Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Analysis and Mechanics

Hybrid quantum-classical control problems

Emanuel-Cristian Boghiu, Jesús Clemente-Gallardo, Jorge Alberto Jover-Galtier, David Martínez-Crespo

Published Jan 1, 2024• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The notion of hybrid quantum-classical control system was introduced as a control dynamical system which combined classical and quantum degrees of freedom. Classical and quantum objects were combined within a geometrical description of both types of systems. We also considered the notion of hybrid quantum-classical controllability by means of the usual definitions of geometric control theory, and we discussed how the different concepts associated to quantum controllability are lost in the hybrid context because of the nonlinearity of the dynamics. We also considered several examples of physically relevant problems, such as the spin-boson model or the notion of hybrid spline.

DOI
10.3934/cam.2024034

Related papers

Linear dynamics of quantum-classical hybrids

Hans-Thomas Elze

A formulation of quantum-classical hybrid dynamics is presented which concerns the direct coupling of classical and quantum mechanical degrees of freedom. It is of interest for applications in quantum mechanical approximation schemes and may be relevant for the foundations of quantum mechanics, in particular, when it comes to experiments exploring the quantum-classical border. The present linear theory differs from the nonlinear ensemble theory of Hall and Reginatto but shares with it the fulfillment of all consistency requirements discussed in the literature, while earlier attempts have failed in this respect. Our work is based on the representation of quantum mechanics in the framework of classical analytical mechanics by A. Heslot, showing that notions of states in phase space, observables, Poisson brackets, and related canonical transformations can be naturally extended to quantum mechanics. This is suitably generalized for quantum-classical hybrids here.

arXiv:1111.2276•Physical Review A•May 11, 2012•124 citations

Quantum-classical hybrid dynamics - a summary

Hans-Thomas Elze

A summary of a recently proposed description of quantum-classical hybrids is presented, which concerns quantum and classical degrees of freedom of a composite object that interact directly with each other. This is based on notions of classical Hamiltonian mechanics suitably extended to quantum mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2013•17 citations

Quantum-classical hybrid dynamics – a summary

Hans-Thomas Elze

A summary of a recently proposed description of quantum-classical hybrids is presented, which concerns quantum and classical degrees of freedom of a composite object that interact directly with each other. This is based on notions of classical Hamiltonian mechanics suitably extended to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1306.4480•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 10, 2013•17 citations

Four questions for quantum-classical hybrid theory

Hans-Thomas Elze

Four questions are discussed which may be addressed to any proposal of a quantum-classical hybrid theory which concerns the direct coupling of classical and quantum mechanical degrees of freedom. In particular, we consider the formulation of hybrid dynamics presented recently in Ref. [1]. This linear theory differs from the nonlinear ensemble theory of Hall and Reginatto, but shares with it to fulfil all consistency requirements discussed in the literature, while earlier attempts failed. - Here, we additionally ask: Does the theory allow for superposition, separable, and entangled states originating in the quantum mechanical sector? Does it allow for "Free Will", as introduced, in this context, by Diósi [2]? Is it local? Does it provide hints for the emergence of quantum mechanics from dynamics beneath?

arXiv:1202.3448•Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 10, 2012•23 citations

Hybrid classical-quantum formulations ask for hybrid notions

Carlos Barceló, Raúl Carballo-Rubio, Luis J. Garay +1 more

We reappraise some of the hybrid classical-quantum models proposed in the literature with the goal of retrieving some of their common characteristics. In particular, first, we analyze in detail the Peres-Terno argument regarding the inconsistency of hybrid quantizations of the Sudarshan type. We show that to accept such hybrid formalism entails the necessity of dealing with additional degrees of freedom beyond those in the straight complete quantization of the system. Second, we recover a similar enlargement of degrees of freedom in the so-called statistical hybrid models. Finally, we use Wigner's quantization of a simple model to illustrate how in hybrid systems the subsystems are never purely classical or quantum. A certain degree of quantumness (classicality) is being exchanged between the different sectors of the theory, which in this particular unphysical toy model makes them undistinguishable.

