Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Quantum retrodiction

John Jeffers, Daniel K. L. Oi, Thomas Brougham

Published Dec 24, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum retrodiction, in which the state of a quantum system prior to a measurement is assigned based on the results of that measurement, has had a long history and has been used in quantum optics research for decades. Here we summarize the theory and point out some of the more interesting results, before applying the theory to state identification from multiple shots of an experiment. One surprising result is that we show that a photodetector with low quantum efficiency can discriminate between photonic states better than a detector with a higher efficiency.This article is part of the theme issue 'The quantum theory of light'.

DOI
10.1098/rsta.2023.0338

Related papers

Retrodiction in quantum optics

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

The usual formalism of quantum mechanics is predictive with state vectors being assigned on the basis of past preparation procedures. The retrodictive formalism, in which some state vectors are assigned on the basis of future measurement results is less usual, although it has been known for some time. Although at first sight this formalism may appear to be anticausal and subject to paradoxes, if used carefully it still predicts the same measurable correlations as the more usual approach despite different assignments of state vectors to states in the interval between preparation and measurement of the system. Here we use a procedure which involves retrodiction to examine some quantum optical processes, including a recent state truncation process. The collapse of the state vector occurs at a different time from that for the usual approach underlining the difficulty in regarding the collapse as a real physical process.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Aug 1, 1999•39 citations

Experimental retrodiction of trajectories of single photons in double interferometers

Yuan Yuan, Zhibo Hou, Kang‐Da Wu +3 more

When a photon passes through an interferometer, quantum mechanics does not provide a clear answer as to its past. Quantum retrodiction is a quantitative theory, which endeavors to make statements about the past of a system based on present knowledge. Quantum retrodiction may be used to analyze the past of a photon, that is, its trajectory. Here we experimentally retrodict the trajectories of single photons in double interferometers by measuring the final state of the photon. A sequence of measurements is made on a photon to determine which path the photon followed, so a series of retrodiction of measurement results can be regarded as a photon trajectory. We obtain information about the partial trajectory and the entire trajectory of the photon. Furthermore, we also observe the effect of different measurements in the extraction of trajectory information. Our experiment highlights the application of retrodiction theory to the study of the photon's past, and provides potential application in quantum communications.

Physical Review A•Jun 15, 2018•3 citations

Quantum Retrodiction

Stephen Mark Barnett, John Jeffers, David Thomas Pegg +2 more

Prediction, of course, is the making of statements about the likelihood of future events. retrodiction (or postdiction) is the making of statement about past events. In these lectures we shall study the rules governing retrodictive probabilities both in the quantum and classical domains. In doing so we develop a powerful tool with which to interpret physical phenomena and both analyse and interpret experiments. We use retrodictive methods to analyze a number of phenomena in quantum optics including the familiar photon antibunching, entanglement and ghost imaging and the perhaps less familiar ideas of quantum scissors, quantum computation in the past a single-particle analysis of two-particle interference. Quantum retrodiction is a quantitative theory and the familiar techniques for evolving quantum states and modelling open systems are applicable to retrodictive problems, but only with the introduction of some novel features. We conclude with a few remarks on more philosophical issues related to the arrow of time and wavefunction "collapse" in the measurement process. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Springer eBooks•Aug 29, 2005•6 citations

