Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Journal of Chemical Physics

Combining the generalized quantum master equation approach with quasiclassical mapping Hamiltonian methods to simulate the dynamics of electronic coherences

Yudan Liu, Ellen Mulvihill, Eitan Geva

Published Oct 22, 2024• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) approach provides a powerful general-purpose framework for simulating the inherently quantum mechanical dynamics of a subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements of interest in complex molecular systems. Previous studies have found that combining the GQME approach with quasiclassical mapping Hamiltonian (QC/MH) methods can dramatically improve the accuracy of electronic populations obtained via those methods. In this paper, we perform a complimentary study of the advantages offered by the GQME approach for simulating the dynamics of electronic coherences, which play a central role in optical spectroscopy, quantum information science, and quantum technology. To this end, we focus on cases where the electronic coherences predicted for the spin-boson benchmark model by direct application of various QC/MH methods are inaccurate. We find that similar to the case of electronic populations, combining the QC/MH methods with the GQME approach can dramatically improve the accuracy of the electronic coherences obtained via those methods. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of how the performance of GQMEs depends on the choice of projection operator and electronic basis and show that the accuracy and feasibility of the GQME approach can benefit from casting the GQME in terms of the eigen-basis of the observable of interest.

DOI
10.1063/5.0232462

Related papers

Simulating the dynamics of electronic observables via reduced-dimensionality generalized quantum master equations

Ellen Mulvihill, Eitan Geva

We describe a general-purpose framework for formulating the dynamics of any subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements in terms of a formally exact generalized quantum master equation (GQME). Within this framework, the effect of coupling to the nuclear degrees of freedom, as well as to any projected-out electronic reduced density matrix elements, is captured by a memory kernel and an inhomogeneous term, whose dimensionalities are dictated by the number of electronic reduced density matrix elements included in the subset of interest. We show that the memory kernel and inhomogeneous term within such GQMEs can be calculated from projection-free inputs of the same dimensionality, which can be cast in terms of the corresponding subsets of overall system two-time correlation functions. The applicability and feasibility of such reduced-dimensionality GQMEs is demonstrated on the two-state spin-boson benchmark model. To this end, we compare and contrast the following four types of GQMEs: (1) a full density matrix GQME, (2) a single-population scalar GQME, (3) a populations-only GQME, and (4) a subset GQME for any combination of populations and coherences. Using a method based on the mapping Hamiltonian approach and linearized semiclassical approximation to calculate the projection-free inputs, we find that while single-population GQMEs and subset GQMEs containing only one population are less accurate, they can still produce reasonable results and that the accuracy of the results obtained via the populations-only GQME and a subset GQME containing both populations is comparable to that obtained via the full density matrix GQMEs.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 11, 2022•20 citations

Quasiclassical approaches to the generalized quantum master equation

Graziano Amati, Maximilian A. C. Saller, Aaron Kelly +1 more

The formalism of the generalized quantum master equation (GQME) is an effective tool to simultaneously increase the accuracy and the efficiency of quasiclassical trajectory methods in the simulation of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics. The GQME expresses correlation functions in terms of a non-Markovian equation of motion, involving memory kernels that are typically fast-decaying and can therefore be computed by short-time quasiclassical trajectories. In this paper, we study the approximate solution of the GQME, obtained by calculating the kernels with two methods: Ehrenfest mean-field theory and spin-mapping. We test the approaches on a range of spin-boson models with increasing energy bias between the two electronic levels and place a particular focus on the long-time limits of the populations. We find that the accuracy of the predictions of the GQME depends strongly on the specific technique used to calculate the kernels. In particular, spin-mapping outperforms Ehrenfest for all the systems studied. The problem of unphysical negative electronic populations affecting spin-mapping is resolved by coupling the method with the master equation. Conversely, Ehrenfest in conjunction with the GQME can predict negative populations, despite the fact that the populations calculated from direct dynamics are positive definite.

arXiv:2209.01076•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 28, 2022•24 citations

Combining the mapping Hamiltonian linearized semiclassical approach with the generalized quantum master equation to simulate electronically nonadiabatic molecular dynamics

