Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European journal of applied sciences

Mystery's End: Analysis of Bell's Theorem

Darrell Bender

Published Mar 25, 2024• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract. For unit vectors a, b, entanglement requires that spin measurements satisfy those just given for a≠b. Bell’s hidden variable quantum mechanical local particle with a=b cannot provide the values for a≠b and, hence, the values for an entangled particle system. The perception that any hidden variable quantum mechanical description of an entangled system of particles is non-local depends on Bell’s inappropriate definition of locality, which excludes entanglement for a distant particle, and the condition that a=b, which does not give the values for a≠b as required to give the quantum mechanical expectation values, when entanglement occurs for systems that are close, not distant, and ignores that entanglement is a local phenomenon. Expecting the condition a=b and a local particle analysis with no distant entangled particle to give the quantum mechanical result is absurd. Any disentanglement of once entangled particles moving apart sets the spin measurements at those given for a≠b if a≠b and those given for a=b if a=b. Any subsequent measurement of the set values agrees with those for a≠b if a≠b and those given for a=b if a=b just as if the particles are entangled still. In examples where Bell’s inequality is supposedly violated, the conditions for which the inequality is true are not met. There is no contradiction.

DOI
10.14738/aivp.123.17174

Related papers

On Quantum Entanglement and Nonlocality

Uddin, Mafiz

EPR showed that two particles emitted from a source can be entangled by a shared wavefunction where two non-commuting observables (position, momentum) can be simultaneously real, leading to a contradiction with quantum mechanics (two non-commuting variables can not be simultaneously real). John Bell derived an inequality where any local hidden variables prediction is bounded and quantum mechanics can violate the inequality. Bell tests on correlated photon pairs showed a clear violation of the Bell inequality and agreement with quantum mechanics. This study revealed that the Bell inequality holds at any individual instances in a given system but it does not hold over the entire population. The Bell inequality is not an incompatibility criterion for local hidden variables vs quantum mechanics rather it is a criterion for an individual nature vs population dynamics. The nonlocality prediction given by wavefunction is a system approximation and local causality (photon polarization) provides a complete description of the Bell tests. The paper concludes with great satisfaction that the measurement of two correlated photons at a distance was a local cause (photon-filter interaction did not violate the special theory of relativity).

arXiv:2506.00366•May 31, 2025•0 citations

A Re-examination of Bell's Inequality: Polarization Correspondence in Entangled Photon Pairs

Jingyuan Guo

Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.

•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

The True Relation of Photon Pairs:Independent Particles under Initial-State Constraints and the Falsification of the "Quantum Entanglement" Collapse Hypothesis

Fan Xie

This paper aims to clarify the true physical relation of photon pairs and to falsify the "entanglement collapse" hypothesis that standard quantum mechanics imposes upon them. Bell experiments violating Bell's inequality only rule out "local independent hidden variables," and are not a sufficient condition for proving "superposition plus wave-function collapse." The physical definition of entanglement in standard quantum mechanics is: subsystems are strongly correlated, the system is inseparable, and the individual subsystem has no definite independent physical state; its mathematical expressions are the non-factorizability of pure-state wave functions and the non-convex-combination of mixed-state density matrices. The physical definition and mathematical expressions are fully aligned: the individual subsystem cannot be written as a separate expression and has no definite independent physical state. Operationally, it is also absolutely impossible to realize an individual measurement of the subsystem. However, in Bell experiments, photon pairs are separately and individually measured on spatially separated detectors, which directly falsifies the premise that "the photon pair is in an entangled state." Stripping away mysticism, the true relation of two photons is a linear equation with two unknowns (independent particles under an initial-state constraint); the three-photon logic (a linear equation with three unknowns) proves that after measuring one photon, the other two still have not collapsed into definite values and must still be measured individually to obtain their states—"wave-function collapse into a definite value" is purely fictitious in algebraic logic.

•Oct 27, 2026•0 citations

Conditional Independence Leads to Satisfaction of the Bell Inequality without Assuming Non-Locality or Non-Reality

Louis Sica

The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.