Quantum theory of unambiguous measurements

Michal Sedlák

Quantum theory of unambiguous measurements In the present paper I formulate a framework that accommodates many unambiguous discrimination problems. I show that the prior information about any type of constituent (state, channel, or observable) allows us to reformulate the discrimination among finite number of alternatives as the discrimination among finite number of average constituents. Using this framework I solve several unambiguous tasks. I present a solution to optimal unambiguous comparison of two ensembles of unknown quantum states. I consider two cases: 1) The two unknown states are arbitrary pure states of qudits. 2) Alternatively, they are coherent states of single-mode optical fields. For this case I propose simple and optimal experimental setup composed of beam-splitters and a photodetector. As a second tasks I consider an unambiguous identification (UI) of coherent states. In this task identical quantum systems are prepared in coherent states and labeled as unknown and reference states, respectively. The promise is that one reference state is the same as the unknown state and the task is to find out unambiguously which one it is. The particular choice of the reference states is unknown to us, and only the probability distribution describing this choice is known. In a general case when multiple copies of unknown and reference states are available I propose a scheme consisting of beamsplitters and photodetectors that is optimal within linear optics. UI can be considered as a search in a quantum database, whose elements are the reference states and the query is represented by the unknown state. This perspective motivated me to show that reference states can be recovered after the measurement and might be used (with reduced success rate) in subsequent UI. Moreover, I analyze the influence of noise in preparation of coherent states on the performance of the proposed setup. Another problem I address is the unambiguous comparison of a pair of unknown qudit unitary channels. I characterize all solutions and identify the optimal ones. I prove that in optimal experiments for comparison of unitary channels the entanglement is necessary. The last task I studied is the unambiguous comparison of unknown non-degenerate projective measurements. I distinguish between measurement devices with apriori labeled and unlabeled outcomes. In both cases only the difference of the measurements can be concluded unambiguously. For the labeled case I derive the optimal strategy if each unknown measurement is used only once. However, if the apparatuses are not labeled, then each measurement device must be used (at least) twice. In particular, for qubit measurement apparatuses with unlabeled outcomes I derive the optimal test state in the two-shots scenario.

arXiv:1003.2448•Acta Physica Slovaca Reviews and Tutorials•Dec 1, 2009•18 citations

Optical state truncation

Stephen Mark Barnett, David Thomas Pegg

We investigate the effects of photodetector imperfections on a recently proposed device designed to truncate physically a state of light. We find that the mixed state produced in the presence of the imperfections has a surprisingly good fidelity with the required state. For convenience and mathematical simplicity, we make use of the quantum-mechanical retrodictive formalism but show that the results are equivalent to those obtainable from more usual predictive formalism.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1999•53 citations

Retrodiction for optical attenuators, amplifiers, and detectors

Ottavia Jedrkiewicz, R. Loudon, John Jeffers

The transformation that an attenuator makes on the state of an optical field is the time reverse of that of an amplifier. Thus predicting the output state for an amplifier is equivalent to retrodicting the input state of an attenuator. We explore the consequences of this equivalence for simple optical quantum communication channels. One counterintuitive consequence is that the mean number of photons sent into an amplifier as retrodicted from a measurement of the number of output photons does not include the contribution of the amplifier noise.

