, order, continuity, heuristic and metaheuristic approaches. Graphs and charts are included to illustrate the interconnections between these techniques, enhancing understanding of their complementarity. Finally, the review concludes with some considerations about societal, economic and environmental impacts and a detailed table summarizing the different methods and their applications.
Optimizing objective functions stands to benefit significantly from leveraging quantum computers, promising enhanced solution quality across various application domains in the future. However, harnessing the potential of quantum solvers necessitates formulating problems according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, demanding significant expertise in quantum computation and QUBO formulations. This expertise barrier limits access to quantum solutions. Fortunately, automating the conversion of conventional optimization problems into QUBO formulations presents a solution for promoting accessibility to quantum solvers. This article addresses the unmet need for a comprehensive automatic framework to assist users in utilizing quantum solvers for optimization tasks while preserving interfaces that closely resemble conventional optimization practices. The framework prompts users to specify variables, optimization criteria, as well as validity constraints and, afterwards, allows them to choose the desired solver. Subsequently, it automatically transforms the problem description into a format compatible with the chosen solver and provides the resulting solution. Additionally, the framework offers instruments for analyzing solution validity and quality. Comparative analysis against existing libraries and tools in the literature highlights the comprehensive nature of the proposed framework. Two use cases (the knapsack problem and linear regression) are considered to show the completeness and efficiency of the framework in real-world applications. Finally, the proposed framework represents a significant advancement towards automating quantum computing solutions and widening access to quantum optimization for a broader range of users. The framework is publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
Optimization involves finding the best solution from a set of possible options. Traditional computers employ classical algorithms like gradient descent and simulated annealing to solve these problems. However, as the complexity of problems increases, classical computers encounter limitations in terms of time and resources. Quantum optimization stands as a revolutionary paradigm that harnesses the unique properties of quantum mechanics to tackle complex optimization problems that are beyond the capabilities of classical computers. Quantum computers utilize qubits, the fundamental units of quantum information, which can exist in superpositions of states, enabling them to process a vast number of possibilities simultaneously. Additionally, the phenomenon of entanglement enables qubits to be correlated in ways that classical bits cannot, further enhancing their computational power. In this chapter, the authors will delve into the principles, applications, and current developments in the realm of quantum optimization.
This paper explores the application of Quantum Annealing (QA) to the field of combinatorial optimization. The core idea is to leverage the principles of quantum mechanics, specifically quantum tunneling, to efficiently solve complex optimization problems. We present a framework for utilizing QA to tackle problems represented as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models. The methodology focuses on mapping the problem's constraints and objective function into a form suitable for QA hardware. We discuss the challenges involved in this mapping process, including the limitations of current QA devices and the need for careful problem formulation. Furthermore, we analyze the potential advantages of QA over classical optimization techniques, particularly concerning the exploration of a wider solution space. The research highlights the promise of QACO as a viable approach for tackling computationally demanding combinatorial optimization tasks, offering a novel method to enhance optimization efficiency.