Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Region - Educational Research and Reviews

Hilbert space in quantum mechanics

Wenbing MENG, Pan Zhou

Published Jul 10, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum mechanics is often considered as a relatively obscure physics course, which not only subverts beginners' cognition for Newton's motion laws in classical mechanics but also makes learners afraid, because of its complicated and profound mathematical theories in quantum mechanics. Thus, this article will, from the perspective of quantum mechanics, discuss the fundamental differences between the connotation of Hilbert space and spaces in classical mechanics. The application of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics will be expounded then. Finally, based on learners' difficulties existing in learning process, several teaching suggestions will be presented for future teaching reference.

DOI
10.32629/rerr.v6i7.2344

Related papers

ОТЛИЧИЯ КЛАССИЧЕСКОЙ И КВАНТОВОЙ МЕХАНИКИ

Айғаным Мұратқызы Сейітова, Қымбат Ермекқызы Бектемір

This article analyzes the fundamental differences between classical and quantum mechanics from a scientific and theoretical perspective. By comparing the historical development of two physical paradigms, their mathematical frameworks, laws, and areas of application, the study explores their role in explaining natural phenomena. Classical mechanics is based on causal determinism, continuity, and the precise trajectory of motion, whereas quantum mechanics employs concepts of probability, discreteness, and the wave function. To highlight the differences between the theories, key physical laws such as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, the Schrödinger equation, and Newton’s laws are compared. The article also discusses the modern interpretation of mechanics in the era of quantum technologies.

«Qazaq Journal of Young Scientist» халықаралық ғылыми журналы•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations

Teaching Study of Basic Conception in Quantum Physics

Hu Xing

Quantum physics and classical physics are two of important parts in the integrated physics.They differs in studying fields and researching methods,but both respectively play the very important role in propelling the society forward and improving people's understanding of the physical world.Quantum physics describes the laws of motion in microscopic field,which needs us to face the new mathematical tools,new modes of thinking and many new conceptions different from the traditional classical physics.Only by grasping the key contents,starting with the basic conceptions and understanding deeply the physical connotation can we acquire the desired teaching effects with saved efforts.

Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Analysis Hilbert space in quantum mechanics

Liwei Liu

For the purpose of making abstract Hilbert spaces easily comprehensible,represents comparison between N-dimension vector space and quantum mechanics Hilbert space,from space composing and space variable calculation to space coordinate transformation and so on. A conclusion that two spaces are comparable can be drawn.Various calculation of Hilbert space composed of wave function is easily comprehensible and grasped.

Journal of Science of Teachers' College and University•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

The seven laws of Quantum Mechanics : banishing the bogeys

Urjit A. Yajnik

The laws of quantum mechanics are couched in subtle mathematical language. The laws are not usually stated in a compact pedagogical form. Here I present a possible way to correct this. Essential facts can be distilled into seven statements that are easy to remember and easily referred back. Also, the current teaching of quantum mechanics is laden with words of negative connotations, originating as they did during the early decades of the subject when the subject was intellectually still puzzling. A wide variety of experiments in the intervening decades, not least those that were awarded the Nobel Prize of 2022 amply affirm the validity and substantial ``reality'' of Quantum Mechanics as a theory. I take a few of the inadequacies of classical framework to illustrate that some of the complaints against Quantum Mechanics are patently misplaced. Finally I discuss the bogeys such as ``wave article duality'', ``uncertainty'', ``indistinguishability'' ``statistics'' and ``entanglement'' and advocate adopting better terminology to save new learners from the old biases.

arXiv:2301.05436•Jan 13, 2023•0 citations

Quantum mechanics for natural philosophers (II)

Peter Gibbins

Quantum mechanics comes in a variety of different forms and formalisms. There is wave mechanics, matrix mechanics, Dirac's version of quantum mechanics, von Neumann's version of quantum mechanics. The philosopher of physics has to ask not only what quantum mechanics means, but also what it is. Orthodoxy in the philosophy of physics treats quantum mechanics as the general theory of microphysics which takes Hilbert space as its state space and which associates observables with certain special operators on that space. This amounts to a decision as to what quantum mechanics is. However it is a far from arbitrary decision. For the Hilbert space, or von Neumann, formalism summarizes and captures everything that is in the other versions of quantum mechanics, without any of the dubious mathematics of, for example, Dirac's version. Contemporary philosophers of physics take a very formal view of what quantum mechanics is, a view which has many advantages and some disadvantages. Whatever the disadvantages of focussing on the formalism of quantum mechanics - and it may lead to losing sight of the ‘physics' and possibly to a bias against Bohrian Copenhagenism - it is certainly true that the literate philosopher of physics must have some acquaintance with Hilbert space. There are in fact several topics we have to deal with, though we deal with them only very cursorily. (This chapter is no substitute for Jauch's classic text Foundations of Quantum Mechanics .)

