Quantum computing technologies are undergoing rapid development. The different qubit modalities being considered for quantum computing each have their strengths and weaknesses, making it challenging to compare their performance relative to each other and the state-of-the-art in classical high-performance computing. To better understand the utility of a given quantum processor and to assess when and how it will be able to advance the frontiers of computational science, researchers need a robust approach to quantum benchmarking. A variety of approaches have been proposed, many of which characterize the presence of noise in current quantum devices. These efforts include component-level performance metrics, such as randomized benchmarking and gate set tomography; high-level application-dependent metrics; and devicelevel metrics, such as the Quantum Volume. However, it remains unclear how low-level metrics, such as fidelities and decoherence times, and global device metrics, such as Quantum Volume, relate to the computational utility and practical limitations of quantum processors to solve useful problems. In this paper, we describe our Hamiltonian-oriented approach to quantum benchmarking called HamPerf. Where previous application-dependent approaches specify a suite of benchmarking circuits inspired by applications, we place the problem Hamiltonian at the center. Our strategy allows us to probe the computational performance of a quantum processor on standardized and relevant problem sets, agnostic of the algorithms and hardware used to solve them; it also provides fundamental insights into how device characteristics correlate with computational utility.
Quantum computing technologies are undergoing rapid development. The different qubit modalities being considered for quantum computing each have their strengths and weaknesses, making it challenging to compare their performance relative to each other and the state-of-the-art in classical high-performance computing. To better understand the utility of a given quantum processor and to assess when and how it will be able to advance the frontiers of computational science, researchers need a robust approach to quantum benchmarking. A variety of approaches have been proposed, many of which characterize the presence of noise in current quantum devices. These efforts include component-level performance metrics, such as randomized benchmarking and gate set tomography; high-level application-dependent metrics; and devicelevel metrics, such as the Quantum Volume. However, it remains unclear how low-level metrics, such as fidelities and decoherence times, and global device metrics, such as Quantum Volume, relate to the computational utility and practical limitations of quantum processors to solve useful problems. In this paper, we describe our Hamiltonian-oriented approach to quantum benchmarking called HamPerf. Where previous application-dependent approaches specify a suite of benchmarking circuits inspired by applications, we place the problem Hamiltonian at the center. Our strategy allows us to probe the computational performance of a quantum processor on standardized and relevant problem sets, agnostic of the algorithms and hardware used to solve them; it also provides fundamental insights into how device characteristics correlate with computational utility.
Abstract The technological development of increasingly larger quantum processors on different quantum platforms raises the problem of how to fairly compare their performance, known as quantum benchmarking of quantum processors. This is a challenge that computer scientists have already faced when comparing classical processors, leading to the development of various mathematical tools to address it, but also to the identification of the limits of this problem. In this work, we briefly review the most important aspects of both classical processor benchmarks and the metrics comprising them, providing precise definitions and analyzing the quality attributes that they should exhibit. Subsequently, we analyze the intrinsic properties that characterize the paradigm of quantum computing and hinder the naive transfer of strategies from classical benchmarking. However, we can still leverage some of the lessons learned such as the quality attributes of a good benchmark such as relevance, reproducibility, fairness, verifiability and usability. Additionally, we review some of the most important metrics and benchmarks for quantum processors proposed in the literature, assessing what quality attributes they fulfill. Finally, we propose general guidelines for quantum benchmarking. These guidelines aim to pave the way for establishing a roadmap towards standardizing the performance evaluation of quantum devices, ultimately leading to the creation of an organization akin to the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC).
Architectures for quantum computing can only be scaled up when they are accompanied by suitable benchmarking techniques. The document provides a comprehensive overview of the state and recommendations for systematic benchmarking of quantum computers. Benchmarking is crucial for assessing the performance of quantum computers, including the hardware, software, as well as algorithms and applications. The document highlights key aspects such as component-level, system-level, software-level, HPC-level, and application-level benchmarks. Component-level benchmarks focus on the performance of individual qubits and gates, while system-level benchmarks evaluate the entire quantum processor. Software-level benchmarks consider the compiler's efficiency and error mitigation techniques. HPC-level and cloud benchmarks address integration with classical systems and cloud platforms, respectively. Application-level benchmarks measure performance in real-world use cases. The document also discusses the importance of standardization to ensure reproducibility and comparability of benchmarks, and highlights ongoing efforts in the quantum computing community towards establishing these benchmarks. Recommendations for future steps emphasize the need for developing standardized evaluation routines and integrating benchmarks with broader quantum technology activities.
