Single Input Functionality (SIF) is a special case of MPC, where only one distinguished party called dealer holds the secret input. SIF allows the dealer to complete a computation task and send to other parties their respective outputs without revealing any additional information about its secret input. SIF has many applications, including multiple-verifier zero-knowledge and verifiable relation sharing, etc. Recently, several works devote to round-efficient realization of SIF, and achieve 2-round communication in the honest majority setting (Applebaum et al., Crypto 2022; Baum et al., CCS 2022; Yang and Wang, Asiacrypt 2022). In this work, we focus on concrete efficiency and propose the first practical construction for SIF against a dishonest majority in the preprocessing model; moreover, the online phase of our protocol is only 2-round and is highly efficient, as it requires no cryptographic operations and achieves information theoretical security. For SIF among 5 parties, our scheme takes 152.34ms (total) to evaluate an AES-128 circuit with 7.36ms online time. Compared to the state-of-the-art (honest majority) solution (Baum et al., CCS 2022), our protocol is roughly 2 × faster in the online phase, although more preprocessing time is needed. Compared to the state-of-the-art generic MPC against a dishonest majority (Wang et al., CCS 2017; Cramer et al., Crypto 2018), our protocol outperforms them with respect to both total running time and online running time.
Single Input Functionality (SIF) is a special case of MPC, where only one distinguished party called dealer holds the secret input. SIF allows the dealer to complete a computation task and send to other parties their respective outputs without revealing any additional information about its secret input. SIF has many applications, including multiple-verifier zero-knowledge and verifiable relation sharing, etc. Recently, several works devote to round-efficient realization of SIF, and achieve 2-round communication in the honest majority setting (Applebaum et al., Crypto 2022; Baum et al., CCS 2022; Yang and Wang, Asiacrypt 2022). In this work, we focus on concrete efficiency and propose the first practical construction for SIF against a dishonest majority in the preprocessing model; moreover, the online phase of our protocol is only 2-round and is highly efficient, as it requires no cryptographic operations and achieves information theoretical security. For SIF among 5 parties, our scheme takes 152.34ms (total) to evaluate an AES-128 circuit with 7.36ms online time. Compared to the state-of-the-art (honest majority) solution (Baum et al., CCS 2022), our protocol is roughly 2 × faster in the online phase, although more preprocessing time is needed. Compared to the state-of-the-art generic MPC against a dishonest majority (Wang et al., CCS 2017; Cramer et al., Crypto 2018), our protocol outperforms them with respect to both total running time and online running time.
We put forth a new paradigm for secure multi-party computation (MPC) in the preprocessing model, where a feasible one-time setup can enable a lifetime of efficient online secure computations. Our protocols match the security guarantees and low costs of the cheapest category of MPC solutions, namely 3-party protocols (3PC) secure against a single malicious party, with the qualitative advantages that one party communicates data sublinear in the circuit size, and can go offline after its initial messages. This “2+ 1“-party structure can alternatively be instantiated between 2 parties with the aid of an (untrusted) dealer. Within such existing protocols, we provide comparable online performance while improving the storage and offline dealer-to-party communication requirements by more than 3 orders of magnitude. At the technical level, we build on the Fully Linear Interactive Oracle Proof (FLIOP)-based protocol design of Boyle et al. (CRYPTO 2021). We provide an extensive assortment of algorithmic and implementation-level optimizations, design efficient distributed proofs of well-formedness of complex FLIOP correlations, and make them circuit-independent. We implement and benchmark our end-to-end system against the state of the art in the 2+1 regime, a dealer-aided variant of SPDZ for Boolean circuits. We additionally extend our techniques to the(n+1)party setting, where a dealer aids general dishonest-majority MPC, and provide a variant of the protocol which further achieves security with “identifiable abort.”
