I present a general scheme through which the evidence of a superposition involving distinct classical-like states of a macroscopic system can be probed. The scheme relies on a qubit being coupled to a macroscopic harmonic oscillator in such a way that it can be used to both prepare and probe a macroscopic superposition. Two potentially realizable implementations, one with a flux qubit coupled to a LC circuit, and the other with an ion-trap qubit coupled to the collective motion of several ions, are proposed.
We propose delayed-choice experiments carried out with macroscopic qubits, realized as macroscopically distinct coherent states $|\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $|\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. Quantum superpositions of $|\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $|\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ are created via a unitary interaction $U(\ensuremath{\theta})$ based on a nonlinear Hamiltonian, in analogy with polarizing beam splitters used in photonic experiments. Macroscopic delayed-choice experiments give a compelling reason to develop interpretations not allowing macroscopic retrocausality: This would otherwise suggest changes to the macroscopic qubit value based on a future measurement setting $\ensuremath{\phi}$. We therefore consider weak macroscopic realism (wMR), which for the system at time
t specifies a hidden variable ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ to determine the macroscopic qubit value, independently of $\ensuremath{\phi}$. Using entangled cat states, we demonstrate a quantum eraser where the choice to measure a which-way or wave-type property is delayed. Consistency with wMR is possible, if we interpret the macroscopic qubit value to be determined by ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ without specification of the state at the level of $\ensuremath{\hbar}$. We then demonstrate violations of a delayed-choice Leggett-Garg inequality, and of the Wheeler-Chaves-Lemos-Pienaar dimension witness inequality, for the macroscopic qubits. This negates all two-dimensional nonretrocausal wMR models. However, one can interpret consistently with wMR, thus avoiding conclusions of macroscopic retrocausality, by noting extra dimensions, and that violations require further unitary dynamics
U after
t. The violations are then explained as failure of deterministic macroscopic realism, which specifies the validity of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ prior to the dynamics $U(\ensuremath{\theta})$ determining the measurement setting $\ensuremath{\theta}$. Finally, although there is consistency with wMR for macroscopic observations, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen--type paradoxes pointing to the incompleteness of quantum mechanics exist at a microscopic level, based on fringe distributions.