Ellen Mulvihill, Xing Bao Gao, Yudan Liu +3 more

The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) provides a powerful framework for simulating electronically nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. Within this framework, the effect of the nuclear degrees of freedom on the time evolution of the electronic reduced density matrix is fully captured by a memory kernel superoperator. In this paper, we consider two different procedures for calculating the memory kernel of the GQME from projection-free inputs obtained via the combination of the mapping Hamiltonian (MH) approach and the linearized semiclassical (LSC) approximation. The accuracy and feasibility of the two procedures are demonstrated on the spin-boson model. We find that although simulating the electronic dynamics by direct application of the two LSC-based procedures leads to qualitatively different results that become increasingly less accurate with increasing time, restricting their use to calculating the memory kernel leads to an accurate description of the electronic dynamics. Comparison with a previously proposed procedure for calculating the memory kernel via the Ehrenfest method reveals that MH/LSC methods produce memory kernels that are better behaved at long times and lead to more accurate electronic dynamics.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Aug 15, 2019•51 citations

Generalized quantum master equations in and out of equilibrium: When can one win?

Aaron Kelly, Andrés Montoya−Castillo, Lu Wang +1 more

Generalized quantum master equations (GQMEs) are an important tool in modeling chemical and physical processes. For a large number of problems, it has been shown that exact and approximate quantum dynamics methods can be made dramatically more efficient, and in the latter case more accurate, by proceeding via the GQME formalism. However, there are many situations where utilizing the GQME approach with an approximate method has been observed to return the same dynamics as using that method directly. Here, for systems both in and out of equilibrium, we provide a more detailed understanding of the conditions under which using an approximate method can yield benefits when combined with the GQME formalism. In particular, we demonstrate the necessary manipulations, which are satisfied by exact quantum dynamics, that are required to recast the memory kernel in a form that can be analytically shown to yield the same result as a direct application of the dynamics regardless of the approximation used. By considering the connections between these forms of the kernel, we derive the conditions that approximate methods must satisfy if they are to offer different results when used in conjunction with the GQME formalism. These analytical results thus provide new insights as to when proceeding via the GQME approach can be used to improve the accuracy of simulations.

arXiv:1603.01905•The Journal of Chemical Physics•May 10, 2016•84 citations

A modified approach for simulating electronically nonadiabatic dynamics via the generalized quantum master equation

Ellen Mulvihill, Alexander Schubert, Xiang Sun +2 more

We present a modified approach for simulating electronically nonadiabatic dynamics based on the Nakajima-Zwanzig generalized quantum master equation (GQME). The modified approach utilizes the fact that the Nakajima-Zwanzig formalism does not require casting the overall Hamiltonian in system-bath form, which is arguably neither natural nor convenient in the case of the Hamiltonian that governs nonadiabatic dynamics. Within the modified approach, the effect of the nuclear degrees of freedom on the time evolution of the electronic reduced density operator is fully captured by a memory kernel super-operator. A methodology for calculating the memory kernel from projection-free inputs is developed. Simulating the electronic dynamics via the modified approach, with a memory kernel obtained using exact or approximate methods, can be more cost effective and/or lead to more accurate results than direct application of those methods. The modified approach is compared to previously proposed GQME-based approaches, and its robustness and accuracy are demonstrated on a benchmark spin-boson model with a memory kernel which is calculated within the Ehrenfest method.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 16, 2019•58 citations

Tensor-Train Thermo-Field Memory Kernels for Generalized Quantum Master Equations