Advances in Pure Mathematics•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations

Are models of local hidden variables for the singlet polarization state necessarily constrained by the Bell inequality?

David H. Oaknin

The Bell inequality is thought to be a common constraint shared by all models of local hidden variables that aim to describe the entangled states of two qubits. Since the inequality is violated by the quantum mechanical description of these states, it purportedly allows distinguishing in an experimentally testable way the predictions of quantum mechanics from those of models of local hidden variables and, ultimately, ruling the latter out. In this paper, we show, however, that the models of local hidden variables constrained by the Bell inequality all share a subtle, though crucial, feature that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it might not be fulfilled in the actual experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, the disputed feature neither can be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics and it is even at odds with the fundamental principle of relativity. Namely, the proof of the inequality requires the existence of a preferred absolute frame of reference (supposedly provided by the lab) with respect to which the hidden properties of the entangled particles and the orientations of each one of the measurement devices that test them can be independently defined through a long sequence of realizations of the experiment. We notice, however, that while the relative orientation between the two measurement devices is a properly defined physical magnitude in every single realization of the experiment, their global rigid orientation with respect to a lab frame is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Following this observation, we were able to explicitly build a model of local hidden variables that does not share the disputed feature and, hence, it is able to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics for the entangled states of two qubits.

arXiv:2008.01529•Modern Physics Letters A•Jun 25, 2020•4 citations

Can a hidden-variable-based system violate Bell’s inequality?

