Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory

Rocco Schiavilla

Published Dec 5, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Equivalent derivations of time-dependent pertubation theory; Fermi golden rule; the Born approximation for scattering from Fermi golden rule; survival probability of a state in a time-independent perturbation; positronium in static and oscillating magnetic fields; hydrogen atom in a time-dependent electric field; a model for inelastic scattering of a projectile with a target; semiclassical treatment of the electromagnetic field; ionization of the hydrogen atom by an electromagnetic wave; cross sections for stimulated absorption and emission in hydrogen; spontaneous emission and selection rules with an application to the 2p to 1s transition in hydrogen; theory of the line width; formal scattering theory; S- and T-operators.

DOI
10.1017/9781009473637.019

Related papers

Time-dependent Perturbations and Semi-classical Treatment of Interaction of Field with Matter

A. C. Sharma

How to deal with time-dependent potentials, what kinds of physical problems having time-dependent potentials can be solved exactly and which are to be solved with the use of perturbation theory, what are different possible forms of time-dependent perturbating fields, and semi-classical treatment of the interaction of fields with matter are the subject matters of this chapter. First order perturbation theory, computation of transition probability, transition rates and Fermi's Golden Rule for harmonic and constant perturbations, absorption, stimulated emission and dipole approximation when electromagnetic fields interact with matter, spontaneous emission and Einstein coefficients, and dipole selection rules are other topics which are dealt with in detail in the chapter. Discussions with properly justified mathematical treatment on time-dependent potentials and on the exactly solvable time-dependent two-state systems are the special foci of this chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

Perturbation Theory

Ahmad Amer

This chapter presents approximation methods in quantum mechanics, focusing on both time-independent and time-dependent perturbation theory. The time-independent formulation is developed up to second-order corrections for both nondegenerate and degenerate systems. Applications include the analysis of the Zeeman and Stark effects, where energy level shifts due to magnetic and electric fields are calculated. The time-dependent perturbation theory is introduced, with harmonic perturbations used to derive the first-order transition probabilities and to establish Fermi's golden rule. As an application, the ionization probability of a hydrogen atom under a linearly polarized electromagnetic wave is computed in detail. The treatment is extended to include the case of an unpolarized electromagnetic field. Metadata/Keywords: perturbation theory, Zeeman effect, Stark effect, time-dependent perturbation, harmonic perturbation, Fermi's golden rule, hydrogen ionization

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

Perturbative Methods in Quantum Mechanics

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we review time-independent and time-dependent perturbation theory in quantum mechanics. We begin with Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory for small corrections to the Hamiltonian for non-degenerate and degenerate spectra, which leads us to a discussion of avoided crossings. We then apply these methods to calculate the fine-structure corrections for the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, including the relativistic correction to the kinetic energy, the spin-orbit correction, and the Darwin term. We then turn to the effect of weak constant magnetic fields: for the resulting Zeeman effect we distinguish between the anomalous Zeeman effect and the Paschen-Back effect. In the context of the corresponding Stark effect for electric fields we introduce the Wigner-Eckart theorem and calculate perturbations to first and second order. We then turn to time-independent problems and discuss the Born-von Neumann series for the propagator, time-ordered integrals, the interaction picture, before explaining Fermi’s golden rule.

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Scattering Theory

Donald Gary Swanson

In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.

Taylor & Francis eBooks•Aug 9, 2006•0 citations

Elementary approach to scattering theory

Kurt Haller

Expressions for the time-dependent scattering wave function, S-matrix elements, and the transition rate are derived using simple time-dependent perturbation theory as it is presented in elementary quantum-mechanics texts.

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1984•1 citation

Transitions

Ian R. Kenyon

Abstract A derivation of Fermi’s golden rule is given: this is the interface into which matrix elements from theory can be slotted to provide a prediction testable by experiment. The example of the prediction of the 2p→1s decay in hydrogen is worked through in detail. Selection rules, spectral line shapes (Breit–Wigner and Gaussian) and broadening processes are explained. The formula for the experimental cross-section in terms of the matrix element is produced. The Born approximation is presented and applied to Rutherford scattering. Then the decay rate for allowed β-decays is calculated in Fermi’s model and fitted to the observed rates. Low energy s-wave scattering is analysed in terms of phase shift and scattering length. The example of cold alkali metal atom scattering (≤10−6eV) is treated in preparation for use later with gaseous Bose–Einstein condensates. Ramsauer–Townsend effect explained.