Ningyi Lyu, Ellen Mulvihill, Micheline B. Soley +2 more

The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) approach provides a rigorous framework for deriving the exact equation of motion for any subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements (e.g., the diagonal elements). In the context of electronic dynamics, the memory kernel and inhomogeneous term of the GQME introduce the implicit coupling to nuclear motion and dynamics of electronic density matrix elements that are projected out (e.g., the off-diagonal elements), allowing for efficient quantum dynamics simulations. Here, we focus on benchmark quantum simulations of electronic dynamics in a spin-boson model system described by various types of GQMEs. Exact memory kernels and inhomogeneous terms are obtained from short-time quantum-mechanically exact tensor-train thermo-field dynamics (TT-TFD) simulations and are compared with those obtained from an approximate linearized semiclassical method, allowing for assessment of the accuracy of these approximate memory kernels and inhomogeneous terms. Moreover, we have analyzed the computational cost of the full and reduced-dimensionality GQMEs. The scaling of the computational cost is dependent on several factors, sometimes with opposite scaling trends. The TT-TFD memory kernels can provide insights on the main sources of inaccuracies of GQME approaches when combined with approximate input methods and pave the road for the development of quantum circuits that implement GQMEs on digital quantum computers.

arXiv:2208.14273•Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation•Jan 31, 2023•43 citations
The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) approach provides a powerful general-purpose framework for simulating the inherently quantum mechanical dynamics of a subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements of interest in complex molecular systems. Previous studies have found that combining the GQME approach with quasiclassical mapping Hamiltonian (QC/MH) methods can dramatically improve the accuracy of electronic populations obtained via those methods. In this paper, we perform a complimentary study of the advantages offered by the GQME approach for simulating the dynamics of electronic coherences, which play a central role in optical spectroscopy, quantum information science, and quantum technology. To this end, we focus on cases where the electronic coherences predicted for the spin-boson benchmark model by direct application of various QC/MH methods are inaccurate. We find that similar to the case of electronic populations, combining the QC/MH methods with the GQME approach can dramatically improve the accuracy of the electronic coherences obtained via those methods. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of how the performance of GQMEs depends on the choice of projection operator and electronic basis and show that the accuracy and feasibility of the GQME approach can benefit from casting the GQME in terms of the eigen-basis of the observable of interest.
We describe a general-purpose framework for formulating the dynamics of any subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements in terms of a formally exact generalized quantum master equation (GQME). Within this framework, the effect of coupling to the nuclear degrees of freedom, as well as to any projected-out electronic reduced density matrix elements, is captured by a memory kernel and an inhomogeneous term, whose dimensionalities are dictated by the number of electronic reduced density matrix elements included in the subset of interest. We show that the memory kernel and inhomogeneous term within such GQMEs can be calculated from projection-free inputs of the same dimensionality, which can be cast in terms of the corresponding subsets of overall system two-time correlation functions. The applicability and feasibility of such reduced-dimensionality GQMEs is demonstrated on the two-state spin-boson benchmark model. To this end, we compare and contrast the following four types of GQMEs: (1) a full density matrix GQME, (2) a single-population scalar GQME, (3) a populations-only GQME, and (4) a subset GQME for any combination of populations and coherences. Using a method based on the mapping Hamiltonian approach and linearized semiclassical approximation to calculate the projection-free inputs, we find that while single-population GQMEs and subset GQMEs containing only one population are less accurate, they can still produce reasonable results and that the accuracy of the results obtained via the populations-only GQME and a subset GQME containing both populations is comparable to that obtained via the full density matrix GQMEs.
The formalism of the generalized quantum master equation (GQME) is an effective tool to simultaneously increase the accuracy and the efficiency of quasiclassical trajectory methods in the simulation of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics. The GQME expresses correlation functions in terms of a non-Markovian equation of motion, involving memory kernels that are typically fast-decaying and can therefore be computed by short-time quasiclassical trajectories. In this paper, we study the approximate solution of the GQME, obtained by calculating the kernels with two methods: Ehrenfest mean-field theory and spin-mapping. We test the approaches on a range of spin-boson models with increasing energy bias between the two electronic levels and place a particular focus on the long-time limits of the populations. We find that the accuracy of the predictions of the GQME depends strongly on the specific technique used to calculate the kernels. In particular, spin-mapping outperforms Ehrenfest for all the systems studied. The problem of unphysical negative electronic populations affecting spin-mapping is resolved by coupling the method with the master equation. Conversely, Ehrenfest in conjunction with the GQME can predict negative populations, despite the fact that the populations calculated from direct dynamics are positive definite.