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) enables privacy-preserving collaborative computation over sensitive data held by multiple mutually distrusting parties. Unfortunately, in the most natural setting where a majority of the parties are maliciously corrupt (also called the dishonest majority setting), traditional MPC protocols incur high overheads and offer weaker security guarantees than are desirable for practical applications. In this paper, we explore the possibility of circumventing these drawbacks and achieving practically efficient dishonest majority MPC protocols with strong security guarantees by assuming an additional semi-honest, non-colluding helper party HP .1We believe that this is a more realistic alternative to assuming an honest majority, since many real-world applications of MPC involving potentially large numbers of parties (such as dark pools) are typically enabled by a central governing entity that can be modeled as the HP.In the above model, we are the first to design, implement and benchmark a practically-efficient and general multi-party framework, Asterisk. Our framework requires invoking HP only a constant number of times, achieves the strong security guarantee of fairness (either all parties learn the output or none do), scales to hundreds of parties, outperforms all existing dishonest majority MPC protocols, and is, in fact, competitive with state-of-the-art honest majority MPC protocols. Our experiments show that Asterisk achieves 228 – 288× speedup in preprocessing as compared to the best dishonest majority MPC protocol. With respect to online time, Asterisk supports 100-party evaluation of a circuit with 106multiplication gates in approximately 20 seconds. We also implement and benchmark practically efficient and highly scalable dark pool instances using Asterisk. The corresponding run times showcase the effectiveness of Asterisk in enabling efficient realizations of real-world privacy-preserving applications with strong security guarantees.
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) enables a set of parties to securely carry out a joint computation of their private inputs without revealing anything but the output. Protocols for semi-honest adversaries guarantee security as long as the corrupted parties run the specified protocol and ensure that nothing is leaked in the transcript. In contrast, protocols for malicious adversaries guarantee security in the presence of arbitrary adversaries who can run any attack strategy. Security for malicious adversaries is typically what is needed in practice (and is always preferred), but comes at a significant cost. In this paper, we present the first protocol for a two-thirds honest majority that achieves security in the presence of malicious adversariesat essentially the exact same cost as the best known protocols for semi-honest adversaries. Our construction is not a general transformation and thus it is possible that better semi-honest protocols will be constructed which do not support our transformation. Nevertheless, for the current state-of-the-art for many parties (based on Shamir sharing), our protocol invokes the best semi-honest multiplication protocol exactly once per multiplication gate (plus some additional local computation that is negligible to the overall cost). Concretely, the best version of our protocol requires each party to send on average of just 2 2/3 elements per multiplication gate (when the number of multiplication gates is at least the number of parties). This is four times faster than the previous-best protocol of Barak et al. (ACM CCS 2018) for small fields, and twice as fast as the previous-best protocol of Chida et al. (CRYPTO 2018) for large fields.
In this work, we consider the setting where the process of securely evaluating a multi-party functionality is divided into two phases: offline (or preprocessing ) and online . The offline phase is independent of the parties’ inputs, whereas the online phase does require the knowledge of the inputs. We consider the problem of minimizing the round of communication required in the online phase and propose a round preserving compiler that can turn a big class of multi-party computation (MPC) protocols into protocols in which only the last two rounds are input-dependent. Our compiler can be applied to a big class of MPC protocols, and in particular to all existing round-optimal MPC protocols. All our results assume no setup and are proven in the dishonest majority setting with black-box simulation. As part of our contribution, we propose a new definition we call Multi-Party Computation with Adaptive-Input Selection , which allows the distinguisher to craft the inputs the honest parties should use during the online phase, adaptively on the offline phase. This new definition is needed to argue that not only are the messages of the offline phase input-independent but also that security holds even in the stronger (and realistic) adversarial setting where the inputs may depend on some of the offline-phase protocol messages. We argue that this is the definition that any protocol should satisfy to be securely used while preprocessing part of the rounds. We are the first to study this definition in a setting where there is no setup, and the majority of the parties can be corrupted. Prior definitions have been presented in the Universal Composable framework, which is unfortunately not well suited for our setting (i.e., no setup and dishonest majority). As a corollary, we obtain the first four-round (which is optimal) MPC protocol, where the first two rounds can be preprocessed, and its security holds against adaptive-input selection.
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) allows a set of mutually distrustful parties to compute a public function on their private inputs without revealing anything beyond the output of the computation. This paper focuses on the specific case of actively secure three-party computation with an honest majority. In particular, we are interested in solutions which allow to evaluate arithmetic circuits over real-world CPU word sizes, like 32- and 64-bit words. Our starting point is the novel compiler of Damgård et al. from CRYPTO 2018. First, we present an improved version of it which reduces the online communication complexity by a factor of 2. Next, we replace their preprocessing protocol (with arithmetic modulo a large prime) with a more efficient preprocessing which only performs arithmetic modulo powers of two. Finally, we present a novel "postprocessing" check which replaces the preprocessing phase. These protocols offer different efficiency tradeoffs and can therefore outperform each other in different deployment settings. We demonstrate this with benchmarks in a LAN and different WAN settings. Concretely, we achieve a throughput of 1 million 64-bit multiplications per second with parties located in different continents and 3 million in one location.
Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) considers the problem where a set of mutually distrusting parties want to jointly compute a function over their private inputs, without revealing any extra information about these inputs other than what it can be inferred from the output of the function. This setting is well-motivated, and it has many real-world applications such as auction, voting, etc. MPC can be also seen as a generalization of many natural cryptographic primitives. For example, zero-knowledge (ZK) can be viewed as a special case of two-party secure computation. In ZK, a party, called prover aims to convince a second party, called verifier, that the prover’s private input witness w and a public input statement x belong to a relation R. An important research direction in secure computation is to find the trade-off between the required setup (e.g., the use of the broadcast channel, the use of common reference string (CRS) / public key infrastructure (PKI), the upper bound of the parties that can be corrupted, etc.), and the security guarantees that can be achieved. The setups can be viewed as some general assumptions that the protocol needs to satisfy, and they influence the usability of the protocol in real-world scenarios. In principle, having simpler (or no) setups mean that the protocol is more general and can be more useful in real-world scenarios. At the same time, having simpler setups may lead to weaker security guarantees. Therefore, finding the trade-off between setup and security guarantees is important and meaningful. In this thesis, we target MPC and ZK, and we focus on how to minimize the setup for MPC and ZK while still providing meaningful levels of security. More specifically: Regarding MPC, we focus on the dishonest majority (i.e., the adversary can corrupt all but one party), and we aim at 1) minimizing the use of broadcast channels. 2) studying the MPC with pre-processing when no setup is available. • Informally, a broadcast channel guarantees that when a message is sent, this reaches all the parties, without ambiguity. It also guarantees that if an honest party receives a message from a corrupted party, then it is guaranteed that all the honest parties have received the message. To realize broadcast, parties in the protocol could run the broadcast protocol, which may require many rounds of peer-to-peer communications. An alternative way is to rely on physical or external infrastructure such as blockchain. In both cases, broadcast is expensive, as such, we want to minimize its use. In particular, this thesis presents the following results: – When assuming no setup, we give a complete characterization with respect to the use of broadcast channels, and we obtain the optimal results. – We consider the same problem for the case that we only want to allow the black-box use (i.e., do not have access to the code of the algorithm) of the oblivious transfer protocol. We also give a characterization. • In the standard definition of MPC, the parties’ private inputs are fixed before the start of the protocol. However, there is another type of MPC named MPC with pre-processing, where the protocol can pre-compute some messages without using parties’ inputs, and these messages can accelerate computations in the online phase (i.e., other computations that require parties’ inputs). Since some expensive computations can be pre-computed, the online phase could be more lightweight. Therefore, we want to remove the dependency of the input from as many rounds as possible, so that we can do some pre-processing. In this direction, we explore the protocol with no setup. We provide a compiler that can turn a big class of MPC protocol that may require the inputs already to compute the first round, into a new protocol that needs the inputs only in the last two rounds. We also propose new MPC definitions that capture this delayed-input features. Regarding ZK, we do the following: • In standard single-theorem ZK definition, the security of the ZK protocol is guaranteed to hold only when one proof is issued. In the case where multiple zero-knowledge proofs need to be issued (i.e., to prove multiple NP statements), each new zero-knowledge proof requires a freshly generated setup. In the multi-theorem ZK definition, instead, one setup is sufficient for generating multiple zero-knowledge proofs for multiple instances. We propose a multi-theorem protocol (in the format of a compiler) that follows the Fiat-Shamir paradigm and relies on correlation intractable hash functions. Moreover, our protocol remains zero-knowledge and sound even against adversaries that choose the statement to be proven (and the witness for the case of zero-knowledge) adaptively on the key of the hash function. Prior works could achieve this adaptive security only inefficiently via NP reductions. • ZK protocols are secure only when all setups are correctly generated, but in real-world scenarios, some of the setups may not be correctly generated. For instance, to run a non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) protocol, the setup CRS could be chosen with bias. In this case, the security of the NIZK protocol does not hold anymore. Instead of finding a secure ZK candidate, one alternative solution is to have multiple instantiations of ZK candidates and assume that only for a subset of them the setup is generated correctly. More formally, we consider the case where only a subset of the instances are secure. In more detail, given access to n candidate instantiations of a NIZK for some language, we want to have a construction that itself implements a NIZK for the same language without relying on any additional computational assumptions. We refer to this type of construction as combiner, and the combiner is secure assuming at least t of the given candidates are secure. In this work, we provide three different constructions of robust NIZK combiners and show that combiners are impossible to realize unless the majority of the input candidates are secure.