Mahmoud Bahnasy

Abstract Quantum mechanics predicts faster-than-light information transportation in order to satisfy quantum entanglement experimental results. Such a prediction violates the locality principle and Bell’s inequality. Quantum mechanisms also state that the world is intrinsically probabilistic. Such an idea was not welcome by many scientists including Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. To resolve such a dilemma, the ”Many-world” theory was presented by Hugh Everett in 1975. Such a theory asserts that the universal wave function is real and that there is no wave function collapse. Also, it states that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in other parallel universes. Besides, in quantum mechanics, the observer effect defines a state transition of quantum objects. Such a phenomenon affirms that quantum objects behave differently depending on being observed or not. In this paper, we present few assumptions based on which we build a classical hidden-variable-based system that can violate Bell’s inequality. Therefore, adopting similar assumptions in explaining quantum entanglement could lead to a better explanation of quantum mechanics without violating the locality principle or adopting such weird assumptions. Hence, one can conclude that extending Quantum Mechanism by a set of similar hidden variables can resolve such a paradox and predict the quantum entanglement experimental results without violating the locality principle.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 1, 2021•0 citations
Abstract. For unit vectors a, b, entanglement requires that spin measurements satisfy those just given for a≠b. Bell’s hidden variable quantum mechanical local particle with a=b cannot provide the values for a≠b and, hence, the values for an entangled particle system. The perception that any hidden variable quantum mechanical description of an entangled system of particles is non-local depends on Bell’s inappropriate definition of locality, which excludes entanglement for a distant particle, and the condition that a=b, which does not give the values for a≠b as required to give the quantum mechanical expectation values, when entanglement occurs for systems that are close, not distant, and ignores that entanglement is a local phenomenon. Expecting the condition a=b and a local particle analysis with no distant entangled particle to give the quantum mechanical result is absurd. Any disentanglement of once entangled particles moving apart sets the spin measurements at those given for a≠b if a≠b and those given for a=b if a=b. Any subsequent measurement of the set values agrees with those for a≠b if a≠b and those given for a=b if a=b just as if the particles are entangled still. In examples where Bell’s inequality is supposedly violated, the conditions for which the inequality is true are not met. There is no contradiction.
EPR showed that two particles emitted from a source can be entangled by a shared wavefunction where two non-commuting observables (position, momentum) can be simultaneously real, leading to a contradiction with quantum mechanics (two non-commuting variables can not be simultaneously real). John Bell derived an inequality where any local hidden variables prediction is bounded and quantum mechanics can violate the inequality. Bell tests on correlated photon pairs showed a clear violation of the Bell inequality and agreement with quantum mechanics. This study revealed that the Bell inequality holds at any individual instances in a given system but it does not hold over the entire population. The Bell inequality is not an incompatibility criterion for local hidden variables vs quantum mechanics rather it is a criterion for an individual nature vs population dynamics. The nonlocality prediction given by wavefunction is a system approximation and local causality (photon polarization) provides a complete description of the Bell tests. The paper concludes with great satisfaction that the measurement of two correlated photons at a distance was a local cause (photon-filter interaction did not violate the special theory of relativity).
Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.
This paper aims to clarify the true physical relation of photon pairs and to falsify the "entanglement collapse" hypothesis that standard quantum mechanics imposes upon them. Bell experiments violating Bell's inequality only rule out "local independent hidden variables," and are not a sufficient condition for proving "superposition plus wave-function collapse." The physical definition of entanglement in standard quantum mechanics is: subsystems are strongly correlated, the system is inseparable, and the individual subsystem has no definite independent physical state; its mathematical expressions are the non-factorizability of pure-state wave functions and the non-convex-combination of mixed-state density matrices. The physical definition and mathematical expressions are fully aligned: the individual subsystem cannot be written as a separate expression and has no definite independent physical state. Operationally, it is also absolutely impossible to realize an individual measurement of the subsystem. However, in Bell experiments, photon pairs are separately and individually measured on spatially separated detectors, which directly falsifies the premise that "the photon pair is in an entangled state." Stripping away mysticism, the true relation of two photons is a linear equation with two unknowns (independent particles under an initial-state constraint); the three-photon logic (a linear equation with three unknowns) proves that after measuring one photon, the other two still have not collapsed into definite values and must still be measured individually to obtain their states—"wave-function collapse into a definite value" is purely fictitious in algebraic logic.
The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.
The Bell inequality is thought to be a common constraint shared by all models of local hidden variables that aim to describe the entangled states of two qubits. Since the inequality is violated by the quantum mechanical description of these states, it purportedly allows distinguishing in an experimentally testable way the predictions of quantum mechanics from those of models of local hidden variables and, ultimately, ruling the latter out. In this paper, we show, however, that the models of local hidden variables constrained by the Bell inequality all share a subtle, though crucial, feature that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it might not be fulfilled in the actual experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, the disputed feature neither can be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics and it is even at odds with the fundamental principle of relativity. Namely, the proof of the inequality requires the existence of a preferred absolute frame of reference (supposedly provided by the lab) with respect to which the hidden properties of the entangled particles and the orientations of each one of the measurement devices that test them can be independently defined through a long sequence of realizations of the experiment. We notice, however, that while the relative orientation between the two measurement devices is a properly defined physical magnitude in every single realization of the experiment, their global rigid orientation with respect to a lab frame is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Following this observation, we were able to explicitly build a model of local hidden variables that does not share the disputed feature and, hence, it is able to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics for the entangled states of two qubits.
Abstract Quantum mechanics predicts faster-than-light information transportation in order to satisfy quantum entanglement experimental results. Such a prediction violates the locality principle and Bell’s inequality. Quantum mechanisms also state that the world is intrinsically probabilistic. Such an idea was not welcome by many scientists including Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. To resolve such a dilemma, the ”Many-world” theory was presented by Hugh Everett in 1975. Such a theory asserts that the universal wave function is real and that there is no wave function collapse. Also, it states that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in other parallel universes. Besides, in quantum mechanics, the observer effect defines a state transition of quantum objects. Such a phenomenon affirms that quantum objects behave differently depending on being observed or not. In this paper, we present few assumptions based on which we build a classical hidden-variable-based system that can violate Bell’s inequality. Therefore, adopting similar assumptions in explaining quantum entanglement could lead to a better explanation of quantum mechanics without violating the locality principle or adopting such weird assumptions. Hence, one can conclude that extending Quantum Mechanism by a set of similar hidden variables can resolve such a paradox and predict the quantum entanglement experimental results without violating the locality principle.