Quantum processors are now able to run quantum circuits that are infeasible to simulate classically, creating a need for benchmarks that assess a quantum processor's rate of errors when running these circuits. Here, we introduce a general technique for creating efficient benchmarks from any set of quantum computations, specified by unitary circuits. Our benchmarks assess the integrated performance of a quantum processor's classical compilation algorithms and its low-level quantum operations. Unlike existing “full-stack benchmarks”, our benchmarks do not require classical simulations of quantum circuits, and they use only efficient classical computations. We use our method to create randomized circuit benchmarks, including a computationally efficient version of the quantum volume benchmark, and an algorithm-based benchmark that uses Hamiltonian simulation circuits. We perform these benchmarks on IBM Q devices and in simulations, and we compare their results to the results of existing benchmarking methods.
In the near-term "NISQ"-era of noisy, intermediate-scale, quantum hardware and beyond, reliably determining the quality of quantum devices becomes increasingly important: users need to be able to compare them with one another, and make an estimate whether they are capable of performing a given task ahead of time. In this work, we develop and release an advanced quantum benchmarking framework in order to help assess the state of the art of current quantum devices. Our testing framework measures the performance of universal quantum devices in a hardware-agnostic way, with metrics that are aimed to facilitate an intuitive understanding of which device is likely to outperform others on a given task. This is achieved through six structured tests that allow for an immediate, visual assessment of how devices compare. Each test is designed with scalability in mind, making this framework not only suitable for testing the performance of present-day quantum devices, but also of those released in the foreseeable future. The series of tests are motivated by real-life scenarios, and therefore emphasise the interplay between various relevant characteristics of quantum devices, such as qubit count, connectivity, and gate and measurement fidelity. We present the benchmark results of twenty-one different quantum devices from IBM, Rigetti and IonQ.
As quantum technologies continue to advance, the proliferation of hardware architectures with diverse capabilities and limitations has underscored the importance of benchmarking as a tool to compare performance across platforms. Achieving fair, scalable and consistent evaluations is a key open problem in quantum computing, particularly in the pre-fault-tolerant era. To address this challenge, we introduce QuSquare, a quality-oriented benchmark suite designed to provide a scalable, fair, reproducible, and well-defined framework for assessing the performance of quantum devices across hardware architectures. QuSquare consists of four benchmark tests that evaluate quantum hardware performance at both the system and application levels: Partial Clifford Randomized, Multipartite Entanglement, Transverse Field Ising Model (TFIM) Hamiltonian Simulation, and Data Re-Uploading Quantum Neural Network (QNN). Together, these benchmarks offer an integral, hardware-agnostic, and impartial methodology to quantify the quality and capabilities of current quantum computers, supporting fair cross-platform comparisons and fostering the development of future performance standards.
Current technological advancements of quantum computers highlight the need for application-driven, practical and well-defined methods of benchmarking their performance. As the existing NISQ device's quality of two-qubit gate errors rate is even around one percent and the number of qubits is still limited to a few or several dozen, naturally, we need to propose rather small algorithms instances taken from key promising application areas, such as quantum chemistry, combinatorial optimisation or machine learning. While many techniques for assessing the performance of logical components, such as gate fidelity and qubit coherence exist, it is still challenging to extrapolate those values onto the performance of different quantum algorithms and subroutines. This work aims to introduce a series of initial quantum application benchmarks together with a methodology of execution for measuring the performance and fidelity of the results. The proposed suite refers to several variational algorithms widely used on available NISQ devices but also includes examples of quantum circuits designed for a fault-tolerant quantum computer.