•Sep 10, 2019•0 citations
Equivalent derivations of time-dependent pertubation theory; Fermi golden rule; the Born approximation for scattering from Fermi golden rule; survival probability of a state in a time-independent perturbation; positronium in static and oscillating magnetic fields; hydrogen atom in a time-dependent electric field; a model for inelastic scattering of a projectile with a target; semiclassical treatment of the electromagnetic field; ionization of the hydrogen atom by an electromagnetic wave; cross sections for stimulated absorption and emission in hydrogen; spontaneous emission and selection rules with an application to the 2p to 1s transition in hydrogen; theory of the line width; formal scattering theory; S- and T-operators.
How to deal with time-dependent potentials, what kinds of physical problems having time-dependent potentials can be solved exactly and which are to be solved with the use of perturbation theory, what are different possible forms of time-dependent perturbating fields, and semi-classical treatment of the interaction of fields with matter are the subject matters of this chapter. First order perturbation theory, computation of transition probability, transition rates and Fermi's Golden Rule for harmonic and constant perturbations, absorption, stimulated emission and dipole approximation when electromagnetic fields interact with matter, spontaneous emission and Einstein coefficients, and dipole selection rules are other topics which are dealt with in detail in the chapter. Discussions with properly justified mathematical treatment on time-dependent potentials and on the exactly solvable time-dependent two-state systems are the special foci of this chapter.
This chapter presents approximation methods in quantum mechanics, focusing on both time-independent and time-dependent perturbation theory. The time-independent formulation is developed up to second-order corrections for both nondegenerate and degenerate systems. Applications include the analysis of the Zeeman and Stark effects, where energy level shifts due to magnetic and electric fields are calculated. The time-dependent perturbation theory is introduced, with harmonic perturbations used to derive the first-order transition probabilities and to establish Fermi's golden rule. As an application, the ionization probability of a hydrogen atom under a linearly polarized electromagnetic wave is computed in detail. The treatment is extended to include the case of an unpolarized electromagnetic field. Metadata/Keywords: perturbation theory, Zeeman effect, Stark effect, time-dependent perturbation, harmonic perturbation, Fermi's golden rule, hydrogen ionization
Abstract In this chapter we review time-independent and time-dependent perturbation theory in quantum mechanics. We begin with Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory for small corrections to the Hamiltonian for non-degenerate and degenerate spectra, which leads us to a discussion of avoided crossings. We then apply these methods to calculate the fine-structure corrections for the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, including the relativistic correction to the kinetic energy, the spin-orbit correction, and the Darwin term. We then turn to the effect of weak constant magnetic fields: for the resulting Zeeman effect we distinguish between the anomalous Zeeman effect and the Paschen-Back effect. In the context of the corresponding Stark effect for electric fields we introduce the Wigner-Eckart theorem and calculate perturbations to first and second order. We then turn to time-independent problems and discuss the Born-von Neumann series for the propagator, time-ordered integrals, the interaction picture, before explaining Fermi’s golden rule.
In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.
Abstract A derivation of Fermi’s golden rule is given: this is the interface into which matrix elements from theory can be slotted to provide a prediction testable by experiment. The example of the prediction of the 2p→1s decay in hydrogen is worked through in detail. Selection rules, spectral line shapes (Breit–Wigner and Gaussian) and broadening processes are explained. The formula for the experimental cross-section in terms of the matrix element is produced. The Born approximation is presented and applied to Rutherford scattering. Then the decay rate for allowed β-decays is calculated in Fermi’s model and fitted to the observed rates. Low energy s-wave scattering is analysed in terms of phase shift and scattering length. The example of cold alkali metal atom scattering (≤10−6eV) is treated in preparation for use later with gaseous Bose–Einstein condensates. Ramsauer–Townsend effect explained.