The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) provides a powerful framework for simulating electronically nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. Within this framework, the effect of the nuclear degrees of freedom on the time evolution of the electronic reduced density matrix is fully captured by a memory kernel superoperator. In this paper, we consider two different procedures for calculating the memory kernel of the GQME from projection-free inputs obtained via the combination of the mapping Hamiltonian (MH) approach and the linearized semiclassical (LSC) approximation. The accuracy and feasibility of the two procedures are demonstrated on the spin-boson model. We find that although simulating the electronic dynamics by direct application of the two LSC-based procedures leads to qualitatively different results that become increasingly less accurate with increasing time, restricting their use to calculating the memory kernel leads to an accurate description of the electronic dynamics. Comparison with a previously proposed procedure for calculating the memory kernel via the Ehrenfest method reveals that MH/LSC methods produce memory kernels that are better behaved at long times and lead to more accurate electronic dynamics.
Generalized quantum master equations (GQMEs) are an important tool in modeling chemical and physical processes. For a large number of problems, it has been shown that exact and approximate quantum dynamics methods can be made dramatically more efficient, and in the latter case more accurate, by proceeding via the GQME formalism. However, there are many situations where utilizing the GQME approach with an approximate method has been observed to return the same dynamics as using that method directly. Here, for systems both in and out of equilibrium, we provide a more detailed understanding of the conditions under which using an approximate method can yield benefits when combined with the GQME formalism. In particular, we demonstrate the necessary manipulations, which are satisfied by exact quantum dynamics, that are required to recast the memory kernel in a form that can be analytically shown to yield the same result as a direct application of the dynamics regardless of the approximation used. By considering the connections between these forms of the kernel, we derive the conditions that approximate methods must satisfy if they are to offer different results when used in conjunction with the GQME formalism. These analytical results thus provide new insights as to when proceeding via the GQME approach can be used to improve the accuracy of simulations.
We present a modified approach for simulating electronically nonadiabatic dynamics based on the Nakajima-Zwanzig generalized quantum master equation (GQME). The modified approach utilizes the fact that the Nakajima-Zwanzig formalism does not require casting the overall Hamiltonian in system-bath form, which is arguably neither natural nor convenient in the case of the Hamiltonian that governs nonadiabatic dynamics. Within the modified approach, the effect of the nuclear degrees of freedom on the time evolution of the electronic reduced density operator is fully captured by a memory kernel super-operator. A methodology for calculating the memory kernel from projection-free inputs is developed. Simulating the electronic dynamics via the modified approach, with a memory kernel obtained using exact or approximate methods, can be more cost effective and/or lead to more accurate results than direct application of those methods. The modified approach is compared to previously proposed GQME-based approaches, and its robustness and accuracy are demonstrated on a benchmark spin-boson model with a memory kernel which is calculated within the Ehrenfest method.
The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) approach provides a rigorous framework for deriving the exact equation of motion for any subset of electronic reduced density matrix elements (e.g., the diagonal elements). In the context of electronic dynamics, the memory kernel and inhomogeneous term of the GQME introduce the implicit coupling to nuclear motion and dynamics of electronic density matrix elements that are projected out (e.g., the off-diagonal elements), allowing for efficient quantum dynamics simulations. Here, we focus on benchmark quantum simulations of electronic dynamics in a spin-boson model system described by various types of GQMEs. Exact memory kernels and inhomogeneous terms are obtained from short-time quantum-mechanically exact tensor-train thermo-field dynamics (TT-TFD) simulations and are compared with those obtained from an approximate linearized semiclassical method, allowing for assessment of the accuracy of these approximate memory kernels and inhomogeneous terms. Moreover, we have analyzed the computational cost of the full and reduced-dimensionality GQMEs. The scaling of the computational cost is dependent on several factors, sometimes with opposite scaling trends. The TT-TFD memory kernels can provide insights on the main sources of inaccuracies of GQME approaches when combined with approximate input methods and pave the road for the development of quantum circuits that implement GQMEs on digital quantum computers.