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 25, 1987•0 citations

Kvanttifysiikan opetuksen haasteet : käsitteellisiä, historiallisia ja opetuksellisia näkökohtia

Elina Palmgren

Recent years have seen increased interest towards quantum physics education research, and the topic has been studied from many perspectives both empirically and theoretically. The consensus of previous studies has been that the theory poses an exceptional challenge for learning and teaching, warranting more attention and further research. This dissertation aims to contribute to this discussion by asking what the underlying reasons for these challenges are and how they could potentially be alleviated. On one hand, the topic is approached from an interpretational point of view, considering the ontological foundations of the theory. It is argued that many of the fundamental difficulties in learning and teaching quantum mechanics stem from the ontological foundations of the theory. On the other hand, the historical development and the mathematical structure of the theory are discussed from an educational point of view. The dissertation consists of five articles that explore the above themes from different perspectives. The first study considers the development of one historical formulation of quantum mechanics, namely matrix mechanics. In general, the historical development of quantum theory has been complex and meandering, and its results may seem confusing to students. In our study, we discuss the use of matrix mechanics in quantum mechanics instruction to provide students with a clearer picture of the theory, its historical development, and the relations between its various formulations and used formalisms. The second and third studies add to the discussion on the roles of mathematics in physics and physics education. In quantum mechanics, the role of mathematics is especially pronounced, as the understanding of the theory heavily relies on its mathematical framework. Therefore, we argue that the focus of quantum mechanics instruction should be shifted away from calculational aspects to a more integrated approach that treats the conceptual and mathematical sides of the theory intertwined. In our studies, we provide an overview of the roles assigned to mathematics in previous physics education research literature and present our own layered characterisation of the roles, aiming at diversifying the discussion on the roles of mathematics within the physics education research community and in physics instruction. The fourth and fifth studies empirically examine the challenges of quantum mechanics instruction in the context of an introductory quantum mechanics course. In the fourth study, we explore the effect of initial mathematics knowledge and self-efficacy on student learning, while in the fifth study, we consider the effects of the instructional approach and different teaching strategies on student conceptual knowledge and self-efficacy. The specific focus is on the impact of implementing a new instructional approach, the so-called spin first approach, that emphasises the mathematical basis and conceptual understanding of the theory instead of repeated mathematical calculations. Our results show that the spin-first approach, combined with an active learning model, is able to foster a high level of student self-efficacy and conceptual learning. Quantum mechanics is one of the most successful theories in the history of physics. Nevertheless, learning and teaching its basic principles continue to pose significant challenges for both instructors and students. In this dissertation, we argue for an approach to teaching the theory that places greater emphasis on its mathematical foundations and treats physics and mathematics as intertwined disciplines.

Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja•Oct 2, 2025•0 citations
Quantum mechanics is often considered as a relatively obscure physics course, which not only subverts beginners' cognition for Newton's motion laws in classical mechanics but also makes learners afraid, because of its complicated and profound mathematical theories in quantum mechanics. Thus, this article will, from the perspective of quantum mechanics, discuss the fundamental differences between the connotation of Hilbert space and spaces in classical mechanics. The application of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics will be expounded then. Finally, based on learners' difficulties existing in learning process, several teaching suggestions will be presented for future teaching reference.
This article analyzes the fundamental differences between classical and quantum mechanics from a scientific and theoretical perspective. By comparing the historical development of two physical paradigms, their mathematical frameworks, laws, and areas of application, the study explores their role in explaining natural phenomena. Classical mechanics is based on causal determinism, continuity, and the precise trajectory of motion, whereas quantum mechanics employs concepts of probability, discreteness, and the wave function. To highlight the differences between the theories, key physical laws such as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, the Schrödinger equation, and Newton’s laws are compared. The article also discusses the modern interpretation of mechanics in the era of quantum technologies.
Quantum physics and classical physics are two of important parts in the integrated physics.They differs in studying fields and researching methods,but both respectively play the very important role in propelling the society forward and improving people's understanding of the physical world.Quantum physics describes the laws of motion in microscopic field,which needs us to face the new mathematical tools,new modes of thinking and many new conceptions different from the traditional classical physics.Only by grasping the key contents,starting with the basic conceptions and understanding deeply the physical connotation can we acquire the desired teaching effects with saved efforts.
The laws of quantum mechanics are couched in subtle mathematical language. The laws are not usually stated in a compact pedagogical form. Here I present a possible way to correct this. Essential facts can be distilled into seven statements that are easy to remember and easily referred back. Also, the current teaching of quantum mechanics is laden with words of negative connotations, originating as they did during the early decades of the subject when the subject was intellectually still puzzling. A wide variety of experiments in the intervening decades, not least those that were awarded the Nobel Prize of 2022 amply affirm the validity and substantial ``reality'' of Quantum Mechanics as a theory. I take a few of the inadequacies of classical framework to illustrate that some of the complaints against Quantum Mechanics are patently misplaced. Finally I discuss the bogeys such as ``wave article duality'', ``uncertainty'', ``indistinguishability'' ``statistics'' and ``entanglement'' and advocate adopting better terminology to save new learners from the old biases.
Quantum mechanics comes in a variety of different forms and formalisms. There is wave mechanics, matrix mechanics, Dirac's version of quantum mechanics, von Neumann's version of quantum mechanics. The philosopher of physics has to ask not only what quantum mechanics means, but also what it is. Orthodoxy in the philosophy of physics treats quantum mechanics as the general theory of microphysics which takes Hilbert space as its state space and which associates observables with certain special operators on that space. This amounts to a decision as to what quantum mechanics is. However it is a far from arbitrary decision. For the Hilbert space, or von Neumann, formalism summarizes and captures everything that is in the other versions of quantum mechanics, without any of the dubious mathematics of, for example, Dirac's version. Contemporary philosophers of physics take a very formal view of what quantum mechanics is, a view which has many advantages and some disadvantages. Whatever the disadvantages of focussing on the formalism of quantum mechanics - and it may lead to losing sight of the ‘physics' and possibly to a bias against Bohrian Copenhagenism - it is certainly true that the literate philosopher of physics must have some acquaintance with Hilbert space. There are in fact several topics we have to deal with, though we deal with them only very cursorily. (This chapter is no substitute for Jauch's classic text Foundations of Quantum Mechanics .)
Recent years have seen increased interest towards quantum physics education research, and the topic has been studied from many perspectives both empirically and theoretically. The consensus of previous studies has been that the theory poses an exceptional challenge for learning and teaching, warranting more attention and further research. This dissertation aims to contribute to this discussion by asking what the underlying reasons for these challenges are and how they could potentially be alleviated. On one hand, the topic is approached from an interpretational point of view, considering the ontological foundations of the theory. It is argued that many of the fundamental difficulties in learning and teaching quantum mechanics stem from the ontological foundations of the theory. On the other hand, the historical development and the mathematical structure of the theory are discussed from an educational point of view. The dissertation consists of five articles that explore the above themes from different perspectives. The first study considers the development of one historical formulation of quantum mechanics, namely matrix mechanics. In general, the historical development of quantum theory has been complex and meandering, and its results may seem confusing to students. In our study, we discuss the use of matrix mechanics in quantum mechanics instruction to provide students with a clearer picture of the theory, its historical development, and the relations between its various formulations and used formalisms. The second and third studies add to the discussion on the roles of mathematics in physics and physics education. In quantum mechanics, the role of mathematics is especially pronounced, as the understanding of the theory heavily relies on its mathematical framework. Therefore, we argue that the focus of quantum mechanics instruction should be shifted away from calculational aspects to a more integrated approach that treats the conceptual and mathematical sides of the theory intertwined. In our studies, we provide an overview of the roles assigned to mathematics in previous physics education research literature and present our own layered characterisation of the roles, aiming at diversifying the discussion on the roles of mathematics within the physics education research community and in physics instruction. The fourth and fifth studies empirically examine the challenges of quantum mechanics instruction in the context of an introductory quantum mechanics course. In the fourth study, we explore the effect of initial mathematics knowledge and self-efficacy on student learning, while in the fifth study, we consider the effects of the instructional approach and different teaching strategies on student conceptual knowledge and self-efficacy. The specific focus is on the impact of implementing a new instructional approach, the so-called spin first approach, that emphasises the mathematical basis and conceptual understanding of the theory instead of repeated mathematical calculations. Our results show that the spin-first approach, combined with an active learning model, is able to foster a high level of student self-efficacy and conceptual learning. Quantum mechanics is one of the most successful theories in the history of physics. Nevertheless, learning and teaching its basic principles continue to pose significant challenges for both instructors and students. In this dissertation, we argue for an approach to teaching the theory that places greater emphasis on its mathematical foundations and treats physics and mathematics as intertwined disciplines.