Physical Review A•Sep 17, 2004•19 citations
Quantum retrodiction, in which the state of a quantum system prior to a measurement is assigned based on the results of that measurement, has had a long history and has been used in quantum optics research for decades. Here we summarize the theory and point out some of the more interesting results, before applying the theory to state identification from multiple shots of an experiment. One surprising result is that we show that a photodetector with low quantum efficiency can discriminate between photonic states better than a detector with a higher efficiency.This article is part of the theme issue 'The quantum theory of light'.
The usual formalism of quantum mechanics is predictive with state vectors being assigned on the basis of past preparation procedures. The retrodictive formalism, in which some state vectors are assigned on the basis of future measurement results is less usual, although it has been known for some time. Although at first sight this formalism may appear to be anticausal and subject to paradoxes, if used carefully it still predicts the same measurable correlations as the more usual approach despite different assignments of state vectors to states in the interval between preparation and measurement of the system. Here we use a procedure which involves retrodiction to examine some quantum optical processes, including a recent state truncation process. The collapse of the state vector occurs at a different time from that for the usual approach underlining the difficulty in regarding the collapse as a real physical process.
When a photon passes through an interferometer, quantum mechanics does not provide a clear answer as to its past. Quantum retrodiction is a quantitative theory, which endeavors to make statements about the past of a system based on present knowledge. Quantum retrodiction may be used to analyze the past of a photon, that is, its trajectory. Here we experimentally retrodict the trajectories of single photons in double interferometers by measuring the final state of the photon. A sequence of measurements is made on a photon to determine which path the photon followed, so a series of retrodiction of measurement results can be regarded as a photon trajectory. We obtain information about the partial trajectory and the entire trajectory of the photon. Furthermore, we also observe the effect of different measurements in the extraction of trajectory information. Our experiment highlights the application of retrodiction theory to the study of the photon's past, and provides potential application in quantum communications.
Prediction, of course, is the making of statements about the likelihood of future events. retrodiction (or postdiction) is the making of statement about past events. In these lectures we shall study the rules governing retrodictive probabilities both in the quantum and classical domains. In doing so we develop a powerful tool with which to interpret physical phenomena and both analyse and interpret experiments. We use retrodictive methods to analyze a number of phenomena in quantum optics including the familiar photon antibunching, entanglement and ghost imaging and the perhaps less familiar ideas of quantum scissors, quantum computation in the past a single-particle analysis of two-particle interference. Quantum retrodiction is a quantitative theory and the familiar techniques for evolving quantum states and modelling open systems are applicable to retrodictive problems, but only with the introduction of some novel features. We conclude with a few remarks on more philosophical issues related to the arrow of time and wavefunction "collapse" in the measurement process. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Quantum theory of unambiguous measurements In the present paper I formulate a framework that accommodates many unambiguous discrimination problems. I show that the prior information about any type of constituent (state, channel, or observable) allows us to reformulate the discrimination among finite number of alternatives as the discrimination among finite number of average constituents. Using this framework I solve several unambiguous tasks. I present a solution to optimal unambiguous comparison of two ensembles of unknown quantum states. I consider two cases: 1) The two unknown states are arbitrary pure states of qudits. 2) Alternatively, they are coherent states of single-mode optical fields. For this case I propose simple and optimal experimental setup composed of beam-splitters and a photodetector. As a second tasks I consider an unambiguous identification (UI) of coherent states. In this task identical quantum systems are prepared in coherent states and labeled as unknown and reference states, respectively. The promise is that one reference state is the same as the unknown state and the task is to find out unambiguously which one it is. The particular choice of the reference states is unknown to us, and only the probability distribution describing this choice is known. In a general case when multiple copies of unknown and reference states are available I propose a scheme consisting of beamsplitters and photodetectors that is optimal within linear optics. UI can be considered as a search in a quantum database, whose elements are the reference states and the query is represented by the unknown state. This perspective motivated me to show that reference states can be recovered after the measurement and might be used (with reduced success rate) in subsequent UI. Moreover, I analyze the influence of noise in preparation of coherent states on the performance of the proposed setup. Another problem I address is the unambiguous comparison of a pair of unknown qudit unitary channels. I characterize all solutions and identify the optimal ones. I prove that in optimal experiments for comparison of unitary channels the entanglement is necessary. The last task I studied is the unambiguous comparison of unknown non-degenerate projective measurements. I distinguish between measurement devices with apriori labeled and unlabeled outcomes. In both cases only the difference of the measurements can be concluded unambiguously. For the labeled case I derive the optimal strategy if each unknown measurement is used only once. However, if the apparatuses are not labeled, then each measurement device must be used (at least) twice. In particular, for qubit measurement apparatuses with unlabeled outcomes I derive the optimal test state in the two-shots scenario.
The transformation that an attenuator makes on the state of an optical field is the time reverse of that of an amplifier. Thus predicting the output state for an amplifier is equivalent to retrodicting the input state of an attenuator. We explore the consequences of this equivalence for simple optical quantum communication channels. One counterintuitive consequence is that the mean number of photons sent into an amplifier as retrodicted from a measurement of the number of output photons does not include the contribution of the amplifier noise.