arXiv:1206.7036•Physical Review A•Oct 22, 2012•52 citations

Hybrid quantum-classical model of quantum measurements

Nikola Burić, Duska B Popovic, Milan Radonjić +1 more

Two types of Hamiltonian hybrid quantum-classical theories are considered as potential models of the quantum measurement process. The two theories have the same Hamiltonian dynamics but differ in the association of states of the quantum system with states of the hybrid model. In the first type of association pure quantum states are modeled by pure states of the hybrid, while in the second type the pure quantum states are modeled by statistical mixtures of the hybrid pure states. It is shown that the second of the two theories describes correctly the quantum measurement while the first provides only an averaged description.

Physical Review A•May 31, 2013•8 citations
The notion of hybrid quantum-classical control system was introduced as a control dynamical system which combined classical and quantum degrees of freedom. Classical and quantum objects were combined within a geometrical description of both types of systems. We also considered the notion of hybrid quantum-classical controllability by means of the usual definitions of geometric control theory, and we discussed how the different concepts associated to quantum controllability are lost in the hybrid context because of the nonlinearity of the dynamics. We also considered several examples of physically relevant problems, such as the spin-boson model or the notion of hybrid spline.
A formulation of quantum-classical hybrid dynamics is presented which concerns the direct coupling of classical and quantum mechanical degrees of freedom. It is of interest for applications in quantum mechanical approximation schemes and may be relevant for the foundations of quantum mechanics, in particular, when it comes to experiments exploring the quantum-classical border. The present linear theory differs from the nonlinear ensemble theory of Hall and Reginatto but shares with it the fulfillment of all consistency requirements discussed in the literature, while earlier attempts have failed in this respect. Our work is based on the representation of quantum mechanics in the framework of classical analytical mechanics by A. Heslot, showing that notions of states in phase space, observables, Poisson brackets, and related canonical transformations can be naturally extended to quantum mechanics. This is suitably generalized for quantum-classical hybrids here.
Four questions are discussed which may be addressed to any proposal of a quantum-classical hybrid theory which concerns the direct coupling of classical and quantum mechanical degrees of freedom. In particular, we consider the formulation of hybrid dynamics presented recently in Ref. [1]. This linear theory differs from the nonlinear ensemble theory of Hall and Reginatto, but shares with it to fulfil all consistency requirements discussed in the literature, while earlier attempts failed. - Here, we additionally ask: Does the theory allow for superposition, separable, and entangled states originating in the quantum mechanical sector? Does it allow for "Free Will", as introduced, in this context, by Diósi [2]? Is it local? Does it provide hints for the emergence of quantum mechanics from dynamics beneath?
We reappraise some of the hybrid classical-quantum models proposed in the literature with the goal of retrieving some of their common characteristics. In particular, first, we analyze in detail the Peres-Terno argument regarding the inconsistency of hybrid quantizations of the Sudarshan type. We show that to accept such hybrid formalism entails the necessity of dealing with additional degrees of freedom beyond those in the straight complete quantization of the system. Second, we recover a similar enlargement of degrees of freedom in the so-called statistical hybrid models. Finally, we use Wigner's quantization of a simple model to illustrate how in hybrid systems the subsystems are never purely classical or quantum. A certain degree of quantumness (classicality) is being exchanged between the different sectors of the theory, which in this particular unphysical toy model makes them undistinguishable.
Two types of Hamiltonian hybrid quantum-classical theories are considered as potential models of the quantum measurement process. The two theories have the same Hamiltonian dynamics but differ in the association of states of the quantum system with states of the hybrid model. In the first type of association pure quantum states are modeled by pure states of the hybrid, while in the second type the pure quantum states are modeled by statistical mixtures of the hybrid pure states. It is shown that the second of the two theories describes correctly the quantum measurement while the first provides only an averaged description.